[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: A GUIDE TO 2016 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES’ POSITIONS ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... itions-on-illegal-immigration/
Published: Jan 25, 2015
Author: BEN SHAPIRO
Post Date: 2015-01-25 15:18:21 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 10226
Comments: 41

With Republicans in Congress split over the best approach to President Obama’s executive amnesty – and with many establishment Republicans splitting from grassroots Republicans on the issue of illegal immigration more generally – it’s clear that immigration will be a hot-button primary issue in 2016.

That’s nothing new: Governor Rick Perry of Texas saw his campaign flounder not on his “oops” moment, but on his proclamation that those who didn’t back in-state tuition for illegal immigrants were heartless. But the base’s passion on the immigration issue has only escalated thanks to President Obama’s precipitous and illegal actions in failing to enforce American border law.

So where do the potential candidates stand? Here’s a rundown:

Jeb Bush. While Clint Bolick, a longtime Bush ally and Bush’s co-author of Immigration Wars, writes in the Wall Street Journal that Bush is “passionately pro-rule of law” with regard to illegal immigration, he’s fibbing. Here’s Bolick in the Journal just two weeks ago:

He would greatly strengthen border security, linking any legalized status for illegal immigrants to tangible progress on objective border security metrics… Mr. Bush does believe that children who were brought here illegally and some adults should be eligible for legalized status once certain conditions are met.

That is not closing the border before dealing with illegal immigrants who are here already. Nor is it a case-by-case assessment of whether it is appropriate for individuals to gain American citizenship, rather than a group-based assessment. Bush backed the 2013 Gang of Eight immigration bill opposed by most conservatives. After Obama’s executive amnesty, he said Congress should pass comprehensive immigration reform to stop Obama. He knows that his position is controversial with the base, and he revels in it – he uses that position to push himself as the moderate alternative for the benefit of the media.

Mitt Romney. Romney’s positions have shifted over time on this issue just as they have on many others. In 2012, Romney called for “self-deportation,” suggesting that if immigration law were enforced, many illegal immigrants would be unable to find jobs and would then go back to their home countries. By November 2013, he’d changed his tune. He said he was “absolutely convinced” Republicans had to push forward some sort of comprehensive immigration reform, adding:

I do believe that those who come here illegally ought to have an opportunity to get in line with everybody else. I don’t think those who come here illegally should jump to the front of the line or be given a special deal, be rewarded for coming here illegally, but I think they should have a chance, just like anybody else, to get in line and to become a citizen if they would like to do so.

Stick around. If you don’t like his position today, you might like it better tomorrow.

Chris Christie. The New Jersey governor has been vague on his illegal immigration position. The National Journal has an excellent timeline of the supposedly plainspoken governor’s positions here. To sample but a few, in 2009, he said he opposed in-state tuition for illegal immigrants and slammed Rick Perry for taking the opposite position in 2012. Then, in December 2013, he signed a bill allowing in-state tuition for illegal immigrants. He has been sidestepping questions ever since.

Ted Cruz. The Texas senator has been outspoken in his belief that the border must be enforced and that illegal immigrants should not be given a pathway to citizenship. Last year, he was instrumental in killing a Republican bill pushing comprehensive immigration reform. Cruz cites his father’s experience in immigrating to the country to bolster his position. “In my opinion, if we allow those who are here illegally to be put on a path to citizenship, that is incredibly unfair to those who follow the rules,” he said in 2013.

Rand Paul. The Senator from Kentucky has supported comprehensive immigration reform, even making joint calls with Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform in 2013 on behalf of the Republican bill. In 2013, the media widely misquoted him as stating he supported a pathway to citizenship, which he does not; Paul said at the time, according to his staff, that he supported “a quicker path to normalization, not citizenship, and being able to stay, work and pay taxes legally.” Paul himself explained:

Basically what I want to do is to expand the worker visa program, have border security and then as far as how people become citizens, there already is a process for how people become citizens. The main difference is I wouldn’t have people be forced to go home. You’d just get in line. But you get in the same line everyone is in.”

Mike Huckabee. The former Arkansas governor backed President Bush’s 2006 comprehensive immigration reform plan, stating:

I tend to think that the rational approach is to find a way to give people a pathway to citizenship. You shouldn’t ignore the law or ignore those who break it. But by the same token, I think it’s a little disingenuous when I hear people say they should experience the full weight of the law in every respect with no pathway, because that’s not something we practice in any other area of criminal justice in this country…. To think that we’re going to go lock up 12 million people, or even round them up and drive them to the border and let them go, might make a great political speech, but it’s not going to happen.

He also defended President Obama’s 2012 action deferring deportation for illegal immigrants between the ages of 16 and 30 – the so-called DREAMers. “You don’t punish a kid for what his or her parents did,” Huckabee said. ‘The content itself, the goal, is an admirable thing.” But a few months ago, he slammed President Obama, stating that Obama “doesn’t believe there should be borders.”

Scott Walker. Wisconsin’s governor may support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. In 2013, he told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that he “hasn’t taken a position on citizenship for illegal immigrants.” He told Politico, “For people waiting to come in our country legally, we’ve got to make sure that they get in first, that they get their status first, because they’ve been following the rules and playing by the rules. After that, if there is a way to set up a process so that you enable people to come in and have a legal pathway to do that, that’s something we’ve got to embrace. Whether or not it’s that specific bill or not, I think there’s some nuances to that.”

Ben Carson. Carson endorses a guest-worker program for non-citizens. He also said that the government should “of course allow [illegal immigrants] to have a pathway to citizenship. That’s the only humane and reasonable thing to do.”

Warning: you may want to purchase some Dramamine to prevent motion sickness as shifting positions dizzy you during the upcoming election campaign.


Poster Comment:

Only Ted Cruz passes this litmus test.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

Only Ted Cruz passes this litmus test.

Are you "single-issue voter?!?

Single-issue politics are a form of litmus test; common examples are abortion, taxation, animal rights, environment, and gun politics. The National Rifle Association in the United States, which has only one specific interest, is an example of a single-issue group. What differentiates single-issue groups from other interest groups is their intense style of lobbying.

The term single-issue voter has been used to describe people who may make voting decisions based on the candidates' stance on a single issue (e.g. "pro- life" or "pro-choice", support for gun rights or gun-control). The existence of single-issue voters can give a distorted impression: a candidate's overall views may not enjoy the same support. For example, a person who votes for a socially conservative Republican candidate, based solely on his or her support of gun rights, may not necessarily share the candidate's other views on social issues, such as abortion or family values.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-issue_politics

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   15:29:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Gatlin (#1)

Are you "single-issue voter?!?

No a lot of issues are important. But when a candidite is willing to destroy the country or murder kids or take my guns away, or give the UN authority over us then they are crossed off my list.

So obviously you are ok with the the illegals coming here and breeding. How many other issues are you a sell out on?

Can they kill kids too and you would still consider them? I wouldn't.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-25   15:32:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)

So obviously you are ok with the the illegals coming here and breeding.

Nope, I am not fine with that....I am not a libertarian.

We need to CLOSE the borders....I have always been for that.

I am just asking if you are a single issue voter....and you said that you were not.

Thanks for responding.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   15:36:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone (#2)

How many other issues are you a sell out on?

What issue have I sold out on?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   15:37:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Gatlin (#3)

I am just asking if you are a single issue voter....and you said that you were not.

There are a few single issues that will cause me to never consider a person.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-25   15:38:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A K A Stone (#2)

Can they kill kids too and you would still consider them? I wouldn't.

I wouldn't either....thanks for letting me get an answer in between your assumptions.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   15:38:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Gatlin (#4)

What issue have I sold out on?

never mind for now.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-25   15:39:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: A K A Stone (#5)

We all will have our choice, I am still forming mine.

I will support and contribute to the Republican nominee whomever he is....in order to defeat Hillary. Will you?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   15:40:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#2) (Edited)

The borders need closed and our current system of immigration enforced.

The bigger picture is simple. If we get too big of non AMERICAN mob in this country, it could have damaging effects on a polical system that has too much mob rule designed into it.

Before you know it, in 20 years we can change the constitution to allow a Mexican born citizen to be prez.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-01-25   15:40:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: A K A Stone (#7)

What issue have I sold out on?

never mind for now.

I know....none.

That was just a "throw away" accusation.

I understand.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   15:41:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Gatlin (#8)

I will support and contribute to the Republican nominee whomever he is....in order to defeat Hillary. Will you?

Certainly not. No way I would vote for Bush. Zero chance. Zero chance on others too.

If it's Bush, since he is just Hillary I will vote 3rd party.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-25   15:54:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Gatlin (#10)

I know....none.

That was just a "throw away" accusation.

I understand.

No you appeared to be sticking up for losers.

So for instance if you would send money to elect another Bush. That in my view would be a sell out.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-25   15:55:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Gatlin, A K A Stone, D 'n R Party of Satan, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#8) (Edited)

I will support and contribute to the Republican nominee whomever he is....

Typical Satan supporting mainstream Republican or Democrat zombie. Anything with their favorite letter, D or R.

Pathetic! That's why this country is doomed.


The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Hondo68  posted on  2015-01-25   16:00:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Gatlin, hondo68, Stoner, A K A Stone, CZ82, tpaine, sneakypete, TEA Party Reveler, Dead Culture Watch, Pridie.Nones, Willie Green, Excalibur, Operation 40, (#8)

I will support and contribute to the Republican nominee whomever he is....in order to defeat Hillary.

Alternate text if image doesn't load

Will you?

No.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts

Deckard  posted on  2015-01-25   16:14:30 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Only Ted Cruz passes this litmus test.

According to this assessment at least. You'll note all the "Top Dogs" are obvious GOPe mutts beholden to globalist policies anathema to our national interests.

I'm still unable to undertstand why the illegal invasion cannot be quelled immediately, as well as enforcement of stringent border control. (More thanks to the frauds, Dubya Bush and his faux "adults-in-charge.")

Moreover, to those who say deporting illegal invaders is "impossible" by some kind of legal registration or mechanism is...A LIAR. Promoting suicidal, political correct immigration policies over constitutional obligations and responsibilities is...a clear dereliction of duty.

Any politician or Presidential candidate who fails to remind the American people that such a position is...a political whore, beholden to his/her sock-puppet sponsors; disloyal, feckless, and unworthy of leading this nation.

Liberator  posted on  2015-01-25   16:15:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: A K A Stone (#2)

Are you "single-issue voter?!?

No a lot of issues are important. But when a candidite is willing to destroy the country or murder kids or take my guns away, or give the UN authority over us then they are crossed off my list.

That is not really a single issue anyway. The electorate that is imported by illegal immigration votes overwhelmingly Democrat, and hence they vote for abortion, gun control and globalism. Supporting amnesty is supporting abortion and gun control.

nativist nationalist  posted on  2015-01-25   16:21:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: A K A Stone (#12)

You [Gilligan] appeared to be sticking up for losers....If you would send money to elect another Bush. That in my view would be a sell out.

The gold standard for chirping Losers of a Feather IS selling out. After all, his check is in the mail.

Their ilk are much like the loyalists to the crown of King George. During the American Revolution, they'd have sold out George Washington and ratted out Nathaniel Green.

Liberator  posted on  2015-01-25   16:24:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: nativist nationalist (#16)

The electorate that is imported by illegal immigration votes overwhelmingly Democrat, and hence they vote for abortion, gun control and globalism. Supporting amnesty is supporting abortion and gun control.

Spot on.

Liberator  posted on  2015-01-25   16:25:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: hondo68 (#13)

" Typical Satan supporting mainstream Republican or Democrat zombie. Anything with their favorite letter, D or R.

Pathetic! That's why this country is doomed. "

Yes it is. I sadly reached that conclusion a long time ago!!

If Jesus Christ himself was running against Satan, many would vote for Satan if he was part of their party.

That is a sad thing to say, but it is very true.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   17:36:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Deckard (#14)

Good post

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   17:38:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: hondo68 (#13)

" Typical Satan supporting mainstream Republican or Democrat zombie. Anything with their favorite letter, D or R. "

BTW, the Establishment considers them "useful idiots" and knows they can count on them. They are useful idiots, and are not smart enough to figure it out!!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   17:43:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: A K A Stone (#11)

If it's Bush, since he is just Hillary I will vote 3rd party.

I have no problem with you doing that....Ain't America GRAND?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   17:50:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Deckard (#14)

" I will support and contribute to the Republican nominee whomever he is....in order to defeat Hillary. "

I bet that would not stand if the GOP nominee was someone like Ron Paul!

I know that will never happen (Paul getting the nomination), but I am sure in some cases that would be an empty promise!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   17:54:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: A K A Stone (#12) (Edited)

No you appeared to be sticking up for losers.

"Stop judging by mere appearances, but instead judge correctly." John 7:24 New International Version.

I never judge others based on "appearances," I will judge them on their actions

Ted Cruz is my number one choice at this time. If however Bush is the Republican nominee, I will send money for him to beat Hillary.

What will I have "sold out" by doing that?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   18:13:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Stoner, Deckard (#23)

I bet that would not stand if the GOP nominee was someone like Ron Paul!

Well, Stoney....you would lose that bet.

I said I will vote for the Republican nominee to beat Hillary.

What was it that you did not understand about that?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   18:17:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Stoner, Deckard (#20)

Good post

Why? Nothing presented in that cartoon can be considered either true or false. What in those analogies comes in any degree near identifying one politician to another politician? The whole cartoon shows extreme dissimilarity and therefore is pointless. But then, everything Deckard posts usually is.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   18:24:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Gatlin (#25)

" Well, Stoney....you would lose that bet. "

Well gatty, I do not believe you would support a Ron Paul, not in a million years!

Therefore I think it would be a safe bet.

Have a nice day.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   18:24:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Stoner (#27) (Edited)

Yes, Sir....You can believe whatever you want to.

Ain't America GRAND...

I always have a WONDERFUL day!

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-25   18:28:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Stoner, Deckard, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#25)

Let's review Gatlin's voting record...

1) A vote for McCain 2008 = A vote for Obama

2) A vote for Romney 2012 = A vote for Obama

Gatlin's plan for 2016 = I will vote for the Republican nominee [likely Jeb the loser] to beat Hillary (or whomever).

CONCLUSION: Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results.

The only way horrid candidates like Obama and Hillary can win, is for the Republicans to run bottom of the barrel crud despised by a sizable percentage of Americans. Both wings of the D&R party will do anything to prevent a pro-American patriot from being elected president.


The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Hondo68  posted on  2015-01-25   18:59:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Gatlin (#28)

" You can believe whatever you want to. "

I usually do.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   20:04:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: hondo68 (#29)

" Both wings of the D&R party will do anything to prevent a pro-American patriot from being elected president. "

Sadly, this is true.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   20:05:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: hondo68 (#29)

hondo68, you might want to ping gatlin to your post # 29, to be entirely fair. Besides, it might prove to be rather humorous to see how he retorts! LOL !

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-25   20:18:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Stoner (#32)

hondo68, you might want to ping gatlin to your post #

He has me bozed, so I don't bother to ping the pinhead. You could quote me and ping him. He'll see that! Unless the coward bozos you too.


The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Hondo68  posted on  2015-01-25   20:42:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Liberator (#15)

I'm still unable to undertstand why the illegal invasion cannot be quelled immediately, as well as enforcement of stringent border control.

It can be done, Eisenhower did it. It's not a question of ability, but desire.

nativist nationalist  posted on  2015-01-25   20:49:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Gatlin (#8)

I will support and contribute to the Republican nominee whomever he is....in order to defeat Hillary. Will you?

No.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-01-25   21:16:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: nativist nationalist (#34)

" I'm still unable to undertstand why the illegal invasion cannot be quelled immediately, as well as enforcement of stringent border control.

It can be done, Eisenhower did it. It's not a question of ability, but desire. "

Yup, the politico's lack the will. And unfortunately, the voters lack the brains to vote them out!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-26   9:10:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: gatlin (#29)

Sorry, Hondo asked me to ping you to this post, just about forgot.

On 2015-01-25 18:59:47, hondo68 wrote:

To: Stoner, Deckard, *The Two Parties ARE the Same*

Let's review Gatlin's voting record...

1) A vote for McCain 2008 = A vote for Obama

2) A vote for Romney 2012 = A vote for Obama

Gatlin's plan for 2016 = I will vote for the Republican nominee [likely Jeb the loser] to beat Hillary (or whomever).

CONCLUSION: Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results.

The only way horrid candidates like Obama and Hillary can win, is for the Republicans to run bottom of the barrel crud despised by a sizable percentage of Americans. Both wings of the D&R party will do anything to prevent a pro-American patriot from being elected president.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-01-26   9:16:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: hondo68 (#29)

Here if you want another one of his quotes.

libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...? ArtNum=37123&Disp=54#C54

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-01-26   9:43:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: A K A Stone (#7)

Too bad the old posting history at LP isn't accessible, you'd have a field day there. LOL.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-01-26   9:51:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Deckard (#14)

Nice image, that tells a lot about the mindset of Leftards and Moderates!

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-01-26   9:52:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 41) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com