[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Poison Watch
See other Poison Watch Articles

Title: Monsanto knew 35 years ago that its glyphosate-soaked ‘food’ causes cancer
Source: Intellihub
URL Source: https://www.intellihub.com/monsanto ... ate-soaked-food-causes-cancer/
Published: May 14, 2015
Author: Ethan A. Huff | Natural News
Post Date: 2015-05-15 22:57:51 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 6055
Comments: 17

Key data outlining the toxicity of glyphosate (Roundup) was recently uncovered, revealing that Monsanto knew about the cancer-causing effects of its best-selling herbicide more than 35 years ago, as did the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and yet neither entity chose to make this information known in the interest of public health.

Both Monsanto and the EPA knew full well, at least as early as 1981, that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup herbicide, causes cancer in mammals. Earlier studies conducted during the late 1970s and early 1980s appear to have documented cancer-causing effects from glyphosate in rats, mice and dogs, though this information was buried by Monsanto with the blessing of the EPA.

Using “trade secrets” as an excuse to keep the findings of these studies confidential, Monsanto successfully cherry picked and manipulated its cohort of study data to suggest that glyphosate was safe, and the rest is history. Except that previously hidden memoranda that have since come to light reveal a whole lot more about the true nature of this pervasive chemical pesticide.

According to Sustainable Pulse, uncovered EPA memos from the early 1980s point to research showing that glyphosate caused significant damage to the kidneys of rats. These same studies also noted hyperplasia in the rats, which is considered a very early and necessary step in the formation of cancerous tumors.

In 1981, the EPA scrutinized this data and pressed Monsanto for more information before granting a NOEL, or “no observed adverse effect level,” for glyphosate. But less than one year later, Monsanto successfully obfuscated the data and convinced the EPA that glyphosate was safe under the guise that conflicting data was suddenly a “trade secret.”

“The evidence shows that by 1981 both Monsanto and the EPA were aware of malignant tumours and pre-cancerous conditions in the test animals which were fed small doses of glyphosate in the secret feeding experiments,” said Dr. Brian John for GM-Free Cymru, about the facts.

“Although concerns were expressed at the time by EPA committees, these concerns were later suppressed under the weight of conflicting evidence brought forward by Monsanto, some of it involving the inappropriate use of historical control data of dubious quality. None of these studies is available for independent examination.”

Monsanto hid glyphosate dangers by substantially reducing exposure levels in test mice

One of the ways that Monsanto covered up the true dangers associated with glyphosate was to substantially reduce the amount of the chemical given to study rats. Now-exposed EPA memos reveal that test rats in the new studies were suddenly being given only 1/100 of the amount of glyphosate given in earlier studies, with no explanation.

A 1986 EPA memo admitted that this was a curious move by Monsanto, adding that the glyphosate doses tested were nowhere near the “maximally tolerated dose.” If the glyphosate doses had remained the same, remarked the then Oncogenicity Peer Review Committee, “tumours might have been induced.”

“The effect of glyphosate on endocrine tissue such as breast and prostate, or even placenta, is disruptive at least and an increased incidence of endocrine neoplasia is likely to be seen in National Statistics,” added retired academic pathologist Dr. Stanley Ewen, noting that glyphosate’s association with pre-neoplastic changes in experimental mice were never revealed as they should have been.

“The Glyphosate Task Force denies the involvement of glyphosate in human malignancy despite their knowledge of many reports of lymphomas and pituitary adenomas in experimental animals dosed with glyphosate.”

The tobacco industry, as you may recall, never really recovered from its shameful legacy of lying to the public about the safety of cigarettes. But Monsanto’s massive cover-up of glyphosate’s cancer-causing effects takes evil to a whole new level, as the multinational corporation not only lied about the herbicide’s safety but actively manipulated a federal agency tasked with protecting public health in the process.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

Sue them and put them out of business.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-05-15   23:15:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

Sue them and put them out of business.

I think you miss the point of the article: government bureaucracy was in-bed with private industry. You can't sue Mother-Nature ... or didn't you know?

buckeroo  posted on  2015-05-15   23:22:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0)

Key data outlining the toxicity of glyphosate (Roundup) was recently uncovered, revealing that Monsanto knew about the cancer-causing effects of its best-selling herbicide more than 35 years ago, as did the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), ...

and Congress and yet none chose to make this information known in the interest of public health.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-05-16   6:42:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

Sue them and put them out of business.

Sue? Go before the same men and women dressed in black that draw their paychecks from the same g0vt that has been protecting monsanto since before agent orange in Nam?

Sorry my friend, but suing will do nothing but suck up scarce resources and make the lawyers richer.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-05-16   6:44:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: BobCeleste (#4)

Choose the venue carefully. Sue them in federal court in Vermont.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-05-16   7:25:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: buckeroo (#2)

"government bureaucracy was in-bed with private industry."

Was?

What changed? Why was this study released? What happened?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-05-16   8:50:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Deckard (#0)

I have this garden. Every year I have problems with these morning glories. This year I rounded up the whole field. A few times to kill everything. Now I have it tilled up since last Sunday. There are now hundreds if not thousands of these damned morning glories popping up. I started hitting them with Round up again on Thursday. Then Friday there are even more popping up. So I've been going around spraying a little bit on everything popping up. I plan on doing the same today. I usually have it planted by now but I was delaying to reduce the weeds this year. Despite this article I will go spray some more today. Then I'll probably put some black or red plastic down to keep the weeds out. Morning glories suck.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-05-16   9:04:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)

Morning glories suck.

Apparently they do.
I planted a bunch of 'Heavenly Blue' MG seeds decades ago.
They were beautiful! And now they are the problem of the person
I sold that house to. (Boy do those suckers grow! Whew!)

Chuck_Wagon  posted on  2015-05-16   15:17:33 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Chuck_Wagon (#8)

How did you not know they are truly noxious weeds?

Too bad you didn't have to reap what you sowed.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-05-16   22:36:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: TooConservative (#9)

Prolific beautiful flowers - not 'noxious weeds'.
Goodness!

Chuck_Wagon  posted on  2015-05-19   17:05:40 ET  (3 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Chuck_Wagon (#10)

Why don't you just plant some bindweed if you like agricultural hazards that much? They have pretty white flowers.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-05-19   17:13:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: TooConservative (#11)

Your bindweed flowers look very similar to moonflowers...

Chuck_Wagon  posted on  2015-05-19   23:21:21 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Chuck_Wagon (#12)

That just makes me want to get out my sprayer and mix up some 2-4-D so I can "water" them.

Bindweed and morning glory, once established for a few years, can take 25 years or more of steady eradication to kill out their root systems. You can use stuff like Tordon to get more time before they come back but then you have put some pretty toxic stuff into the ground where your well water comes from.

Pretty flowers, my ass.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-05-20   4:23:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: TooConservative (#13)

I'm spraying and spraying and they are popping up and popping up.

I'm going to get some platic. It works.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-05-20   7:46:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: A K A Stone (#14)

I'm going to get some platic. It works.

Certainly, in a garden/flower/shrub area, it works better unless you're willing to spray very carefully under the right weather conditions and keep spraying steadily for 10, 15, 25 years (depending on how deep the roots are).

For home/garden, the plastic is almost certainly the best.

The idiotic town I'm in has allowed bindweed to grow all over the place and done nothing but mow it (which only spreads it faster). It's a disaster. Anyone with a farming outlook is just horrified by it when the "pretty flowers" start blooming. It's shocking negligence.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-05-20   9:01:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: TooConservative (#13)

Pretty flowers, my ass.

LOL!

Chuck_Wagon  posted on  2015-05-20   15:18:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: TooConservative (#13)

Okay, okay - to heck with dang 'pretty flowers' -
we'll just stck with lavender azaleas instead - okay? (Geesh...)

Chuck_Wagon  posted on  2015-05-21   17:58:19 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com