[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: YEEhaw! This side-effect of the gay marriage ruling will make liberals EXPLODE
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://allenbwest.com/2015/06/yeeha ... ng-will-make-liberals-explode/
Published: Jun 27, 2015
Author: Allen West
Post Date: 2015-06-27 21:47:00 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 1554
Comments: 8

Yesterday, as you know, five justices on the SCOTUS redefined what marriage is in America and also found the time to violate the concept of federalism. They decided that an individual’s behavioral choice was grounds to create a new “right” in the U.S. Constitution. Now of course there are those of you who are somewhat despondent, but just know that in every storm there is a rainbow — quite sure y’all get my tongue-in-cheek comment. Yep, since now the SCOTUS has determined it can bequeath a right to marriage across all 50 states, there is an interesting point to be made.

As reported by BearingArms.com, “If you’re following any of the various media outlets this morning, you’re probably aware that the U.S. Supreme Court has just extended gay marriage to all 50 states. The Supreme Court ruled Friday that same-sex couples have a right to marry nationwide, in a historic decision that invalidates gay marriage bans in more than a dozen states. Gay and lesbian couples already can marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia. The court’s ruling on Friday means the remaining 14 states, in the South and Midwest, will have to stop enforcing their bans on same-sex marriage. The outcome is the culmination of two decades of Supreme Court litigation over marriage, and gay rights generally.”

The Court used Section 1 of the Fourteen Amendment to justify its argument, which reads: Amendment XIV Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law, which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Now here is the kicker, as the writer articulately brings to light: “By using the Constitution in such a manner, the Court argues that the Due Process Clause extends “certain personal choices central to individual dignity and autonomy” accepted in a majority of states across the state lines of a handful of states that still banned the practice. The vast majority of states are “shall issue” on the matter of issuing concealed carry permits, and enjoy reciprocity with a large number of other states. My North Carolina concealed carry permit, for example, was recognized yesterday as being valid in 36 states, which just so happened to be the number of states in which gay marriage was legal yesterday. But 14 states did not recognize my concealed carry permit yesterday. Today they must.

Using the same “due process clause” argument as the Supreme Court just applied to gay marriage, my concealed carry permit must now be recognized as valid in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.“

Yes folks, there is a standing right called the Second Amendment, which grants the right to keep and bear arms, and that specifically granted right shall not be infringed. So, the SCOTUS does not need to have a court case and prolonged legal, judicial activism — that right exists.

So, since I have moved from Florida to Texas, my concealed weapons permit is not only transferrable here, but all across the country, in all fifty states — or fifty-seven if you are President Obama. Yeehaw! Thanks to the LGBT community for making it very clear, my constitutionally declared right MUST be recognized in every state. Not only is it my right to keep and bear my arms (weapons) but that personal choice is central to my individual dignity and autonomy — the protection of the unalienable rights granted to me by the Creator, the first of which is life. Hot doggone, I just cannot wait to hear the liberal progressive socialist anti-gun argument against this premise — which is now established!

Perhaps I should probably remind folks of some of the quotes of the Founding Fathers on the Second Amendment:

“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!” — Benjamin Franklin

“I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” — George Mason

“No free government was ever founded, or ever preserved its liberty, without uniting the characters of the citizen and soldier in those destined for the defense of the state…such area well-regulated militia, composed of the freeholders, citizen and husbandman, who take up arms to preserve their property, as individuals, and their rights as freemen.” — Richard Henry Lee

“[W]hat country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” — Thomas Jefferson

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent on others for essential, particularly for military, supplies.” — George Washington

“An armed person is a citizen, and unarmed person is a subject” — Allen B. West…I know, I’m just a regular fella, but just thought I’d sneak this one in.

Now, I suppose someone will say the words of Franklin, Mason, Lee, Jefferson, and Washington are invalid because of some lame excuse like — “ya know they owned slaves.” But the point is simple and easy to comprehend. If the SCOTUS could create a right that is truly non-existent in the Constitution using the 14th Amendment, then it seems reasonable and logical to use the same Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and equal protection to extend the concealed carry right to all 50 states.

So here is the call to action: since we are coming up on our 239th Independence Day celebration, let’s all call the White House and inform them that we CCL owners are going to be traveling for the Independence Day holiday and we plan on carrying our weapons wherever the heck we please. And if anyone decides to stop an American citizen and challenge his or her Second Amendment right, then let’s discuss the violation of federalism by the SCOTUS mandating same-sex marriage. As a matter of fact, we expect the ATF to start issuing NATIONAL CCL cards to all of us who are current holders of valid CCLs — heck, we know the DHS is planning on printing ID cards for illegal immigrants.

Therefore, celebrate your 4th of July knowing that the SCOTUS just solidified our right to keep and bear arms — and that no state has the “right” to infringe upon our Second Amendment right. If the violation of federalism works ok for LGBTs — then it works well for gun owners!

Yeehaw!


Poster Comment:

I like Allen West. True Patriot.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Using the same “due process clause” argument as the Supreme Court just applied to gay marriage, my concealed carry permit must now be recognized as valid in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.“

That would be nice Allen but the SCOTUS has shown itself to have no problem making inconsistent rulings.

Its not law, its 'Social Justice'

TrappedInMd  posted on  2015-06-28   4:00:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)

The Second Amendment contains the words "well-regulated".

The Fourteenth does not.

Let's see Allen West try some open carry in NYC or Chicago or the Beltway.

I'm not holding my breath waiting for it to happen.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-28   5:08:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

The Second Amendment contains the words "well-regulated".

The Fourteenth does not.

Let's see Allen West try some open carry in NYC or Chicago or the Beltway.

I'm not holding my breath waiting for it to happen.

West made a well reasoned argument for nation wide concealed carry.

Your comment comparing the milita clarifier in the 2nd, and the clear wording of the 14th, isn't... Please explain...

tpaine  posted on  2015-06-28   5:30:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: tpaine (#3)

Please explain...

My remarks were quite clear.

Allen West will not be doing what he is suggesting that others should do, namely, to violate strictly enforced gun laws in Blue anti-gun states like NY/CA/IL/NJ, etc.

Go pester someone else. I get tired of querulous old crackpots on these forums. No wonder the Right is losing across the board.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-28   8:35:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#0)

"Using the same “due process clause” argument as the Supreme Court just applied to gay marriage, my concealed carry permit must now be recognized as valid in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.“

Not necessarily. The due process argument, if used, only requires consistency among the states.

The U.S. Supreme Court can just as easily determine that the second amendment does not protect concealed carry. And that decision would apply to all 50 states.

They woudn't do that, you say? There's precedent. 100 years ago it was against the law in most states to carry concealed because only criminals and ne'er-do-wells needed to hide their intentions.

Everyone assumes incorporating the Bill of Rights is a good thing. "When the court rules the way I want, it applies to all 50 states and that's good." Uh-huh. And how often does that happen?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-28   9:30:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: TooConservative (#4)

TooConservative (#2) --- The Second Amendment contains the words "well-regulated". The Fourteenth does not. --- Let's see Allen West try some open carry in NYC or Chicago or the Beltway. --- I'm not holding my breath waiting for it to happen.

West made a well reasoned argument for nation wide concealed carry.

Your comment comparing the milita clarifier in the 2nd, and the clear wording of the 14th, isn't... Please explain...

My remarks were quite clear. ----- Allen West will not be doing what he is suggesting that others should do, namely, to violate strictly enforced gun laws in Blue anti-gun states like NY/CA/IL/NJ, etc.

Your sound like a querulous old crackpot, claiming to know how West will protest in the anti-gun states..

Go pester someone else. I get tired of querulous old crackpots on these forums. No wonder the Right is losing across the board.

You're upset because I dared to question your ability to make a reasoned argument. Get help, and calm down.

tpaine  posted on  2015-06-28   12:33:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite, Y'ALL (#5)

West ---- "Using the same “due process clause” argument as the Supreme Court just applied to gay marriage, my concealed carry permit must now be recognized as valid in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.“

Whitey --- Not necessarily. The due process argument, if used, only requires consistency among the states. --- The U.S. Supreme Court can just as easily determine that the second amendment does not protect concealed carry. And that decision would apply to all 50 states.

Not true. Certainly, the SCOTUS could issue such an opinion, but the other branches of government, including State governments, would not be bound to obey, as such opinions are NOT valid law.

They woudn't do that, you say? There's precedent. 100 years ago it was against the law in most states to carry concealed because only criminals and ne'er-do- wells needed to hide their intentions.

Yep, that was the unconstitutional 'precedent' years ago. We know better now.

Everyone assumes incorporating the Bill of Rights is a good thing. "When the court rules the way I want, it applies to all 50 states and that's good." Uh-huh. And how often does that happen?

Not often, Whitney's hype aside. -- And when it does happen, our system of checks and balances will correct the infringement, eventually. --- We repealed prohibition and we can repeal/ignore stupid 'laws' about marriage.

tpaine  posted on  2015-06-28   12:58:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: tpaine (#6)

Your sound like a querulous old crackpot, claiming to know how West will protest in the anti-gun states..

He's a total hypocrite. He won't be breaking state or local gun laws. He's all talk. You have to be a moron to fall for his schtick.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-28   15:04:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com