Title: This U.N. official accidentally crushed his own throat right before he was set to testify against Hillary Clinton Source:
Intellihub/SHTF Plan URL Source:https://www.intellihub.com/this-u-n ... stify-against-hillary-clinton/ Published:Jun 29, 2016 Author:Mac Slavo Post Date:2016-06-29 07:52:53 by Deckard Keywords:None Views:681 Comments:8
It must be coincidence, right?
Call it conspiracy theory, coincidence or just bad luck, but any time someone is in a position to bring down Hillary Clinton by testifying they wind up dead. In fact, there’s a long history of Clinton-related body counts, with scores of people dying under mysterious circumstances.
Perhaps the most notable is Vince Foster. Foster was a partner at Clinton’s law firm and knew the inner workings of the Clinton Machine. Police ruled that death a suicide, though it is often noted that Foster may have been suicided.
Now, another official has found himself on the wrong end of the Clintons. That John Ashe was a former President of the United Nations General Assembly highlights the fact that no one is safe once in their sights.
And as you might have guessed, there are major inconsistencies with Ashe’s death. It was not only conveniently timed because Ashe died just a few days before being set to testify against Clinton in a corruption case, but official reports indicated he died of a heart attack.
The problem, however, is that police on the scene reported Ashe died when his throat was crushed during a work-out accident.
The New York Post’s Page Six reported that after Ashe was found dead Wednesday, the U.N. claimed that he had died from a heart attack.Local police officers in Dobbs Ferry, New York, later disputed that claim, saying instead that he died from a workout accident that crushed his throat.
Adding to the mysterious nature of Ashe’s death was the fact that he had been slated to be in court Monday with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, from whom he reportedly received over $1 billion in donations during his term as president of the U.N. General Assembly.
And then there was this: During the presidency of Bill Clinton, Seng illegally funneled several hundred thousand dollars to the Democrat National Committee.
BYRNE: I feel so strongly that people need to know the real Hillary Clinton and how dangerous she is in her behavior. She is not a leader. She is not a leader.
SEAN: She does not have the temperament?
BYRNE: She doesn’t have the temperament. She didn’t have the temperament to handle the social office when she was First Lady, she does not have the temperament.
SEAN: She’s dishonest.
BYRNE: She’s dishonest, she habitually lies, anybody that can separate themselves from their politics and review her behavior over the past 15 years…
Byrne is the author of the newly published book Crisis Of Character – a first-hand Clinton exposé.
The answer to this is for people to speak up, loudly and suddenly and publicly, so that the information is already out there.
Go to a lawyer in private first, swear it all out in affidavits under penalty of perjury, then just go public.
Don't hold it all close to the vest until contacted by the right person.
Blurt it out, blast it to the Internet and the media. And make the point that you're not depressed, never considered suicide. Say flatly that if you end up dead, it is because you have been murdered by whomever it is you are outing.
Consider Breitbart, supposedly walking around with the smoking gun, holding it close to the vest, fearful, knowing what the Clintons have done, and Obama, and the GOP too.
But now consider something: have the Clintons or Obama EVER sued for defamation? No! Scumbags don't DARE sue for defamation, because they're GUILTY, and they cannot stand up to judicial cross-examination.
Breitbart should have been smart enough - any reporter dealing with such things should be smart enough - to realize that there is no "power" in secrecy, only danger of death.
Monica Lewinsky's life was probably SAVED by the fact that Linda Tripp put it all right out there in public - BOOM! The dress, all that.
When you're dealing with people who will kill to keep things secret, if you have their secrets you are more likely to die if you hold things back. You have to FIRST, suddenly, surprise attack, put it ALL out there.
And the thing is, even if you're wrong about some part of it, the Clintons are never going to take you to court, because they will have to answer questions under oath.
All of this assumes that people really care.
Truth is, people vote their own broad interests.
Do we all really know that the Clintons are corrupt? Of course we do. Always have. Do we all really know that Trump this, or the Bushes that? Of course.
People who support Hillary don't support her because they think she's pure. People who support Trump don't support him because they think he's an angel.
People support politicians because they perceive their own self-interest being protected or advanced because of that politician's partisan stance and general policy alignment. They are hiring a political gun and they don't REALLY care about all of the moral and criminal flaws of the person they are hiring. They're not happy about it, but they really don't care.
It's like soldiers and sailors. There's always been a lot of sexual depravity in the military - there are blue-eyed children all over the Orient.
Nobody on our side of the pond really cares. We want the military to do what it does FOR US. We know that military people do some other things FOR THEMSELVES, and while we me quail about that when confronted with it, we just as easily forget about it and cease caring as soon as the moment passes.
Because in the end politicians and soldiers are hired guns. We're interested in what's good for US, and we don't REALLY give a damn about their sins and crimes.
Perfect people don't exist, and while there are Puritan fanatics out there who demand perfection, Puritan fanatics are always a narrow, perpetually disgruntled, perpetually powerless group, because the People, writ large, do not demand high moral or ethical standards, merely performance.
Well killing people because they expose their secrets is too much imo.
I don't feel good for Clinton doing that. And with Clinton the situation with the Middle East and terrorism will get worse. I see Trump as less corrupt and will solve the terrorism issues better. What about you?
(1) He will appoint Supreme Court justices from that list he gave out, and that will secure a reasonable Supreme Court (by my standards) for the next decade.
(2) He will make peace with Russia, saving us billions per year and avoiding the bankrupting expense of a new Cold War.
I think he'll be blocked by Congress on most else - those two things are within his control.
I don't think Congress will appropriate enough money to build the wall, and when Trump uses tricks to start, Congress will stop him.
And I think Congress will move aggressively against any effort on his part to restrict immigration or change trade deals. They are bought and paid for, most Congressmen are, and most of the ones who aren't nevertheless believe in the free-trade/open borders mantra.
So I think that Trump will largely be stymied in his first term efforts. except for Russia and the Court, and that will start to produce good fruit right away.
So, that's why I support Trump.
With Hillary I get an arch-liberal court forever, a new Cold War, and a Spanish-speaking future.
