[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Stephen Hawking baffled by dynamics of Trump's popularity
Source: AP
URL Source: http://elections.ap.org/content/ste ... led-dynamics-trumps-popularity
Published: May 30, 2016
Author: staff
Post Date: 2016-05-30 14:46:19 by buckeroo
Keywords: None
Views: 6077
Comments: 62

LONDON (AP) — Stephen Hawking understands the workings of the universe — but says he cannot fathom the popularity of Donald Trump.

The British astrophysicist told ITV's morning show Monday that the presumptive Republican Party candidate for U.S. president "is a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator."

Hawking also appealed to British voters to vote to keep the United Kingdom inside the European Union in a June 23 referendum. He said remaining within the EU provided essential support for British scientific research as well as its economy and security.

He said: "Gone are the days we could stand on our own against the world. We need to be part of a larger group of nations, both for our security and our trade."


WoW! Even Hawking is baffled by the "Trump Black Hole."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: buckeroo (#0)

he cannot fathom the popularity of Donald Trump.

The British astrophysicist told ITV's morning show Monday that the presumptive Republican Party candidate for U.S. president "is a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator."

Sounds to me like he perfectly understands the popularity of Donald Trump.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   16:51:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: buckeroo (#0)

Stephen Hawking understands the workings of the universe — but says he cannot fathom the popularity of Donald Trump.

Just proves even book smart people don't know it all.

Trump kicking everyone's butt is easy to explain and comprehend if you can be honest to yourself.

Justified  posted on  2016-05-30   17:05:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: buckeroo (#0) (Edited)

Stephen Hawking baffled by dynamics of Trump's popularity

I can understand how he is ... It is hard to define truly amazing.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-05-30   17:30:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: buckeroo (#0)

We need to be part of a larger group of nations, both for our security and our trade."

RUBBISH! Hawking should stick to what he knows and stay out of politics and economics. It is clear the freedom loving Brits find the EU regulation stiffling and if they want less of it they should not yield to scare tactics. Britain wants to protect its borders, it cannot do so from within the EU. Britain allowed migration from other parts of the empire and understands better than most the consequence. A nation can develop without political integration with other nations, a nation can successfully trade without political integration. If Britain wants to leave the greater german economic bloc they should do so

paraclete  posted on  2016-05-30   18:56:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Justified (#2)

Trump kicking everyone's butt is easy to explain and comprehend if you can be honest to yourself.

Absoloutly. Spot on.

The people of this country are gonna see a win by a greater landslide than they've seen in over 100 years.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-05-30   19:01:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: buckeroo (#0)

Even Hawking is baffled

Hawking has no accomplishments save celebrity.

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   19:10:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GrandIsland (#5)

The people of this country are gonna see a win by a greater landslide than they've seen in over 100 years.

Greater than Harding's 1920 win by 60-34 over Cox, eh? I'm bookmarking this one.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   19:11:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: buckeroo (#0)

Demagogue: a leader championing the cause of the common people.

Yep. That's Trump.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-05-30   19:13:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: ConservingFreedom (#7)

Bookmark it shitbag. It's my prediction. I could be wrong...who knows. I'm confident that Trump will WIPE THE FLOOR WITH SLICK WILLYS WHORE.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-05-30   19:15:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Roscoe (#6)

Hawking has no accomplishments save celebrity.

'In his work, and in collaboration with Penrose, Hawking extended the singularity theorem concepts first explored in his doctoral thesis. This included not only the existence of singularities but also the theory that the universe might have started as a singularity. Their joint essay was the runner-up in the 1968 Gravity Research Foundation competition.[155][156] In 1970 they published a proof that if the universe obeys the general theory of relativity and fits any of the models of physical cosmology developed by Alexander Friedmann, then it must have begun as a singularity.[157][158] [159] In 1969, Hawking accepted a specially created Fellowship for Distinction in Science to remain at Caius.[160]

'In 1970, Hawking postulated what became known as the second law of black hole dynamics, that the event horizon of a black hole can never get smaller. [161] With James M. Bardeen and Brandon Carter, he proposed the four laws of black hole mechanics, drawing an analogy with thermodynamics.[162] To Hawking's irritation, Jacob Bekenstein, a graduate student of John Wheeler, went further—and ultimately correctly—to apply thermodynamic concepts literally.[163][164] In the early 1970s, Hawking's work with Carter, Werner Israel and David C. Robinson strongly supported Wheeler's no-hair theorem that no matter what the original material from which a black hole is created it can be completely described by the properties of mass, electrical charge and rotation.[165][166] His essay titled "Black Holes" won the Gravity Research Foundation Award in January 1971.[167] Hawking's first book, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, written with George Ellis, was published in 1973.[168]

'Beginning in 1973, Hawking moved into the study of quantum gravity and quantum mechanics.[169][168] His work in this area was spurred by a visit to Moscow and discussions with Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich and Alexei Starobinsky, whose work showed that according to the uncertainty principle rotating black holes emit particles.[170] To Hawking's annoyance, his much- checked calculations produced findings that contradicted his second law, which claimed black holes could never get smaller,[171] and supported Bekenstein's reasoning about their entropy.[172][170] His results, which Hawking presented from 1974, showed that black holes emit radiation, known today as Hawking radiation, which may continue until they exhaust their energy and evaporate.[173][174][175] Initially, Hawking radiation was controversial. However, by the late 1970s and following the publication of further research, the discovery was widely accepted as a significant breakthrough in theoretical physics.[176][177][178] Hawking was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) in 1974, a few weeks after the announcement of Hawking radiation. At the time, he was one of the youngest scientists to become a Fellow.[179][180]' - https://en.wikip edia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#Career

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   19:17:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GrandIsland (#9)

I could be wrong

ROTFL! You backpedal faster than Lance Armstrong pedals forward.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   19:18:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: misterwhite (#8) (Edited)

Demagogue: a leader championing the cause of the common people.

Source? Dictionary.com defines it as "a person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people."

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   19:20:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Justified (#2)

Hawking isn't smart he is a f'n retard.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-05-30   19:23:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#13)

Hawking isn't smart he is a f'n retard.

Tell us about your discoveries in general relativity and quantum physics, Brainiac.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   19:33:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: ConservingFreedom (#12)

Source?

Merriam-Webster

misterwhite  posted on  2016-05-30   19:45:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: misterwhite (#15)

Merriam-Webster

What Merriam-Webster actually says:

1 : a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power

2 : a leader championing the cause of the common people in ancient times

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   19:56:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: ConservingFreedom (#14)

He believes if two monkeys fuck they make humans. A FUCKING RETARD!

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-05-30   19:56:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Roscoe (#6)

"Hawking has no accomplishments save celebrity."

Wasn't he the guy who walked close to the event horizon of a black hole and a chocolate bar melted in his pocket? And that led to the invention of the iPhone?

So there's that.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-05-30   19:56:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: ConservingFreedom (#16)

There you go.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-05-30   19:57:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: ConservingFreedom (#10)

In 1970, Hawking postulated what became known as the second law of black hole dynamics, that the event horizon of a black hole can never get smaller.

Theories with no applications are not accomplishments, especially when they have been refuted.

published last week on arXiv, says: “there are no black holes”- SCIENCE & TECH 27 JANUARY 2014

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   19:58:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: misterwhite (#19)

You gave as the definition a misleadingly truncated version of the secondary definition. There we go indeed.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   19:58:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Roscoe (#20)

Theories with no applications are not accomplishments,

By your shabby 'logic' all of quantum chromodynamics, for example, contains no accomplishments.

especially when they have been refuted.

published last week on arXiv, says: “there are no black holes”- SCIENCE & TECH 27 JANUARY 2014

Not a refutation, boob: "peers have yet to have a go at assessing his idea".

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   20:07:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: ConservingFreedom (#22)

"peers have yet to have a go at assessing his idea".

His being Hawking's. He refuted himself.

Bwahahaha!

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   20:10:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: ConservingFreedom (#21)

"You gave as the definition a misleadingly truncated version of the secondary definition."

I gave an old, yet valid, definition.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-05-30   20:13:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: misterwhite (#18)

Wasn't he the guy who walked close to the event horizon of a black hole and a chocolate bar melted in his pocket?

He's the G.R.R.M. of celebrity "scientists."

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   20:17:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Roscoe (#23)

He refuted himself.

Still wrong, boob - he offered a hypothesis with only the supporting argument that it resolved an apparent paradox in a way arguably more satisfying than other proposed resolutions. And if later science shows earlier science to be incorrect, the earlier science remains no less an accomplishment, cf. Isaac Newton.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   20:18:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: ConservingFreedom (#26)

if later science shows earlier science to be incorrect

His fame rests on that incorrect "science" (empty theorizing), which he now refutes.

Therefore, you want people to support Hillary. Or Epstein. Or that naked sicko who was prancing about at the Libertine convention.

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   20:24:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Roscoe (#27)

His fame rests on that incorrect "science" (empty theorizing),

No, theorizing backed by rigorous calculation.

which he now refutes.

Wrong no matter how often you repeat it.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   20:26:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: ConservingFreedom (#28)

theorizing backed by rigorous calculation

Just like Global Warming.

Just out of curiosity, what would you say was the single most useful application of the black hole theorizing Hawking now rejects?

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   20:33:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Roscoe (#29)

what would you say was the single most useful application of the black hole theorizing

Perplexing boobs like you.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   20:38:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: ConservingFreedom (#30)

I figured you would punk out.

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   20:38:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Roscoe (#31)

Quantum chromodynamics has no useful applications - dismiss it if you like, but your betters know better.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   20:43:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: ConservingFreedom (#32)

Quantum chromodynamics

You're such a craven coward. Let's try again:

Just out of curiosity, what would you say was the single most useful application of the black hole theorizing Hawking now rejects?

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   20:49:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Roscoe (#33)

Let's try again:

Try putting 2 and 2 together, dimwit.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   20:55:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: ConservingFreedom (#34)

Try putting 2 and 2 together

And the coward flees again.

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   21:00:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Roscoe (#35)

Ah, what the hell, I'll spoonfeed you: black hole theory has had no useful applications to date. So what?

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   21:02:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: ConservingFreedom (#36)

Do you fuck monkeys?

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-05-30   21:07:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: A K A Stone (#37)

"black hole theory has had no useful applications to date."

Do you fuck monkeys?

No, that's not the black holes we're talking about.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-05-30   21:10:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: ConservingFreedom (#38)

The retard thinks he is the offspring of monkeys. So hawkingshithead thinks you fuck your monkey wife.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-05-30   21:12:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: ConservingFreedom (#36)

black hole theory has had no useful applications to date

Stephen Hawking: “there are no black holes”

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-30   21:13:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 62) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com