[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Sheriffs sue Colorado claiming state marijuana legalization is 'against the Constitution'
Source: USA Today
URL Source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/ ... orado-over-marijuana/24385401/
Published: Mar 5, 2015
Author: Trevor Hughes
Post Date: 2015-03-05 08:46:28 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 911
Comments: 9

DENVER — Sheriffs from Colorado and neighboring states Kansas and Nebraska say in a lawsuit to be filed Thursday that Colorado's marijuana law creates a "crisis of conscience" by pitting the state law against the Constitution and puts an economic burden on other states.

The lawsuit asks a federal court in Denver to strike down Colorado's Amendment 64 that legalized the sale of recreational marijuana and to close the state's more than 330 licensed marijuana stores.

Lead plaintiff, Larimer County, Colo., Sheriff Justin Smith, calls the case a "constitutional showdown." Each day, he says, he must decide whether to violate the Colorado Constitution or the U.S. Constitution. Colorado legalized recreational marijuana sales Jan. 1, 2014, but marijuana remains illegal at the federal level.

Colorado is "asking every peace officer to violate their oath," Smith said. "What we're being forced to do ... makes me ineligible for office. Which constitution are we supposed to uphold?"

The out-of-state sheriffs say the flow of Colorado's legal marijuana across the border has increased drug arrests, overburdened police and courts and cost them money in overtime.

Felony drug arrests in the town of Chappell in Deuel County, Neb., 7 miles north of the Colorado border, jumped 400% over three years, a USA TODAY report tracking the flow of marijuana from Colorado into small towns across Nebraska found. Deuel County Sheriff Adam Hayward is one of the plaintiffs.

Police officers monitoring the flow of marijuana outside Colorado say volumes have risen annually. The Colorado-based Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area task force is still compiling 2014 numbers but expects to see the trend continue, director Tom Gorman said. He said non-residents often strike backdoor deals with legal growers to buy more than they are allowed, then illegally drive, fly or mail the marijuana across state lines.

The lawsuit invokes the federal government's right to regulate drugs and interstate commerce and argues that Colorado's decision to legalize marijuana hurt communities on the other side of the state lines. Attorneys general of Nebraska and Oklahoma filed a similar lawsuit late last year.

Colorado has not responded to the suit from the attorneys general, and Gov. John Hickenlooper, the defendant in the sheriffs' lawsuit, has not been served. Hickenlooper has said he respects the will of Colorado's voters. He has sought guidance from the federal government.

The Justice Department said it would largely take a hands-off approach in states that have legalized marijuana as long as regulations seek to keep the drugs away from children and criminals. Smith, the sheriff from Larimer, said that guidance amounts to instructing people "how to violate federal law but not get prosecuted."

Supporters of legalization criticize such lawsuits as last-ditch attempts by conservative politicians to derail states' movement toward marijuana legalization.

Speaking about the Nebraska-Oklahoma lawsuit in December, Mason Tvert of the Marijuana Policy Project said police should focus their attention on serious crimes and leave alone people who choose to use marijuana.

"These guys are on the wrong side of history," Tvert said.

****

These idiot sheriffs don't seem to understand their role in law enforcement - they are not tasked with enforcing federal law, their job is to enforce STATE law.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

Each day, he says, he must decide whether to violate the Colorado Constitution or the U.S. Constitution. Colorado legalized recreational marijuana sales Jan. 1, 2014, but marijuana remains illegal at the federal level.

I heard about this 15 minutes ago.

I'm thinking that the Court may resort to a lack-of-standing for this. I think you'd have a better chance along these lines if it was DEA or FBI agents filing suit that they are forced to non-enforce in Colorado in various ways or that local law enforcement agencies are not cooperative with them on grounds of the equal enforcement of federal laws. The doctrines of equal enforcement have become increasingly moot in the age of Obama's lawless edicts but this still would have some merit as a legal argument to the Court.

So I'm not confident that county law enforcement is going to be granted standing. Especially with Obama so evidently already refusing to try to enforce federal pot laws in these hippie states.

The public in CO still polls strong in support of legalization. So some of these sheriffs could get knocked off the lawsuit in 2016 elections over this issue.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-03-05   8:57:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

"Police officers monitoring the flow of marijuana outside Colorado say volumes have risen annually."

But ... but ... it's only legal in Colorado. It can't cross the state border.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-03-05   9:02:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#1)

"I'm thinking that the Court may resort to a lack-of-standing for this."

What if Colorado refused to enforce EPA regulations on river pollution and states downstream complained that their water pollution increased and it put an economic burden on them to clean it up?

Those states certainly have standing ... and a legitimate complaint with federal courts.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-03-05   9:14:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3)

What if Colorado refused to enforce EPA regulations on river pollution and states downstream complained that their water pollution increased and it put an economic burden on them to clean it up?

But they haven't. And the feds still enforce EPA laws in all states.

That is the kind of hypothetical that may sound good at first thought but the Court dismisses such reasoning out of hand. They go much more for direct legal reasoning that is on point and with existing precedents.

Of course, the Court may punt by saying the issue is not "ripe" for final disposition by the Court. They pulled that same stall tactic with the ObamaCare challenges to the courts until they had at least a half-dozen different court cases they could more or less consolidate into their final decision. They just punted until they thought it was time to issue a final verdict on the entire matter.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-03-05   9:29:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: TooConservative (#4)

"But they haven't. And the feds still enforce EPA laws in all states."

No they haven't. If you're insisting on stare decisis, I doubt anyone can find a precedent to match the lawlessness of this President.

My "polluted river" was not a legal argument -- more of an analogy to illustrate standing. Which I believe other states have.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-03-05   9:58:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deckard (#0)

These idiot sheriffs don't seem to understand their role in law enforcement - they are not tasked with enforcing federal law, their job is to enforce STATE law.

And just because Federal law makes simple possession of less than one ounce of pot a criminal offense does not mean the State must adopt a law making it a State criminal offense.

If the Feds want to chase after pot smokers, they can catch them and prosecute them in Federal court.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-03-05   13:07:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Deckard (#0)

Ted Cruz disagrees with the sheriffs. Here's a vid from CPAC showing Cruz and Hannity joking around about Colorado supplying the brownies. It starts at about 2:46 =>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prbn-ycOONM

Here are Cruz's serious comments following the jocularity =>

“I actually think this is great embodiment of what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis called ‘the laboratories of democracy,'” Cruz said. “If the citizens of Colorado decide they want to go down that road, that’s their prerogative. I don’t agree with it, but that’s their right."

___________________________________________________________________________

When you've lost Cruz...

kenh  posted on  2015-03-05   13:17:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Deckard (#0)

State attorneys have argued that Colorado's more permissive marijuana laws — both for medical and recreational use and sales — do not amount to legalization of marijuana. Instead, they contend that marijuana remains illegal in Colorado, aside from the specific exemptions allowed under the medical and recreational marijuana laws.

Doncha just "love" the twists, turns and especially the bends...

Gatlin  posted on  2015-03-05   13:57:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Y'ALL (#0)

The lawsuit invokes the federal government's right to regulate drugs and interstate commerce and argues that Colorado's decision to legalize marijuana hurt communities on the other side of the state lines.

It's about time that the SCOTUS opines that the federal government does NOT have the right to regulate drugs and such supposedly 'dangerous' types of interstate commerce. (As per booze and guns)

The court should declare that Colorado's decision to legalize marijuana does NOT hurt communities on the other side of the state lines, --- nowhere as seriously as the prohibitionary "war on drugs" has on individual constitutional rights, -- throughout the USA...

tpaine  posted on  2015-03-06   21:51:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com