[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 15, 2016
Author: Randy E. Barnett
Post Date: 2016-05-15 00:25:26 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 3958
Comments: 9

Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People

Randy E. Barnett

Released: Apr 19, 2016. 325 pages.

A concise history of the long struggle between two fundamentally opposing constitutional traditions, from one of the nation’s leading constitutional scholars—a manifesto for renewing our constitutional republic.

The Constitution of the United States begins with the words: “We the People.” But from the earliest days of the American republic, there have been two competing notions of “the People,” which lead to two very different visions of the Constitution.

Those who view “We the People” collectively think popular sovereignty resides in the people as a group, which leads them to favor a “democratic” constitution that allows the “will of the people” to be expressed by majority rule. In contrast, those who think popular sovereignty resides in the people as individuals contend that a “republican” constitution is needed to secure the pre-existing inalienable rights of “We the People,” each and every one, against abuses by the majority.

In Our Republican Constitution, renowned legal scholar Randy E. Barnett tells the fascinating story of how this debate arose shortly after the Revolution, leading to the adoption of a new and innovative “republican” constitution; and how the struggle over slavery led to its completion by a newly formed Republican Party. Yet soon thereafter, progressive academics and activists urged the courts to remake our Republican Constitution into a democratic one by ignoring key passes of its text. Eventually, the courts complied.

Drawing from his deep knowledge of constitutional law and history, as well as his experience litigating on behalf of medical marijuana and against Obamacare, Barnett explains why “We the People” would greatly benefit from the renewal of our Republican Constitution, and how this can be accomplished in the courts and the political arena.

View this title on Amazon.com

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tpaine (#0)

http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=45874

Title: Our Republican Constitution
Source: Amazon
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 21, 2016
Author: Randy Barnett
Post Date: 2016-04-21 18:54:18 by tpaine

nolu chan  posted on  2016-05-15   4:22:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tpaine (#0)

View this title on Amazon.com
Your link does not work. I found it here at
https://www.harpercollins.com/9780062412287/our-republican-constitution
Copyright © 2016 HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-05-15   4:42:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: tpaine (#0)

I doubt if there is anything terribly new about the subject in this book .The divide over the Constitution has shaped the political debate since the founding. Barnett is a libertarian so I think I know where he stands . But I'll give it a try .

Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)

tomder55  posted on  2016-05-15   6:15:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: nolu chan (#1) (Edited)

This is part of my comments in the original OP.

When Madison examined the deficiencies of the Confederation before the Constitutional Convention he concluded that the fault lies in the people themselves . In Sec 11 of 'Injustice of the laws of States.' He writes :"If the multiplicity and mutability of laws prove a want of wisdom, their injustice betrays a defect still more alarming: more alarming not merely because it is a greater evil in itself, but because it brings more into question the fundamental principle of republican Government, that the majority who rule in such Governments, are the safest Guardians both of public Good and of private rights."

Madison wrote that we must be more realistic about popular majorities. The largest factions of special interests can always outvote the people of smaller special interests . But there is no safeguard for the rights of the minority or individuals in that system .

The Constitution that was crafted by the founders attempted to address this. "To secure the public goods and private rights against the danger of such a faction ,and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed."(Madison Federalist Papers #10)

Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)

tomder55  posted on  2016-05-15   9:29:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: tomder55 (#4)

"The Constitution that was crafted by the founders attempted to address this."

They should have put in term limits for Congress.

Far too many career politicians spend the vast majority of their time seeking re-election and fundraising rather than doing their job. And this is compounded by the fact that the big sources of campaign cash are the PACS, special interests, and lobbyists -- whose desires often compete with the people's.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-05-15   9:47:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tpaine (#0)

Are you selling books?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-05-15   11:21:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#5)

They should have put in term limits for Congress.

Far too many career politicians spend the vast majority of their time seeking re-election and fundraising rather than doing their job. And this is compounded by the fact that the big sources of campaign cash are the PACS, special interests, and lobbyists -- whose desires often compete with the people's.

Yes they probably should've . Congress addressed President term limits with an amendment . But they will never amend it to limit their own terms. Lucky for us ,the founders put in a provision for the Constitution to be amended by another process that bypassed Congress initiating the process.

Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)

tomder55  posted on  2016-05-15   13:41:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: misterwhite (#5)

They should have put in term limits for Congress.

Or at least have explicitly recognized the rights of the people of each State to proscribe eligibility requirements for the candidates who seek to represent them in Congress.

"The dissent, written by Justice Thomas and joined by Justices Rehnquist, O'Connor, and Scalia, argued that nothing in the Constitution deprives the people of each State the power to proscribe eligibility requirements for the candidates who seek to represent them in Congress."

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-104srpt158/html/CRPT-104srpt158.htm

Roscoe  posted on  2016-05-15   13:57:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: buckeroo (#6)

Are you selling books?

No, -- I'm selling a republican form of government, and the constitution that supports it..

How bout you?

tpaine  posted on  2016-05-15   14:39:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com