United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: U.S. Army FORCES Cadets to Wear High Heels to Promote Feminist Campaign
Source:
Prison Planet
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/u-s-arm ... promote-feminist-campaign.html
Published: Apr 21, 2015
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2015-04-23 13:17:42 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 21626
Comments: 95
Cadets at Temple University were threatened that their careers would be finished if they refused to participate in a feminist campaign to promote the completely debunked college rape culture myth by wearing red spray painted high heels. Imagine what ISIS or the Russian military is thinking when they see these images. Third wave feminism has poisoned EVERYTHING, even the U.S. Military. UPDATE: Infowars was contacted by a former US Army servicemember who told us that his unit – Delta Company, 1st Battalion, 2nd Infantry Regiment, 172nd Infantry Brigade – was also FORCED to participate in the ‘Walk a Mile in Her Shoes’ event in 2011. “I was deployed in Afghanistan during this time, but my comrades in the rear told me this event was a MANDATORY,” he writes. “As a former medic, I know that the only way out of this was to lie about injuries or pull some form of guard duty at this time.” CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 87.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
Before this nonsense is finished, commanders will be ordering the troops to strip down and charge the enemy without weapons and yelling, " make love, not war!"
I worked for the current CoS of the Army in two previous assignments. Once he gets all the facts of this some heads are going to roll. Big conservative football player Italian don looking voluntarily bald Generals don't put male Soldiers or cadets in women's shoes.
Please keep me informed of his actions, I, while certainty bowing to your knowledge of the Army, doubt that any heads will roll. Generals are to interested in their retirement incomes and not interested in the well being of the junior, O-5 and below, officer corps or troops.
Some Generals are Army 'puritans.' Meaning they know the PC garbage hurts the Army. Yet, the wiley ones, they also know when to pick and choose their 'battles.' If they 'fell on the sword' for every stupid thing the civilian political leaders did or implemented there would be no good generals left. Sometimes they just wait it out for calmer seas. Your USMC Generals do a good job of this to preserve the Corps. For example, the Marine Corps was 'forced' to accept women in their advanced infantry training for officers. They obliged of course...but none of the female officers passed the rigorous standards. They did not lower the bar so females could 'pass' and allow good Marines to be in harms way. The Army gets their 'test' this month as three women go off to Ranger school. I know plenty of athletic men with strong mental abilities not pass Ranger school. The question will be if the Army lowers their standards for the women to look PC or they do what the Marines did and say 'sure ladies come on in, now do this or you are out like the men.' We shall see. As I mentioned a few weeks back I am now a civilian Army trainer. The Soldiers we are getting in now are the same. Some are eager, aggressive, smart and fit and some are not. It has been like that for generations. Most don't get involved in the daily PC garbage and just do their job. It is the job of the officers and senior NCOs to shield the Soldiers from all that garbage coming from DC and the Pentagram. The only negative comments from my observations of Army units from civilian 'eyes' is the lost art of actually fighting battles. All the young leaders 'grew up' in Afghanistan and Iraq. They are very good at fighting insurgents but barely competent on fighting other armies, navies and air forces. It is because of this deficiency retired Army guys and gals work where we work.
The Clinton's hand-picked a female candidate to be "the first Green Beret",and had Army regulations changed because the physical requirements to be accepted into SFTG were deemed to be "sexist",and the ones she did have to meet,like the minimum pushup number,were done using "Female" pushups. She was ordained by the WH to be the "First female SF officer",and the "First SF Female General Officer". It was all about "shattering the glass ceiling" back then and getting females into combat command positions so they could become General Officers. I understand there was a lot of indirect pressure put on the SWC command by DA and the Clinton WH to make sure she passed,but she flunked out because the senior officers refused to play the game. I heard all about this maybe 3rd hand from others who had heard rumors,but nobody that was directly involved in it ever wanted to talk. Even I wouldn't be mentioning it today if it weren't for the fact that everyone involved at the time is safety retired now. IIRC,there were two 0-5's or O-6's (can't remember which at this point) that had their careers ended because they refused to follow DA and WH "suggestions",and held her to the same standards they held the male students. AFAIK,there hasn't been any female SFTG students since them. It is damn near impossible to flunk out a black or Hispanic student now,though. They just recycle them through the program and send them to a all-black cadre staff to work in a area that is predominately black. I haven't heard very many white SF NCO's bitch about this,but I have heard a couple of black senior SF NCO's get so mad over it they looked like they were going to explode,and I can't say that I blame them. All the hard work THEY put towards being legitimate graduates of the Special Warfare School was nullified by the AA graduates. Now anybody that sees them wearing a beret will think THEY were AA graduates,too. It should be mentioned that the AA graduate "program" didn't exist until after the two 0-5's were forced into early retirement over flunking out the woman candidate that was friends with Bubbette!,and the Clinton's made a lot of political officer promotions. I know of one LTC that was a radial anti-gun follower who broke into the house of one of his E-8's that had been arrested for drunk driving,and stole all his guns and ammo. Word was he had the guns and ammo dumped into Mott Lake. The E-8 threatened to have him and his Fan Boy SGM arrested for felony theft unless the LTC dropped the court-martial charges against him and let him retire with his rank,and that's how the LTC got out of it. He was also immediately re-assigned to a company in Thailand to allow the heat to die down around SWC over his actions,and damned if he wasn't back a year later with a promotion to O-6. SOB obviously had a Rabbi in the Pentagram or the DNC because he should have been forced into retirement instead of promoted. Once again,he was one of the graduates of the "Senior Officer SF Candidate Course",and didn't become SF until he was a 0-5,and he was totally incompetent. He is one of the reasons I quit working Robin Sage. He started to run his mouth at me one day during a area command meeting,and I told him to STFU because I wasn't in the army,didn't have to take his crap,and couldn't be court-martialed. He did STFU,but I was also hustled out of the tent by some senior NCO's standing at the back that knew me and were wanting to avoid trouble. The man was a total asshat,and had already lost the majority of the civilian assets that had been working with SFTG because of his arrogant attitude towards them,and some of them had been doing that stuff for 20+ years. The Army wasn't even allowed to use their farm property for training anymore,either. I spent almost 7 years on active duty with SF,and a few more years later on as a civilian contract employee,and I had NEVER seen or heard of any SF officer talking to or treating senior NCO's the way this man did. It was like he was royalty,and they were minimum wage employees that lived to serve him. I am GUESSING it was crap like this that resulted in Schoomaker being brought back on AD to be the Army COS. It had to be somebody like him because a lot of the AD senior officers by then were Clinton and Boy Jorge political appointees. The Army needed someone without personal knowledge or prejudices to weed out the bad from the good. This is PURE speculation on MY part,though. No one has ever said this to me,and I have never discussed it with anyone on active duty or retired. If I am wrong,it is all on me. The Army gets their 'test' this month as three women go off to Ranger school. Flat out,if any of them graduate,the standards were lowered. Even Olympic-grade female athletes would have a hard time graduating from Ranger School. It is without question the most physically demanding school in the entire US Army. Gym Rat young males flunk out on a regular basis because they just can't hack the physical requirements along with the mental requirements added to the lack of sleep and rest.
8 women, 184 men remain in Ranger School assessment www.armytimes.com/story/m...rap-week-update/26260827/ I read about this recently and it kind of shocked me and I sent the news item to several Ranger buddies...no response from them. I recall it being talked about in the past, but now the unbelievable reality is here. I enjoy reading your war stories,petey.
The word integrated and assessment is telling. Means they adjusted standards.
They had females enter West Point in 1976, I believe it was. Very controversial at that time, but somehow the institution survived and the women did well. Change is a challenging thing to those types of institutions, including Ranger School. I could tell you about Airborne School in the mid-1970s, but I don't want to reveal my age. They were segregated from us boyz back then.
That's a university environment. West Point commissions officers for all branches of the service. Ranger school is different. It is a place mostly infantry soldiers, NCOs and Officers go to be better infantrymen.
Where did you get that from? I feel safe saying 99% are commissioned in the Army.
Where did you get that from? I think he may have meant to say "West Point commissions officers for all branches of the ARMY,technical and administrative,as well as combat arms." Although it is true that officers from all career branches can apply for and be accepted for training at the Ranger School. Unless things have changed,a NCO needs to come from a combat arms branch of the army to be accepted,though.
Thanks for the clarification. I know in the old days a very select few opted to enter other services such as the Air Force or Navy. It was a paperwork nightmare but some of them succeeded. Others did in-service transfers while on active duty, again from the Army to maybe the Air Force or Navy. Very few, but it happened. More recently, they had some blue to green programs - from Navy/AF to Army - circa 2004 when the Army was hurting for recruits and the other services were healthy.
It had more to do with skill sets the Army dismissed 10 years prior. In Iraq and Afghanistan there was a high demand for spectrum managers and electronic warfare expertise. The Navy and Air Force had a glut of both and the Army was restarting their EWO program. But yes the Navy and AF were drawing down and the Army expanded during the height of OIF. So some in blue enlisted or transferred their commission to the Army.
It had more to do with skill sets the Army dismissed 10 years prior. In Iraq and Afghanistan there was a high demand for spectrum managers and electronic warfare expertise. The Navy and Air Force had a glut of both and the Army was restarting their EWO program. I have a niece that married a guy that enlisted in the Navy because he was having a tough time finding a good job,and off he went to language school to learn Arabic. Then off he went to serve with the US Army in Afghanistan as a interpreter. Last I heard he had been in the Navy about 6 years now,is already a E-6,and has yet to be assigned to the US Navy. You have to admit that it kinda sucks to join the Navy to avoid combat,and then get assigned to the Army as a translator/interpreter. I guess he is not on the front lines,and is living fat and happy with the big bucks he is earning and no taxes. Happy enough he re-enlisted,anyhow.
There are no replies to Comment # 87. End Trace Mode for Comment # 87.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#15. To: Don (#2)
#58. To: redleghunter (#15)
I worked for the current CoS of the Army in two previous assignments. Once he gets all the facts of this some heads are going to roll. Big conservative football player Italian don looking voluntarily bald Generals don't put male Soldiers or cadets in women's shoes.
#59. To: BobCeleste, CZ82, sneakypete, GarySpFc (#58)
Generals are to interested in their retirement incomes and not interested in the well being of the junior, O-5 and below, officer corps or troops.
#60. To: redleghunter (#59)
For example, the Marine Corps was 'forced' to accept women in their advanced infantry training for officers. They obliged of course...but none of the female officers passed the rigorous standards. They did not lower the bar so females could 'pass' and allow good Marines to be in harms way.
#61. To: sneakypete (#60)
#65. To: Fred Mertz, sneakypete (#61)
Twenty women qualified to attend the integrated Ranger School assessment after successfully completing the Army National Guard Ranger Training Assessment Course.
#66. To: redleghunter (#65)
#68. To: Fred Mertz, sneakypete (#66)
They had females enter West Point in 1976, I believe it was. Very controversial at that time, but somehow the institution survived and the women did well.
#69. To: redleghunter (#68)
West Point commissions officers for all branches of the service.
#73. To: Fred Mertz, redleghunter (#69)
West Point commissions officers for all branches of the service.
#84. To: sneakypete, redleghunter (#73)
I think he may have meant to say "West Point commissions officers for all branches of the ARMY,technical and administrative,as well as combat arms."
#85. To: Fred Mertz, sneakypete, CZ82 (#84)
More recently, they had some blue to green programs - from Navy/AF to Army - circa 2004 when the Army was hurting for recruits and the other services were healthy.
#87. To: redleghunter (#85)
More recently, they had some blue to green programs - from Navy/AF to Army - circa 2004 when the Army was hurting for recruits and the other services were healthy.
Replies to Comment # 87.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]