International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Revealed: How the five wealthiest Gulf Nations have so far refused to take a single Syrian refugee
Source:
Daily Mail Online
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... sed-single-Syrian-refugee.html
Published: Sep 4, 2015
Author: Jay Akbar
Post Date: 2015-09-04 15:41:55 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1457
Comments: 7
More than four million Syrians have been forced to escape the never-ending civil war ravaging their country and the barbaric terror group carving a bloody trail across the Middle East. The vast majority live in overcrowded refugee camps in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt and Iraq - all under threat from ISIS - and record numbers are making the perilously long journey to Europe. Yet, as debate rages between politicians in Europe over how many they should take, nearby super-wealthy Gulf nations of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain have refused to offer sanctuary to a single Syrian refugee. Amnesty International's Head of Refugee and Migrants' Rights, Sherif Elsayid-Ali, described their inaction as 'shameful'. He said: 'The records of Gulf countries is absolutely appalling, in terms of actually showing compassion and sharing the responsibility of this crisis... It is a disgrace.' Scroll down for video Exodus: Wealthy gulf nations Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain have not offered to house a single one of four million Syrian refugees (pictured) to have fled the war-torn country Fury: A political cartoon pointed fingers at the Gulf nations for their inaction, with a caption which read: 'Refugees welcomed by: Saudi: 0, Kuwait: 0, Qatar: 0, Emirates: 0, Bahrain: 0' New homes: Most of the Syrian refugees who travel to Europe via countries like Libya and Turkey are looking to reach Germany Left with nothing, these refugees travel thousands of miles from the Middle East, through central Europe and across the Mediterranean to reach countries like Germany and Austria. Others have tried to sneak on boats, trains and trucks crossing the Channel to the UK. Almost 3,000 have died trying to reach Europe by sea this year, but hundreds more attempt the same life-threatening journey with their babies and young children every single night. The tragic death of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi who drowned trying to reach the Greek island of Kos from Bodrum, Turkey, inspired a seismic shift in the European attitude towards the 313,000 people who have reached the continent this year. None have been allowed to enter the (relatively) nearby Gulf nations, who all rank in the world's top 50 GDPs and have a combined military budget of more than £65billion, according to Arab expert Sultan Sooud al-Qassemi. He said: 'The Gulf must realise that now is the time to change their policy regarding accepting refugees from the Syria crisis. It is the moral, ethical and responsible step to take.' Bloody: Most Syrians are fleeing the perils of their home country where rebel-held towns like Ain Tarma (pictured) are shelled by the government and ISIS control vast parts of the nation Long way round: Most refugees travel thousands of miles from the Middle East, through central Europe and across the Mediterranean to reach countries like Germany and Austria - not to relatively nearby Gulf nations Catalyst: The tragic death of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi who drowned trying to reach the Greek island of Kos from Bodrum, Turkey, brought home the plight of tens of thousands of refugees None of the Gulf countries signed the 1951 Refugee Convention which defines a refugee 'outside the country of his nationality' because of 'fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality'. Syrians can still apply for 'costly' tourist visas and work permits to enter wealthier Gulf nations but they are rarely granted, according to the BBC. Gulf nations argue that accepting large numbers of Syrian refugees is a serious threat to the safety of its citizens because terrorists could hide themselves among civilians. They have donated large sums of money to help homeless refugees. According to ReliefWeb, the UAE has funded an entire refugee camp in Jordan which shelters tens of thousands of Syrians. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have donated funds, food, shelter and clothing to Syrias in Lebanon, Turkey and Jordan. In total, the Gulf states are thought to have given over £589m to the aid effort - but it is four times less than the United States has. The UK has given £918million to help deal with the impact of violence in Syria and Prime Minister David Cameron today announced Britain is increasing its aid for refugees to more than £1billion. Britain's contribution is more than Saudi Arabia's £387million , UAE's £359million and Qatar's £157,000 combined. The Gulf region 'has the capacity to quickly build housing for the refugees,' according to the Managing Editor of the Quartz news website, Bobby Ghosh. Only the United States has given more to the humanitarian effort in Syria since 2011 than the UK, according to the Financial Tracking Service Action: British Prime Minister David Cameron promised the UK would take in 'thousands' of Syrian refugees Mass migration: Most migrants and refugees - including those in Syria - are fleeing war and persecution in their home countries and heading to Europe He wrote: 'The giant construction companies that have built the gleaming towers of Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh should be contracted to create shelters for the influx. 'Saudi Arabia has plenty of expertise at managing large numbers of arrivals... There's no reason all this knowhow can't be put to humanitarian use.' The majority of Syrian refugees have been taken in by Middle Eastern countries. Around 1.9million live in Turkish refugee camps, 1.1million in Lebanon, 629,000 in Jordan, 249,000 in northern Iraq and Egypt has housed 132,000, according to the United Nations. But there was a massive surge in those trying to reach Europe this year and asylum applications had topped 300,000 by early August. More than 89,000 were from Germany, which expects to take in more than 800,000 refugees from all over the world this year, and 62,000 for Sweden. The UK has promised to rehome 'thousands', said Prime Minister David Cameron, who only this week claimed accepting more people was not the simple answer to the crisis. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: cranky (#0)
Nature abhors a vacuum. Western sexual mores have created a vacuum, into which rushes Arabs, Africans, Latinos and Asians. Those at the top of the economic pyramid profit immensely from the cheap exploitable labor, so the borders cannot be effectively closed. Net result: cultural replacement. The only solution? A return to fertility. And in the modern post- industrial world, that requires the redistribution of substantial wealth from its excessive concentration in the top 5% of society. There is an inexorable economic inevitability to the whole problem that is obivous to those who look.
They all probably figure they already have too many Arabs,so why let more in? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
A frightening thought given the current state of child-rearing in western culture, not to mention demographics. There are three kinds of people in the world: those that can add and those that can't
The alternative is what we doing: suppressing our own fertility and being replaced in the land by the fertility of others. WHites do not have children. Latinos and Muslims do. Therefore, America will be Latino, and Europe will be Muslim. Game over. Strike the colors and accept it. The world of nice, limited controlled populations is not the world in which we live. And it never will be. So, we either predominate, or we are dominated. We have chosen the path of decline, so decline we will, and be replaced. We see it happening all around us.
When our women cease to be feminine our societies become feminine.
Done and done. There are three kinds of people in the world: those that can add and those that can't
There are plenty of feminine women having plenty of babies. They speak Spanish and Chinese and Tagalog and Arabic. In America and Europe it's the whites, specifically, us - we (alone) are the ones in a death spiral. We're in the death spiral because we HAD a middle class standard of living, but we allowed a tax and trade code to be established over us that took 40% of the national wealth out of our hands and gave it to the super-rich. That left us without job security, and economically stressed, all at the same time that we were having a Sexual Revolution and using sex for recreation. Net result: a demographic death spiral. Denial is just another form of acceptance of death. To DO something about it requires significant, sustained wealth redistribution, to bring the top 5%'s 85% stake of the wealth down to about 33% of the wealth. They'll still be plenty wealthy, but there will be enough for everybody else to live on, and have babies. Otherwise, teach your children Spanish.
#2. To: cranky (#0)
nearby super-wealthy Gulf nations of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain have refused to offer sanctuary to a single Syrian refugee.
#3. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
A return to fertility.
#4. To: cranky (#3)
A frightening thought given the current state of child-rearing in western culture, not to mention demographics.
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
So, we either predominate, or we are dominated. We have chosen the path of decline, so decline we will, and be replaced. We see it happening all around us.
#6. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
Strike the colors and accept it.
#7. To: nativist nationalist (#5)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]