[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: Marco Rubio: I’d attend a gay wedding
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://fusion.net/video/120998/marc ... arriage-jorge-ramos-interview/
Published: Apr 16, 2015
Author: Brett LoGiurato and AMERICA with Jorge R
Post Date: 2015-04-16 06:48:26 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 14226
Comments: 87

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida), the newest and youngest official Republican candidate for president, has said he believes marriage should be “traditional”—between a man and a woman.

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him: If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

“If it’s somebody in my life that I care for, of course I would,” Rubio told Ramos in an interview on Wednesday.

“I’m not going to hurt them simply because I disagree with a choice they’ve made or because I disagree with a decision they’ve made, or whatever it may be,” he added. “Ultimately, if someone that you care for and is part of your family has decided to move in one direction or another or feels that way because of who they love, you respect that because you love them.”

Rubio spoke with Ramos about a variety of issues, including marriage equality, immigration reform, climate change, President Barack Obama’s move to normalize relations with Cuba, and which rapper or singer he’d like to perform at his potential 2017 inauguration.

In the early throes of his campaign, Rubio has positioned himself as the candidate of “tomorrow.” He has cast himself as a young, fresh alternative to other Republicans and to likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who he referred to in his announcement speech as the candidate of “yesterday.”

But his stance on gay marriage has led to questions on whether he’s more out of touch than Clinton with young people on certain issues. According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. On Tuesday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper called Rubio “the candidate of yesterday” on the issue of marriage equality.

Rubio said that while he personally opposes gay marriage, he would encourage people in favor to petition their state legislatures to permit same-sex marriages. He does not think the decision should be left up to courts, he said.

“I would point out that we live in a free society,” Rubio said. “If people want to change the definition of marriage, they should petition their state legislature, and they can have that debate in the political arena. Who I don’t think should be redefining marriage is the court system.”

Rubio, who is Catholic, noted that his faith also teaches that divorce is wrong, and he drew on that as a comparison to his personal feelings on gay marriage.

“But again, as I said, I’m a member of the Catholic faith that teaches, for example, that divorce is wrong,” Rubio said. “But if someone gets divorced, I’m not going to stop loving them or having them a part of our lives.”


Poster Comment:

He is now officially off the list. He was at the bottom. Sounds like a perfect candidate for queers that are sneaky.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

Just another "Conthervative" { uhhh } "But Progrethive" log cabin RINO.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   6:56:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Sounds like a perfect candidate for queers that are sneaky.

Hey, sneaky queers have to find a candidate to vote for too.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   7:04:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

Hey, sneaky queers have to find a candidate to vote for too.

I would think the vast majority of queers, sneaky or otherwise, will vote for KILLary.

Rubio might get just the sneaky Cuban queers.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-04-16   7:11:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TooConservative (#2) (Edited)

Hey, sneaky queers have to find a candidate to vote for too.

Fithcal TooConthervatism- TEAParrot Herman Cain edition.
====================

TP: Mr. Cain, you recently came under fire for your comments about the kind of people you would appoint to your cabinet. Would you be opposed to appointing an openly gay but qualified person to be in your cabinet?

CAIN: Nope, not at all. I wouldn’t have a problem with that at all. I just want people who are qualified, I want them to believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. So yep, I don’t have a problem with appointing an openly gay person. Because they’re not going to try to put sharia law in our laws.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=gsihc&cp=20&gs_id=25&xhr=t&q=Open+homosexual+Cain

=====================
HERMAN: What happens now?
Scott Toomey: Well, now, uh, Ken Mehlman, R. Clarke Cooper, Meghan McCain, Mary Cheney and I wait until nightfall, and then leap out of the Fithcally Conthervative log cabin, taking The Party(tm) by surprise -- not only by surprise, but totally unarmed!
HERMAN: Who leaps out?
Scott Toomey: Uh, Ken Mehlman, R. Clarke Cooper, Meghan McCain, Mary Cheney and I. Uh, leap out of the log cabin, uh and uh....
HERMAN: Oh....
Scott Toomey: Oh.... Um, l-look, if we built this large wooden Rhinocerous -- [twong]
ALL:  Run
away!  Run away!  Run away!  Run away!
      [splat]
 

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   7:12:33 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: GrandIsland (#3)

Probably the only sneaky ones left are priests or married guys in the closet.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   7:38:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: GrandIsland (#3) (Edited)

I would think the vast majority of queers, sneaky or otherwise, will vote for KILLary.

LOL. Ask TOO Conthervative if he's still a Cain fan.

libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=39119&Disp=4#C4

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   7:43:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#0)

According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry.

It's not about "allowing" them to do anything. It's about RECOGNIZING THEY HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS ANY OTHER CITIZEN.

Your,mine,or anyone else's approval or disapproval isn't relevant. RIGHTS are NOT dependent on the approval of others. Either we all have them,or none of us has them. If they require approval,they are requests for permission,not rights.

Why is this so hard for so many people to figure out?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   8:21:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: VxH (#1)

Just another "Conthervative" { uhhh } "But Progrethive" log cabin RINO.

So,you think the idea of having Second Class citizens that don't have the same rights as other citizens is a "conservative opinion"?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   8:22:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: TooConservative (#5)

Probably the only sneaky ones left are priests or married guys in the closet.

And a awful lot of those married guys in the closet seem to be really pissed they were "forced" to marry a woman.

It's almost like they are saying "I coulda had the man of my dreams if I had waited,and I'm pissed about it!" in the background.

Misery sure does love company,in all cultures.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   8:27:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete (#8) (Edited)

I think the deliberate proliferation of social cancer is as culturally self-destructive as it has always been documented to be.

Worshiping transhumanist/postgenderist cancer isn't "conservative".

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   8:34:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: TooConservative (#5)

Is everyone gay in America? That is all we hear about on the news it seems.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-16   11:23:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#0)

74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry.

The programming of the youth by Amerika's government indoctrination centers (schools), Hollywood and the MSM is going as planned.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts

Deckard  posted on  2015-04-16   11:30:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete (#9)

And a awful lot of those married guys in the closet seem to be really pissed they were "forced" to marry a woman.

I'm not so sure. Most of them married so they could have kids and a traditional nuclear family, the whole 2.2 kids in the suburbs with a dog and a minivan.

I think there are gays who will continue to go the daddy route, getting by with using some porn or a few sleazy hookups or a boyfriend on the side.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   11:41:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#0)

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him: If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

“If it’s somebody in my life that I care for, of course I would,” Rubio told Ramos in an interview on Wednesday.

Another good reason to write me in, I would not attend a sodomite wedding.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   12:27:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: BobCeleste (#14)

I attended my younger brother's three weddings; the most recent was about two years ago. I tried to get out of that one at the time because I was a bit financially strapped - he put enough pressure on me and offered free housing that I finally relented and attended. I was best man at his first wedding back in the 80s.

His wedding was in San Francisco and yes, all three of his wives are wimmins.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-16   12:35:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Pericles (#11)

Is everyone gay in America? That is all we hear about on the news it seems.

Apparently so. Yes, according to America's propagandist news outlets. (But...but...that must just be our bigoted, homophobic eyes doing the noticing.)

And if an American citizen opposed the perception that the gay slant on EVERYTHING is repulsive and sick on any level, they should expect to be ostracized, fired, or your business ruined. ALL sanctioned by this oppressive, un-constitutional gubmint of ours.

So in this vein, I hereby agree with you: This nation is a rotted fish carcass.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   12:45:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: VxH (#10)

I think the deliberate proliferation of social cancer is as culturally self-destructive as it has always been documented to be.

OK.

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with who,and who has rights and who doesn't have rights?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   12:55:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: TooConservative (#13)

Most of them married so they could have kids and a traditional nuclear family, the whole 2.2 kids in the suburbs with a dog and a minivan.

AND they wanted to appear to be normal and to be accepted as normal.

And who can blame them for that? Who wants to go through their lives having people screaming insults at them every day,and who wants to face rejection by their own family?

I think there are gays who will continue to go the daddy route,...

Of course they will. Remember,they are people just like everybody else,and most people want to have children. Which will probably save some heterosexual women from having to live with a lot of grief to keep their families together. Can't wait until we get to see their kids rebelling against them when the kids become teens. Prior to modern times,the only way they could have children was to marry someone of the opposite gender and try to pass as a heterosexual. I see less of that happening now and into the future,and predict most of the future "hookups" will be between lesbians and male homosexuals,and the hookups will take place in a lab somewhere.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:02:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Liberator (#16)

By concentrating on gay rights it really is an attack on religion by secularists because the Abrahamic religions are explicitly hostile to gays. By having people accept gays then the Bible is questioned and religion is negated.

Pericles  posted on  2015-04-16   13:03:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: BobCeleste (#14)

I would not attend a sodomite wedding.

Of course you would,and you have.

You do know that men and women can and often do commit sodomy together,right? When it comes to sodomy players,homosexuals are a tiny minority.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:04:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Fred Mertz (#15)

His wedding was in San Francisco and yes, all three of his wives are wimmins.

And chances all 4 of them are sodomites.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   13:05:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#21)

Back in our younger days we used to talk about blow jobs (from wimmins), but I've been polite enough not to ask this of the ones he married. I could guess tho!

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-16   13:10:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#12)

74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry.

The programming of the youth by Amerika's government indoctrination centers (schools), Hollywood and the MSM is going as planned.

The programming of yoots has gone even BETTER than planned. But then how can a Statist-Leftist-Fascist 24/7/365 campaign to lobotomize a captive audience fail?

Even if their frontal lobes remain intact after the usual social media assaults, these young people have had to repel and reject the non-stop homo-advocacy TV, movies, advertisements, and "education system." The good news: That 26% are rock-solid warriors for truth.

Especially depressing: When the demo of weak 50+ baby-boomers fall prey to Stockholm-Syndrome and begin accepting or even crusading for "gay marriage rights."

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:22:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Fred Mertz, Biff Tannen (#22)

Back in our younger days we used to talk about blow jobs (from wimmins)

Thanks for the MUCH needed gender clarification, Fred. Biffy will be disappointed :-(

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:24:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pericles (#19)

By concentrating on gay rights it really is an attack on religion by secularists because the Abrahamic religions are explicitly hostile to gays. By having people accept gays then the Bible is questioned and religion is negated.

SPOT ON.

This obvious assault and war on God makes it especially odd when so-called Christians embrace "gay" marriage, or even the magical "gay rights" lie.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:28:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: sneakypete (#18)

Of course they will. Remember,they are people just like everybody else,and most people want to have children. Which will probably save some heterosexual women from having to live with a lot of grief to keep their families together.

A lot of them married women with low sex drives or who had deep-set issues with regular sex. Often, the women knew in advance what they were getting into.

A lot of these sham marriages weren't so much a sham as a bargain between two people who knew what they both were getting into.

I knew a guy in college whose best friend was this girl. She had a half-dozen boyfriends in high school and college and he ended up sleeping with every one of them. Finally, she just married him. They ended up farming and raising five kids. Their lives, their choice. Sort of like a Will and Grace scenario where they actually ended up Married With Kids. Not everyone's cup of tea obviously.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-16   13:38:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: sneakypete, VxH (#17)

Does that [social cancer/cultural self-destruction] mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with who,and who has rights and who doesn't have rights?

It means there is STILL an age of consent and common sense expected of ANY proper civilization. But don't expect a thriving culture from one that endorses, teaches, and sanctions sodomy as "normal" sexual behavior.

To further address your question, you or any mutant or multi-gendered person can indeed legally have consensual sex with anyone else otherwise to my knowledge. So what "right" are you implying is deprived? (other than with non-human creatures and the under-aged?)

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: sneakypete, BobCeleste (#20)

You do know that men and women can and often do commit sodomy together,right?

Yes, but their respective relationship, identity, and act isn't based on a singular act of sodomy, NOR is it celebrated in the public domain as some kind of noble, liberating act that EVERYONE should also celebrate. WITH GUSTO.

When it comes to sodomy players,homosexuals are a tiny minority.

Chyeah, sooo "tiny" that according to social media, Yahoo News, Google, MSM, the Tee-bee networks, movies, and academia, "sodomy players" are this society's annointed High Priests of liberation and enlightenment.

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:46:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida)...has said he believes marriage should be “traditional”—between a man and a woman.

So Fusion’s Jorge Ramos asked him:

If someone in his family or on his staff were gay and getting married, would he attend the wedding?

Gay "GOTCHA!!" questions. Expect them every day, week, and month leading up to the election.

Follow up question from the gay-media:

"Are you still beating your wife?"

Liberator  posted on  2015-04-16   13:50:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Fred Mertz (#15)

yes, all three of his wives are wimmins.

Whew, that's god to hear.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   17:15:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: sneakypete (#20) (Edited)

I would not attend a sodomite wedding.

Let me correct that: I would not attend a male sodomite husband marrying a male homosexual wife wedding. No sense in me going to a lesbian wedding, I don't attend weddings that I can't tell the bride from the groom.

But, I need not worry, after 20 years of doing ChristianPatriot.com, I doubt I would be invited. I'm not known for keeping my feelings to myself.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   17:20:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Liberator (#28)

Your points are better than Pete's.

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-16   17:21:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Fred Mertz (#9)

And a awful lot of those married guys in the closet seem to be really pissed they were "forced" to marry a woman.

It's almost like they are saying "I coulda had the man of my dreams if I had waited,and I'm pissed about it!" in the background.

Ahem ... To continue our previous thoughts.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2015-04-16   18:48:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Bisexual - Person who likes both men and boys or person who like both women and girls.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-04-16   18:52:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: sneakypete (#17) (Edited)

Does that mean you get to pick and choose who can have sex with

Nature already did that ala several billion years of selective evolution which resulted in HETEROsexual human procreation.

Hedonistic mutual masturbation isn't sex regardless of which body parts are used, and regardless of what the transhumanist/postgenderist progressive NewSpeak dictionary attempts to redefine it as.

VxH  posted on  2015-04-16   19:34:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Fred Mertz (#22)

Back in our younger days we used to talk about blow jobs (from wimmins), but I've been polite enough not to ask this of the ones he married.

I suggested he had once,and he came unhinged.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:10:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Liberator, Fred Mertz (#24)

Thanks for the MUCH needed gender clarification, Fred.

You DO know it is still considered to be sodomy and is still illegal in several states,right?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:12:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: TooConservative (#26)

Their lives, their choice.

I agree.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:14:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: sneakypete (#37)

We still have some dry counties in Kentucky.

Nobody drinks alcohol there.../sarc

They can't buy it there though. Dang Baptists!

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-04-16   20:15:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Liberator (#27)

To further address your question, you or any mutant or multi-gendered person can indeed legally have consensual sex with anyone else otherwise to my knowledge.

And it fries your fritters that you can't have them tossed in jail for it,doesn't it?

So what "right" are you implying is deprived?

Are you trying to deny that you and your cult want any sexual contact made illegal that isn't between to married heterosexual adults,and any that doesn't consist entirely of the missionary position?

I asked you once if you and your wife ever had oral sodomy,and I thought your head was going to explode. You didn't answer directly,but IIRC you said or implied it was none of my business. On this I agree with you. Or would,if you didn't want other people put in jail for doing the same thing.

Are you ready to come out here now and publically state that you have never had any sex other than missionary position sex with your wife? If you won't make that claim,what moral standing do you have to jump all over others for having morality similar to yours?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-04-16   20:20:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 87) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com