[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Secularists vs. Suicide Bombers Secularists vs. Suicide Bombers by Patrick J. Buchanan, May 29, 2015 Print This | Share This "What apparently happened was that the Iraqi forces just showed no will to fight.
We can give them training, we can give them equipment; we obviously cant give them the will to fight." Thus did Defense Secretary Ash Carter identify the root cause of the rout of the Iraqi army in Ramadi. Disgusted U.S. military officers say the 1,000 ISIS fighters who overran Ramadi were outnumbered by the defenders 10 to 1. Why did the Iraqi army run? And what motivated the fighters of ISIS to attack a city whose defenders so vastly outnumbered them? According to battle reports, the assault began when dozens of captured U.S. armored vehicles and trucks, laden with explosives, were driven by ISIS volunteers to blast huge holes in the defenders lines. Why do all the martyrs seem to be on their side? And why is it our side that, all too often, shows "no will to fight"? Iraqis are not cowards. From 1980 to 1988, their fathers died in the scores of thousands defending their country against Iran. But if Iraqis would die for dictator Saddam Hussein, why does todays Iraqi army seem reluctant to fight for the democratic Haider al-Abadi? And the story of Iraq is the story of Syria. Four years into that civil-sectarian war, the al-Qaida Nusra Front has carved out a sector in Idlib, as have the Islamic State terrorists in Raqqa. Bashar Assads army, though bleeding, is still fighting. And the Free Syrian Army we backed? Defunct. Some fought, but others defected to the jihadis, fled or sold their weapons. In Yemen, the Houthi rebels came down from the north to seize Sanaa, drive the president into exile, occupy Aden, and capture huge stockpiles of American weapons. The U.S.-backed army crumbled. Again, why do these rebels seem willing to fight for what we see as antiquated beliefs, but all too often our friends do not fight? Perhaps the answer is found in Thomas Babington Macaulay: "And how can man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his gods?" Tribe and faith. Those are the causes for which Middle Eastern men will fight. Sunni and Shiite fundamentalists will die for the faith. Persians and Arabs will fight to defend their lands, as will Kurds and Turks. But who among the tribes of the Middle East will fight and die for the secular American values of democracy, diversity, pluralism, sexual freedom and marriage equality? "Expel the Crusaders from our lands!" there is a cause to die for. Go back to 1983. A jihadist of the Amal militia drove a bomb-laden truck into the Marine barracks in Beirut. In 2000, two suicide bombers steered a tiny boat up alongside the USS Cole in Aden harbor, stood, saluted and blasted a hole in the hull, almost sinking the warship. Nineteen young men volunteered to ride those planes into the Pentagon and the Twin Towers on 9/11. The "underwear bomber" and "shoe bomber" were prepared to go down with those planes. Murderers and would-be murderers all. But according to a new Al-Jazeera poll, the warriors of the Islamic State have many Muslim admirers. In Afghanistan, we have fought the Taliban for 13 years. Yet still they fight. And many fear the Afghan army we trained and armed at a cost of tens of billions will disintegrate when we go home. Why do the Taliban seem to have in abundance a will to fight that appears far less present in the Afghan army units we have trained? These questions are highly relevant. For they are about the ultimate question: Can the West win in the Middle and Near East? In almost all of the wars in which we have been engaged, those we back have superior training, weapons and numbers. Yet, for whatever makes men willing to fight and die, or volunteer for martyrdom, the Islamic State, al-Qaida, and the Taliban have found the formula, while our allies have not. To be a martyr for Allah, to create a new caliphate, to expel the infidels and their puppets, these are causes Islamic man will die for. This is what ISIS has on offer. And the offer is finding buyers even in the West. What do we have on offer? What do we have to persuade Iraqi Sunnis to fight to return their Anbar homeland to the Iranian-backed Shiite regime in Baghdad? Of our Arab allies, the Qataris, Saudis and Gulf Arabs are willing to do air strikes. And the Kurds will fight for Kurdistan. But if the future belongs to those willing to fight and die for it, or to volunteer to become martyrs, the future of the Middle East would seem fated to be decided by Sunni tribesmen, Shiite militia, ISIS and al-Qaida, Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. In the Middle East, the time of the True Believers appears at hand. Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World. To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com. COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Pat, as a history buff, forgets that the secular "west" (and it has been secular for nearly 150 years now) had fought these holy rollers before up until the Japanese suicide bombing pilots. Outside of a couple of set backs here or there (the Mahdi's Fuzzy Wuzzies in Sudan, the Sioux at Little Big Horn and a few minor battles here and there) the secular mildly Christian west always won and it did so by slaughtering every man, woman and child of the enemy until the enemy was broken. We all think the British are cute and gay in their romance comedy movies but the British were beasts - and they were the more civilized of the Europeans towards the natives. In the Sepoy Rebellion the British wiped out a whole Indian cities and left the bones to bleach in sun. As late as the 20th century the British (Jallianwala Bagh massacre in 1919) the British shot into a demonstrating crowd of about 1,000 people. The British commander was hailed a hero in the British press. Churchill wanted to gas the Kurds in Iraq who were causing the empire trouble. The South African Boers, who were sort of holy roller Calvinists gave the British a lot of grief until the British put them into concentration camps until they started to die off of natural causes. The Americans, the most happy go lucky people of all, carried out the Wounded Knee Massacre because the Indians were doing a Ghost Dance as a prelude to a holy war uprising. The Indian wars ended after that and the concentration camps known as "reservations" took care of the rest. We dropped 2 nukes on the Japanese and their living god, on whose behalf the Japanese wanted to fight to the death, sued for for peace and declared he was not a god. That is the nature of the thing. It is reality and I am not trying to hide from it. These jihadis can be easily defeated. Kill them all until we don't need to do so. Or stay home.
Fallible and uninspired lying assholes have assumed dominion. Again.
we taught them how to politically correct fight. We taught them that if they so much as strip search the will be charged with torture and if the dare to pee on a dead terrorist they will be court-martialed. Perhaps they ran because on one answered the phone when they called mohummedit barak hussien obama for permission to return fire. mohammed obama might have been playing golf or being sodomized, who knows.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|