[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: Senate Bill Forces Gun Owners to Buy “Smart Guns”
Source: freedomoutpost.com
URL Source: http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/s ... -gun-owners-to-buy-smart-guns/
Published: Jun 22, 2015
Author: Tim Brown
Post Date: 2015-06-22 07:11:15 by CZ82
Ping List: *Bang List*     Subscribe to *Bang List*
Keywords: None
Views: 3055
Comments: 28

Senate Bill Forces Gun Owners to Buy “Smart Guns”

Tim Brown June 15, 2015

Communist Gun Grabbing Massachusetts Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren introduced legislation last week which is not only unconstitutional, but also a very dumb idea (pun intended). According to the bill, "anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed."

The "Handgun Trigger Safety Act" is touted as a means of gun safety. However, at its root, it is a bill that is unconstitutional due to the fact that the government has been given specific instructions not to infringe on the rights of the people when it comes to arms.

The legislation would mandate that within ten years, "anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed."

Furthermore, within five years of the bill becoming law, it would ban the "manufacture in the United States a handgun that is not a personalized handgun."

Senator Markey issues a press release in which he stated, "The epidemic of gun violence in America is not preordained, it is preventable. In the 21st century, we should use research and advances in technology to our advantage and save lives from tragic and needless gun violence. These bills will keep guns out of the hands that of those who shouldn't have them and provide better information about what is causing gun violence and what can be done to prevent it. These are sensible proposals that everyone, regardless of political party or affiliation, should be able to support. I thank Rep. Maloney for her partnership on this effort, and I recommit to stopping the hemorrhaging of lives and spirit that gun violence causes for families in Massachusetts and across the country."

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) said, "Some would have us believe that the laws currently on the books are sufficient to address the tens of thousands of gun related deaths that occur each year. A few extremists even oppose basic public health research to help us understand why gun violence has reached epidemic proportions. They also oppose implementing new smart gun technologies that can help reduce the tragic number of accidental shooting deaths each year, many of which have taken the lives of young children. The majority of Americans support sensible steps to reduce the bloodshed in our streets, schools, churches and other public spaces. The bills I am introducing with Senator Markey today would help save lives and make our communities safer."

Maloney has no idea what she is talking about, or perhaps she does and this is just her sales pitch. However such actions will not result in safety, but probably will result in more dead people like Carol Bowne, who was stabbed to death in cold blood because New Jersey couldn't get her a gun permit within the allotted 30 days.

However, speaking of Maloney, she helped advance The Firearms Risk Protection Act, which would require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. Again, this is unconstitutional and does nothing to stop criminals. All of these measures are attempts at gun confiscation.

The legislation is absolutely ridiculous given a recent report about the chapter 11 restructuring of a smart gun company, which gun grabbing politicians, like Markey and Warren have endorsed.

Part of the issue is the cost and a lack of actually keeping criminals from obtaining weapons that can be used in the commission of a crime. As I have written previously:

To make matters worse, what criminal will acquire a gun that they have to deal with such restrictions? None, and that's the point. These guns will be marketed to law-abiding citizens, not criminals.

While the iP1 is a .22 caliber with a ridiculous price of $1,800 (one of many really, really bad marketing moves), the company is also attempting to produce the iP9, a 9mm version.

These types of guns are simply gun control in another form. I'm glad the company has had to file chapter 11. Now, let's hope they have to file chapter 13 bankruptcy.

There is not doubt in my mind that the American people will not stand for this in the same manner they didn't stand for Obama's gun grab following Sandy Hook, nor the backdoor attempt at violating the Second Amendment when the unconstitutional ATF sought to ban AR-15 ammunition.

Smart guns are a bad idea. Forcing people to buy smart guns is a really dumb idea.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/senate-bill-forces-gun-owners-to-buy-smart-guns/#7A7RtztHRgQseciH.99 Subscribe to *Bang List*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#2. To: CZ82 (#0)

" Smart guns are a bad idea. " Yes they are !

"Forcing people to buy smart guns is a really dumb idea. " Yes it is, and it is not going to happen. I will not buy one, and I do not know anyone that would. Would you? I didn't think so

We need to ban the idiots that come up with these goof ball ideas!

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-22   13:59:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Stoner (#2)

" Smart guns are a bad idea. " Yes they are !

I can see instances where they might be useful.

For instance, a cop or security guard (or a citizen) would worry less that an assailant might take his gun and then shoot him with it, as in the Zimmerman case against Traybon. If the handgun security was tight enough, it would give robbers less incentive to steal guns (which are a top target for burglaries at present).

So...not entirely useless.

We have a lot of new tech coming online. You might be able to build a basic interlock very small and lightweight with a palm print reader built-in so others couldn't shoot your gun.

I'm not saying we must have them or force people to get them. And this current law is just stupid. But they could be useful. And tech is moving very quickly these days.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-22   20:35:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: TooConservative (#3)

For instance, a cop or security guard (or a citizen) would worry less that an assailant might take his gun and then shoot him with it

In all honestly,that has never been a worry of mine.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   7:53:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Palmdale, also, sneakypete, GrandIsland (#7)

In all honestly,that has never been a worry of mine.

In the Zimmerman case, he said he pulled the gun and shot because he thought Traybon was going for his gun, intending to take it and shoot him with it.

In the Ferguson incident, the officer was initially struggling with Michael Brown for control of his own gun.

So, regardless of what you might worry about as a civvy, there may be reasons why other people might need or want a gun. And other reasons why PDs and others might want such a gun for their employees.

For instance, we have a lot of cop-shoots-some-schmo articles here. In how many of these was the risk of the perp grabbing the cop's gun a factor in their decision to shoot-before-the-assailant-grabs-your-gun? I'm not sure how we determine that but it has to play some role in a cop's decision making, especially if he is up against a physically capable assailant.

Even if "smart guns" were pricey, I think a lot of PDs might want this kind of gun for their officers. Because it only takes a fraction of a second and a little luck for a perp to make a play for a cop's gun.

Think about the case the Court just rejected on San Fran's requirement that handguns have to be kept in a lockbox or have a trigger lock when not in use. With smart guns, that case changes entirely because you're no longer pitting security against safety in gun possession.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   8:32:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: TooConservative, Stone (#8)

I'd rather chance my gun being taken from me than trust a "smart gun". I just don't trust them to go BANG, every time I pull the trigger.

I'm with Stone, bad idea and a slippery slope.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   8:43:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GrandIsland (#10)

I'd rather chance my gun being taken from me than trust a "smart gun". I just don't trust them to go BANG, every time I pull the trigger.

I think there are PDs that would like the idea.

Of course, the technology would have to improve considerably and be pretty fool-proof.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   8:51:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: TooConservative (#11)

I think there are PDs that would like the idea.

I think there are PD administrators and city fathers who would like the idea.

I'm not so sure rank and file cops would be all that crazy about it,though.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   9:39:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

#18. To: sneakypete (#15)

I think there are PD administrators and city fathers who would like the idea.

I'm not so sure rank and file cops would be all that crazy about it,though.

I agree on both.

The PD leaders and city councils will recognize that fewer lawsuits will mean they have more money to put actual cops on the street.

I think the PDs will be the first to adopt. The prices will be high and the manufacturers will have to convince the public that the smart guns are reliable. Equipping PDs with them will settle a lot of misgivings.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23 10:03:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com