[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Watching The Cops
See other Watching The Cops Articles

Title: 'They don't give a f*** if I die out here in this cold weather': Denver police forced to defend officers after they were filmed taking blankets from homeless people on a freezing night
Source: Daily Mail Online
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... -blankets-homeless-people.html
Published: Dec 17, 2016
Author: Liam Quinn
Post Date: 2016-12-17 14:23:21 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 41217
Comments: 129

  • Footage was widely shared showing homeless people on the street in Denver
  • A group of officers dragged blankets from people and then carried them away
  • The videos were published by the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado
  • The rights group has called the Denver Police approach in the videos 'cruel'
  • Denver Mayor Michael Hancock denied what was seen is a 'widespread practice'

The Denver Police Department has been forced to defend its officers after shocking video emerged of cops taking blankets and survival gear from homeless people in the freezing cold.

Footage was widely circulated this week showing as many as nine officers standing over a group of homeless people, pulling blankets off them as they slept and sat on the sidewalk.

In a video published on November 29 shortly after 2:30am, two officers stacked the blankets in piles and then carried them away.

The blankets were taken as 'evidence' the homeless people in the video were committing a crime by violating the city's urban camping ban.

'We are taking your tent and sleeping bag as evidence of a crime,' one of the officers told a homeless man, who the video claims is a veteran.

'It's cold out here, and (the police) are telling me they don't give a f*** about whether I die out here in this cold weather,' the homeless man was heard saying in the footage.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado shared the videos this week, and included a letter to Denver Mayor Michael Hancock and the Denver City Council demanding officers stop taking things from homeless people.

'It is not an inherent crime to sleep outside, and many people right now have no other viable option,' ACLU of Colorado Executive Director Nathan Woodliff-Stanley said.

'Denver’s shelters are simply unable to serve all people in the Denver area experiencing homelessness, even in the short term, much less as a long-term solution.

'Until real solutions become Denver’s priority, the city’s ongoing policing-first approach to homelessness is a cruel waste of funds, curtailing fundamental constitutional rights, causing deep human suffering, and endangering lives.'

Hancock defended his officers, saying it is not a 'widespread practice', and claimed the homeless people were protesters.

'The video clip... was actually three individuals who were protesting and setting up camp in front of city hall,' he said, according to CBS Local.

'And after the police asked them to move, they did not, they were cited and their equipment was taken as evidence.

'But this is not a widespread practice throughout the city and we wanted to make sure that it didn’t go any further and that people understand this is not how we want to operate during these frigid temperatures.'

The Denver Police Department also released a statement, saying it took the equipment from the people in the videos because they were 'illegally camping'.

Click for Full Text!

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 77.

#1. To: cranky, misterwhite (#0)

Waiting for Whitie to explain this.

A Pole  posted on  2016-12-17   14:34:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A Pole (#1)

They were violating the law. F**k 'em.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-12-17   16:04:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#2)

Fuck people because you have a 500 thousand dollar house and they don't.

Jesus said to help the poor people.

You are not a christian. Fuck the law when it is immoral.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   16:19:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: A K A Stone (#4)

It was a set up.

"The confiscation of the blankets and tents is not a widespread practice of the police department. The reality is we had three individuals who were protesting, were camping out in front of city hall after repeated requests to move along they were cited." - Denver Mayor Michael Hancock

Roscoe  posted on  2016-12-17   16:56:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Roscoe (#8)

"The reality is ..."

Hey, hey. Watch it. You keep posting facts and you may be banned.

Just limit yourself to touchy-feely stories about the poor and downtrodden breaking the law like everyone else posts.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-12-17   17:11:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: misterwhite (#11)

You keep posting facts and you may be banned.

I'll risk it.

In both cases, officers on scene offered services and shelter to those individuals. After they refused the police officers’ assistance, the individuals were advised that they were violating the law and needed to move. After several warnings, during an approximate four-hour period outside of the Denver City and County Building, three protesters chose to remain and were therefore cited. Officers collected items as evidence of the violations."

Roscoe  posted on  2016-12-17   18:55:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Roscoe (#21)

What law did they violate?

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   20:00:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: A K A Stone (#27)

What law did they violate?

It was a local ordnance

Sec. 38-86.2. - Unauthorized camping on public or private property prohibited.

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to camp upon any private property without the express written consent of the property owner or the owner's agent, and only in such locations where camping may be conducted in accordance with any other applicable city law. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to camp upon any public property except in any location where camping has been expressly allowed by the officer or agency having the control, management and supervision of the public property in question. (c) No law enforcement officer shall issue a citation, make an arrest or otherwise enforce this section against any person unless: (1) The officer orally requests or orders the person to refrain from the alleged violation of this section and, if the person fails to comply after receiving the oral request or order, the officer tenders a written request or order to the person warning that if the person fails to comply the person may be cited or arrested for a violation of this section; and (2) The officer attempts to ascertain whether the person is in need of medical or human services assistance, including, but not limited, to mental health treatment, drug or alcohol rehabilitation, or homeless services assistance. If the officer determines that the person may be in need of medical or human services assistance, the officer shall make reasonable efforts to contact and obtain the assistance of a designated human service outreach worker, who in turn shall assess the needs of the person and, if warranted, direct the person to an appropriate provider of medical or human services assistance in lieu of the person being cited or arrested for a violation of this section. If the officer is unable to obtain the assistance of a human services outreach worker, if the human services outreach worker determines that the person is not in need of medical or human services assistance, or if the person refuses to cooperate with the direction of the human services outreach worker, the officer may proceed to cite or arrest the person for a violation of this section so long as the warnings required by paragraph (1) of this subsection have been previously given. (d) For purposes of this section: (1) "Camp" means to reside or dwell temporarily in a place, with shelter. The term "shelter" includes, without limitation, any tent, tarpaulin, lean-to, sleeping bag, bedroll, blankets, or any form of cover or protection from the elements other than clothing. The term "reside or dwell" includes, without limitation, conducting such activities as eating, sleeping, or the storage of personal possessions. (2) "Designated human service outreach worker" shall mean any person designated in writing by the manager of the Denver Department of Human Services to assist law enforcement officers as provided in subsection (c), regardless of whether the person is an employee of the department of human services. (3) "Public property" means, by way of illustration, any street, alley, sidewalk, pedestrian or transit mall, bike path, greenway, or any other structure or area encompassed within the public right-of-way; any park, parkway, mountain park, or other recreation facility; or any other grounds, buildings, or other facilities owned or leased by the city or by any other public owner, regardless of whether such public property is vacant or occupied and actively used for any public purpose.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17   20:06:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: GrandIsland (#28)

Yes the government passed that law. But truthfully without any doubt it violates the constitution.

First amendment- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The people protesting were protesting peacefully. It is cold outside and you can't expect them to protest in shorts and a t shirt. There is no limitation on what time of year they are allowed to protest.

Furthermore the police violated their fourth amendment rights. Their tents are their effects.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

So I realize courts may decide differetnly. But I don't care what they decide. I can read and I know the truth.

Just because the government doesn't want to be inconvenienced they harrassed these people and violated their rights.

I don't care if you call it camping or not. They were there protesting peacefully. They need tents and blankets to keep warm.

I know you will not agree with me and that is ok.

But I have one question for you. If the situation was the same except they didn't have tents would you have the same opinion?

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   20:16:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: A K A Stone (#30)

If the situation was the same except they didn't have tents would you have the same opinion?

I didn't read the whole article, because I quickly realized that it was YELLA. The author attempts to invoke sympathy from the weak liberal populace by painting the arrestees as "homeless" when they were really protesters. THAT'S YELLA.

It's getting difficult to find a truthfull, well written article on this site that doesn't have a fucking agenda behind it. It's almost as bad as CNN.

Ok... I'll answer your question. If they were truly homeless, and I wasn't going to be terminated for insubordination, no, I wouldn't have taken their blankets and tents. I wouldn't have arrested them either. I'd have tried to relocate them in another part of my jurisdiction, that would cause less public complaints. If they were PROTESTERS, with nice warm homes... but the libtarded assholes like to act like anarchist Deckard, I'd have cuffed them up, confiscated their CAMP equipment... in a professional but not so nice fashion.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17   20:42:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: GrandIsland (#34)

If they were PROTESTERS, with nice warm homes... but the libtarded assholes like to act like anarchist Deckard, I'd have cuffed them up, confiscated their CAMP equipment... in a professional but not so nice fashion.

But protesting isn't against the law. It is protected as free speech in the first amendment.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   21:02:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: A K A Stone (#36)

But protesting isn't against the law.

You making that comment is also YELLA. Nobody said protesting is against the law. They were doing more than protesting... they were also illegally CAMPING... acting like an asshole Deckard in the 1st degree.

Protesting doesn't give you special rights to break the law. They can't do it naked, they can't burn shit... and they can't violate local ordnances... just because they are protesting. Let's leave the YELLA out of this discussion if you want to really talk.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17   21:20:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: GrandIsland (#38)

and they can't violate local ordnances..

Local ordinances do not override the first amendment.

That is probably why the mayor has called for the taking of private property to stop.

Why did they take the tents anyway. Just to harass those people and make their lives harder? The government uses video footage and photographs for evidence all the time. Seems to me that they could have just taken a pic for evidence of their pretend crime of living.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   21:23:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: A K A Stone (#40)

Local ordinances do not override the first amendment.

There is no constitutional right to CAMPING off your own property. Your suggestion is YELLA, yet again. They can protest without camping.

We had a local ordnance for loud music after a certain hour. When writing a local ordinance ticket didn't work, and I was dispatched BACK for another loud music complaint, I confiscated their music making equipment and speakers, as evidence. I remember my old DA not approving of the taking of the evidence... but he wasn't the person who had to babysit, repeatedly, the assholes. So I paid no mind to his opinion.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17   21:33:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: GrandIsland (#44)

There is no constitutional right to CAMPING off your own property. Your suggestion is YELLA, yet again. They can protest without camping.

There is nothing in the constitution that limits when they can protest.

The founders didn't have hotels with furnaces. They would have had tents and fires to protest long term.

It isn't yellow it is truth.

They did nothing unlawful or immoral. They did something illegal under color of law.

I guess we just disagree. That is ok. We will agree on other issues.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   21:37:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: A K A Stone (#47)

There is nothing in the constitution that limits when they can protest.

There's nothing in the constitution that allows them to break the law while they protest either.

They can't stand in the road to protest... and they can't violate other laws, such as unauthorized camping, either.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17   21:40:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: GrandIsland (#50)

They can't stand in the road to protest... and they can't violate other laws, such as unauthorized camping, either.

I agree 100 percent if they protest and block traffic on a street.

They weren't doing that.

The legislature let the people down by violating their oaths of office and passing unconstitutional legislation.

Than all the judges who get bribed and are corrupt go along with it.

Screw them all.

Our moral compass is correct. Mine says they were not doing anything immoral. Nothing to harm anyone. What happened to them was wrong.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   21:47:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: A K A Stone (#56)

I agree 100 percent if they protest and block traffic on a street.

They weren't doing that.

I can't logically debate with you if your argument is that the defendants in the case should be able to violate certain laws, but not others, that YOU deem is ok, while protesting. It's an in winnable debate on my part... you've made your own rules to live by.

Your idiology wouldn't hold up as a defense in court.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17   21:54:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: GrandIsland (#63)

I can't logically debate with you if your argument is that the defendants in the case should be able to violate certain laws,

The constitution is the supreme law of the land.

You never addressed my points I made about it.

Why do you think any law made is lawful and doesn't have to follow the constitution to the LETTER?

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   21:56:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: A K A Stone (#65)

The constitution is the supreme law of the land.

You never addressed my points I made about it.

I addressed it twice.

Both times I've stated that the constitution doesn't protect against camping OFF YOUR PROPERTY. The constitution doesn't protect you from breaking laws while you protest.

Only in your mind it does... that's why you didn't hear me TWICE tell you that... unless this was yet another YELLA attempt at defending ones position.

You truly are surprising me. I'm beginning to see why you keep the agenda trash around.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17   22:07:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: GrandIsland (#75)

You truly are surprising me. I'm beginning to see why you keep the agenda trash around.

I agree with what you call "the agenda trash" sometimes. Yes that is true.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-12-17   22:09:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 77.

#79. To: A K A Stone (#77) (Edited)

I agree with what you call "the agenda trash" sometimes. Yes that is true.

I figured it was purely for entertainment purposes is why you kept them around.

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-12-17 22:11:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 77.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com