[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Pentagon: Hillary Clinton Should Be Arrested For Leaking Top Secret Nuclear Intelligence on National TV
Source: tryepundit.com
URL Source: http://truepundit.com/pentagon-hill ... r-intelligence-on-national-tv/
Published: Oct 20, 2016
Author: Admin
Post Date: 2016-10-20 23:16:39 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 2987
Comments: 18

Hillary Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense personnel.

Clinton, responding to opponent Donald Trump and a question posed by debate moderator Chris Wallace, boasted specific and “damaging” details about the United States’ nuclear response time to retaliate during a nuclear attack. Clinton said:

“But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton, National TV Appearance

“Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in- chief,” a top-ranking DOD intelligence source said. “What she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”

According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass, including the following “need-to-know” (NTK) officials:

  • President
  • Vice President
  • Secretary of State
  • Secretary of Defense
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
  • Attorney General
  • Director of National Intelligence
  • CIA Director
  • Deputy Secretary of State
  • Deputy Secretary of Defense
  • Special personnel designated solely by the President in writing

Sources said late Wednesday Clinton likely violated two different types of Dept. of Defense SAP protocols. Since nuclear response is part of the sensitive national plan for nuclear war operations, all of its schematics are covered under both “Intelligence SAPs” and “Operation and Support SAPs,” sources said. Both contain Top Secret information.

“Targeting options by ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missiles), air or sea, launch order, launch procedures and response are some of the most secretly guarded tenets of national security and nuclear war policy,” a Pentagon source said. “It’s truly incredible that (nuclear) response time as part of an ERO (Emergency Response Option) is now out there in the public domain to our adversaries.”

U.S. Defense sources said according to developed U.S. counterintelligence, military officials in China, North Korea, Syria, Russia, Iran and even actors like ISIS had no previous definitive intelligence to determine the U.S. nuclear response time, especially during an ERO, prior to Clinton’s admission Wednesday night. Sources reluctantly acknowledged her calculations were accurate.

“Any time frame calculated would have merely been an educated hypothesis, absent leaked documents and there have been no such breaches,” the DOD source said.

Clinton has come under fire time and time again for mishandling national security secrets via email, telephone and secure facsimile during and after her tenure as secretary of state. Her mishandling of classified and top secret intelligence sparked a year-long investigation by the FBI and various Congressional committees which continue to examine Clinton’s lackluster security controls with and attitude toward protecting some of the nation’s most sensitive data which she stored on an unprotected home server in the basement of her Chappaqua, New York home during her post at Foggy Bottom.

Clinton, just this week, unleashed a series of campaign ads painting Trump as a loose cannon who should never be in control of nuclear secrets and weapons. Clinton trumpeted the seemingly ill-timed ads Wednesday night at the debate prior to her rant divulging nuclear secrets herself.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: All (#0)

I think Snopes and the other sources mentioning nuclear response times as being unclassified are wrong in that the times they mention are not confirmed and therefore speculative. However, a presidential nominee receives current classified intelligence briefings and therefore when Hillary mentioned the nuclear response time, this became a different matter from the times mentioned in unconfirmed and speculative sources.

According to Pentagon sources, the information Clinton disseminated publicly is Top Secret intelligence governed under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP) which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The specific details of the country’s nuclear response time discussed by Clinton, sources said, are only known by a handful of individuals outside top military brass, including the following “need-to-know” (NTK) officials …
I spent 24/7 every third week for eight years on alert duty next to an aircraft loaded with 5 nukes, ready to launch and attack targets upon receipt of an authenticated go code. During my assignment to a Strategic Air Command Combat Ready Crew, our launch time was highly classified. I simply cannot believe that nuclear decision times and launch times are no longer classified today.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-10-21   0:00:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Gatlin (#1)

If this is still supposed to be secret, it is a poorly kept secret. Publication of four minute launch time is apparently as harmless as claiming a launch time capability of thirty seconds flat. It essentially says we can launch before incoming missiles can land. The public claim may be optimistic.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-nuclear-weapon-launch/

To Launch a Nuclear Strike, Clinton or Trump Would Follow These Steps

By Dave Merrill, Nafeesa Syeed and Brittany Harris
September 7, 2016

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have repeatedly accused each other of lacking the fitness, temperament and qualifications, to be commander-in-chief. Clinton has said Trump isn’t someone “we can trust with nuclear weapons.” Trump has called Clinton “close to unhinged.” How much power does the president alone have to launch a nuclear strike? Bloomberg News asked Bruce G. Blair, a former Minuteman missile-launch officer and research scholar at Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security, to spell out the step-by-step procedure.

The president considers a nuclear strike

The commander-in-chief’s power is clear: He or she has sole authority to use nuclear weapons.

The top brass is brought in

Before initiating military action, the president convenes a conference with military and civilian advisers in Washington and around the world to talk through options. In the White House, the call takes place in the Situation Room. If traveling, the president is patched in on a secure line. A key participant in the meeting: the Pentagon’s deputy director of operations, an officer in charge of the National Military Command Center, also known as the “war room.” This around-the-clock operations center is responsible for preparing and ultimately transmitting a launch order from the president. The head of all U.S. strategic nuclear forces at Strategic Command in Omaha would probably also be asked for a briefing on strike options.

[Time elapsed: less than one minute]

The consultation lasts as long as the president wishes, but if enemy missiles are heading toward the U.S. and the president must order a counterstrike, the consultation may last just 30 seconds. The tight time line raises the risk of launching hastily on a false warning.

The president decides to launch

Some advisers may try to change the president’s mind or resign in protest—but ultimately, the Pentagon must comply with the commander-in-chief’s order.

The order is verified

The senior officer in the Pentagon war room must formally authenticate that the person ordering the strike is indeed the president. The officer reads a “challenge code,” often two phonetic letters from the military alphabet, such as “Delta-Echo.” The president retrieves the “biscuit,” a laminated card the president or military aide carries at all times, and finds the matching response to the challenge code: “Charlie-Zulu,” for instance.

The order goes out

The war room prepares the launch order, a message that contains the chosen war plan, time to launch, authentication codes and codes needed to unlock the missiles before firing them. The encoded and encrypted message is only about 150 characters long, about the length of a tweet. It is broadcast to each worldwide command and directly to launch crews.

[Time elapsed: two or three minutes]

The submarine and ICBM crews receive the message within seconds of the broadcast. Just a few minutes have passed since the initial conference call. Launch crews take over

Launch message in hand, the crews open locked safes to obtain sealed-authentication system (SAS) codes prepared by the National Security Agency and distributed throughout the military’s nuclear chain of command. They compare the SAS codes in the launch order with those in their safes.

If the missiles are launched from a submarine:

The captain, executive officer and two others authenticate the order. The launch message provides the combination to an on-board safe holding the “fire-control” key needed to deploy the missiles. Missiles are ready for launch about 15 minutes after receiving the order.

If the missiles are launched from land:

Five launch crews in various underground centers control a squadron of 50 missiles. Each crew consists of two officers. The individual teams are spread miles apart. Each receives the orders, opens safes and compares their SAS codes to those sent by the war room. If they match, the crews enter the message’s war plan number into their launch computers to re-target missiles from their peacetime targets in the ocean to their new targets. Using additional codes in the message, the crews enter a few more keystrokes to unlock the missiles before turning launch keys retrieved from their safe. At the designated launch time, the five crews turn their keys simultaneously, sending five “votes” to the missiles.

Mutiny is unlikely

It takes just two “votes” to launch the missiles. So even if three two-officer ICBM crews refuse to carry out the order, it won’t stop the launch.

Missiles are launched

About five minutes may elapse from the president’s decision until intercontinental ballistic missiles blast out of their silos, and about fifteen minutes until submarine missiles shoot out of their tubes. Once fired, the missiles and their warheads cannot be called back.

Bruce G. Blair is a research scholar at the Program on Science and Global Security at Princeton University and a co-founder of Global Zero.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-10-21   1:19:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: nolu chan (#2)

The president considers a nuclear strike
The commander-in-chief’s power is clear: He or she has sole authority to use nuclear weapons.

[…] The president decides to launch
Some advisers may try to change the president’s mind or resign in protest— but ultimately, the Pentagon must comply with the commander-in-chief’s order.

He is correct when he states that only the president can order a nuclear strike. But, there has been an exception(s) where Pentagon would not “comply with the commander-in-chief’s order.” Raymond Lockey, advisor to the US Congressional Advisory on Energy and Security, can explain it as well as I can and it saves me time to quote him.
If the US President at the spur of the moment decided to launch a nuclear missile as a first strike attack, could anyone stop him?

Yes, it is was is unofficially called the “two man” rule with regards to any nuclear launch. [The president is not subject to the “two man rule” but I believe the rest of his statement is correct]. And it actually happened for the first known time during the Nixon Administration and President Nixon’s pending impeachment. At that time, not sure of the psychological state of mind of President Nixon, both the Secretary of Defense (the first cabinet member in the peeking order who assumes the “second man” role within the two man rule on agreeing to a nuclear pre-emptive launch) and the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon agreed to have the military officer who is always within close proximity to the Commander in Chief, with the “football”—or the secure briefcase with the nuclear authorization and launch codes—was instructed to “stand down” and literally to place himself in communicado to the President. The military office was instructed to only report directly to the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs; in effect, they committed treason, but under the circumstances their reasoned actions preserved their ability to monitor and control any errant act by the President if he should attempt to do something unthinkable in his state of mind.

Many people outside of the military, and federal government service at higher levels, are unaware that the US military, while serving the nation under the political restraints of the chain of command—with the President as the political control in the duty of the office as Commander in Chief—is obligated under both military law, tradition and the US Constitution to protect and preserve the nation against all foes both foreign and domestic. They also are bound by the Geneva Convention of which the United States is a signator, which dictates not only the use of certain types of weapons (interestingly though, nuclear weapons—the greatest threat—is not included) as well as a prohibition on the use of any military force directed against civilians. The US military’s officers also in their oath of office are bound to uphold the law and not agree to any order which is, in their opinion, illegal. So while the Secretary of Defense and the Joints Chiefs entered into an ad hoc agreement to completely “slow down” any attempt by President Nixon to order a pre-emptive launch, and instituted a series of back channel impediments meant specifically to block and subvert the process if any such order were given, they never reached the “Rubicon” and had to decide whether to cross the line and refuse an outright order or not.

The reality is that the President’s cabinet is organized in a peeking order within the two man” rule, with the Secretary of Defense the head of the priority list of cabinet officials; and if the first cabinet member refused to consent to the pre-emptive launch, the President could go down the list until theoretically he found a cabinet secretary who would agree. Not even the vice president is included in the process at this level. It has never happened before, so it is an open question as to whether all cabinet secretaries would desist or one of them would agree. And if one agreed, what the Joint Chiefs would do.

I hope I answered your question, although there is no precedent other than what happened during the Nixon Administration to point to in order to know just what would happen. Having served, my best educated guess is clearer heads would prevail. In fact, there is a little discussed protocol to declare the President incompetent without going through the legal process of having a court make that assessment and assigning what basically would be a transition of power to the vice president. If pressed, I have little doubt that the Joint Chiefs—all patriots, intelligent and highly educated and experienced officers—would make the right decision. I want people to realize that whist many incorrectly assume that the military and its offices live for war and want to fight whenever possible, they are probably the staunchest guarantors within our government, and advocators, of peace. As military officers they know firsthand the consequences of war—especially a nuclear war. If anything, their positions are always being the strongest and most capable military on the planet in order to prevent war. I think we should all understand their goal is to protect and preserve the nation and its citizens.

Raymond Lockey, advisor to the US Congressional Advisory on Energy and Security
https://www.quora.com/If-the-US-President-at-the-spur-of-the- moment-decided-to-launch-a-nuclear-missile-as-a-first-strike-attack-could- anyone-stop-him.

Also see NYT story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/science/donald-trump-nuclear-codes.html? _r=1 .

Gatlin  posted on  2016-10-21   3:23:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

        There are no replies to Comment # 6.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com