[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST
See other BANNED AT LIBERTYPOST Articles

Goldi banned censored delete elpee

Title: NO WARNINGS FOR ILLEGAL ACTIVITY. You're gone: tpane banned at eLPee by sysadmin, Gatlin, Palmdale, community agitators
Source: eLPee
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=349958&Disp=12#C12
Published: Jan 6, 2015
Author: sysadmin
Post Date: 2015-01-06 22:46:59 by Hondo68
Keywords: community agitators, palmdale, tater, gatlin
Views: 61809
Comments: 94

#6. To: sysadmin (#5) (Edited)

URL Source: [None]
Post Date: 2015-01-05 22:01:50 by tpaine

L.A. Times v. Free Republic

Source: The Washington Post.

I can see it now: The Washington Post v. Liberty Post courtesy of tpaine.

How much did the lawsuit cost Free Republic?

Sys Admin - I suggest you remove the article and include tpaine in your ping since he posted it. Goldi Has repeatedly stated NOTHING is to be posted from The Washington Post as per the letter TWP sent to her and tpaine KNOWS this. I suspect that is why he intentionally left the source blank.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/01/05/uncivil- obedience/

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-06   20:27:00 ET  Reply   Trace  


#7. To: sysadmin (#5)

FYI

www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts

Palmdale  posted on  2015-01-06   20:33:42 ET  Reply   Trace  


#8. To: Gatlin (#6)

Goldi Has repeatedly stated NOTHING is to be posted from The Washington Post as per the letter TWP sent to her and tpaine know this. I suspect that is why he intentionally left the source blank.

Not good.

Palmdale  posted on  2015-01-06   20:35:13 ET  Reply   Trace  


#9. To: Palmdale (#8)

Goldi Has repeatedly stated NOTHING is to be posted from The Washington Post as per the letter TWP sent to her and tpaine know this. I suspect that is why he intentionally left the source blank.

Not good.

Not good at all!!!

Gatlin  posted on  2015-01-06   20:38:20 ET  Reply   Trace  


#10. To: Gatlin, Palmdale, tpaine (#9)

Are you guys saying that tpaine deliberately posted copyrighted material and attempted to hide that it was coming from such a source? That is a serious charge.

Tpaine, I'm giving you the opportunity to explain whether or not this is the case. In the meantime I am going to redact the original article until the truth of this can be determined.


#12. To: tpaine (#11)

I'd say we should wait and see if the washpost sends us another infringement notice. -- I'd bet that since we no longer have an 'owner' (subject to finding Goldies will), that they simply won't bother, and so will no one else.

Yes, I now "own" the virtual server LP is running on as I am the one one paying the bill. Very soon LP will be running on my own server. I am the one who will be held responsible for any violations.

I'm very sorry, but I will not tolerate illegal actions of any kind here. NO WARNINGS FOR ILLEGAL ACTIVITY. You're gone.

Since the offending material has been removed I will leave this thread here as a warning. I'll leave it open for now but may lock it after hearing what the community has to say.

sysadmin  posted on  2015-01-06   20:53:31 ET  Reply   Trace  


Poster Comment:

Shot down by nanny state community organizers, tater and palmjob.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-51) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#52. To: nolu chan (#51)

We're saying pretty much the same thing. You just attach more importance to it.

LP (software and database) are contained in a virtual machine which can be easily moved from server to server. It is being adapted to run on sysadmin's personal server at present.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-01-10   8:59:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: nolu chan (#43)

We still had a lot more American made stuff when Reagan was President. His polilcies put us on good ground for the future.

Clinton is a free traitor and a traitor. That has hurt the economy.

Clinton is largely responsible for the stock market crash with his elimination of Glass–Steagall.

The things the President does doesn't always bear fruit good or rotten on their term.

What exactly did Clinton to to make the economy better? Nothing that I can think of.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-10   10:37:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Nexus6. nolu chan (#45)

For multiplication of the Federal debt of all those who preceded him, Reagan exceeded the accomplishments of Obama.

Not really. That belongs to LBJ and FDR. They gave us socialist/communist security and the Awful Society legislation. That is what most of the growth in government comes from.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-10   10:41:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: nolu chan (#41)

In my view, the next logical successor would not be an anonymous sysadmin. It could be that person with his or her LP handle revealed so the members would know who is being put in charge. If his/her posting history is unobjectionable, his/her handle should not be a problem.

Members have no legal right to know the true identity of SysAdmin. Therefore, assuming control of the site does not obligate SysAdmin to disclose his own personal information.

This argument lacks merit. Who paid is not important. Who held the title when Goldi died is important. If you pay for a car and place the title in my name, you have no claim to the car should I die. It would be part of my estate. If the domain name or the site has value, it belongs to the estate.

Well, the key here is the domain name and data have a pretty much zero value, which will be evidenced by the fact that no claim will be made on it.

SysAdmin has defacto and IMO, moral right to run the site.

Actually, Sysadmin has no authority. Any authority he had as Goldi's agent died with Goldi and his knowledge of her death.

That's why I say it's now de facto his site. He has control of both the domain and the DB. Any laws saying otherwise mean nothing unless and until something is acted upon through those laws. Absent such actions, he has full power over the site. And unchallenged power = de facto authority. That is how it works when one country invades another, after all, and for the same reasons.

Nolu, one thing I have gained an appreciation for living in Ecuador is just how limited laws are. Laws are not some kind of magical, inescapable, edicts of God that intertwine with the fabric of the universe. They are merely tools which affected people either seek to use to further their own causes, or obstacles which people seek to overcome in furthering their own cause. Laws are limited by the degree to which they are enforced, and have no power beyond that point. This is true in every country, including the USA.

Ergo, no matter what laws exist, such as those you cited, that might imply that LP is part of Goldi's estate, if no action is taken on such laws then the laws are of no significance whatsoever. That's the reality, and reality trumps law.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-10   11:58:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Pinguinite (#55)

Nolu, one thing I have gained an appreciation for living in Ecuador

Escaping the authorities who were on to your your shenanigans in the US?

Laws are not some kind of magical, inescapable, edicts of God that intertwine with the fabric of the universe. They are merely tools which affected people either seek to use to further their own causes, or obstacles which people seek to overcome in furthering their own cause. Laws are limited by the degree to which they are enforced, and have no power beyond that point. This is true in every country, including the USA.

I actually agree with this. The US was enforcing the law you flaunted, so you ran to Ecuador. What happens when Ecuador makes you pay taxes?

Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president

no gnu taxes  posted on  2015-01-10   12:19:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Pinguinite, nolu chan, Y'ALL (#55)

nolu chan (#41) ---- And In my view, the next logical successor would not be an anonymous sysadmin. It could be that person with his or her LP handle revealed so the members would know who is being put in charge. If his/her posting history is unobjectionable, his/her handle should not be a problem.

Pinguinite--- Members have no legal right to know the true identity of SysAdmin. Therefore, assuming control of the site does not obligate SysAdmin to disclose his own personal information.

Pinguinite, technically, I'd suppose you're right. But I doubt a group of your peers would agree. -- And the consent of our peers is a big part of what our law is based upon.

Can you agree with that?

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-10   16:04:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: tpaine, nolu chan, Pinguinite (#57)

In the FWIW category, I'd say that sysadmin doesn't have to be public but has to be available for a DMCA takedown notice. It's one of the things attached to domain names and keeping accurate records for your registrar, even if you stealth your DNS registration through Panama to hide the site's owners' info from the public.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-01-10   18:08:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: TooConservative (#58)

In the FWIW category, I'd say that sysadmin doesn't have to be public but has to be available for a DMCA takedown notice. It's one of the things attached to domain names and keeping accurate records for your registrar, even if you stealth your DNS registration through Panama to hide the site's owners' info from the public.

Thanks for your comment, and in my opinion it's part of the reason that you should take over LP.

Its pretty obvious that my offer to do so will fail, and I think you should make one, as I don't think the present sysadmin can keep the site together.

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-10   18:22:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Pinguinite, tpaine (#55)

In my view, the next logical successor would not be an anonymous sysadmin. It could be that person with his or her LP handle revealed so the members would know who is being put in charge. If his/her posting history is unobjectionable, his/her handle should not be a problem.

Members have no legal right to know the true identity of SysAdmin. Therefore, assuming control of the site does not obligate SysAdmin to disclose his own personal information.

Ok, let me clarify. If he wanted people to vote for him, he should have sought those votes using his known handle and not as the anonymous Sysadmin.

People making a choice should have the opportunity to make an informed choice.

Your milage may vary, but would other candidates be permitted to seek votes as the anonymous Candidate #1, Candidate #2, etc.

Moreover, the true identity of Sysadmin is not his LP handle. That only allows people to see what he has posted under his anonymous handle, unless he used his real name as his handle.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-01-10   18:33:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: A K A Stone (#53)

What exactly did Clinton to to make the economy better? Nothing that I can think of.

Clinton did not pile up a mountain of debt. For all the good things Reagan did, he exploded the deficit and the debt. Doing so under Reagan deserves the same criticism as doing it under Bush I, Bush II, or Obama.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-01-10   18:43:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: tpaine, Too Conservative (#59)

Its pretty obvious that my offer to do so will fail, and I think you should make one, as I don't think the present sysadmin can keep the site together.

I concur.

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-01-10   18:45:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: TooConservative, tpaine, Pinguinite (#58)

In the FWIW category, I'd say that sysadmin doesn't have to be public but has to be available for a DMCA takedown notice. It's one of the things attached to domain names and keeping accurate records for your registrar, even if you stealth your DNS registration through Panama to hide the site's owners' info from the public.

People making a choice should have the opportunity to make an informed choice.

Your milage may vary, but would other candidates be permitted to seek votes as the anonymous Candidate #1, Candidate #2, etc.

Moreover, the true identity of Sysadmin is not his LP handle. That only allows people to see what he has posted under his anonymous handle, unless he used his real name as his handle. Goldi-Lox was not the true identity of the previous owner.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-01-10   18:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: nolu chan (#63)

Moreover, the true identity of Sysadmin is not his LP handle. That only allows people to see what he has posted under his anonymous handle, unless he used his real name as his handle. Goldi-Lox was not the true identity of the previous owner.

I know you're making a point but it escapes me. It seems you're stating the obvious. Probably I'm reading poorly as I don't see how that relates directly to our earlier topic.

I'm just saying that sysadmin can be anonymous but the website has to have official contact info to receive takedown notices if necessary. Some ISPs will terminate you for not keeping your info up to date as a result of bad experiences with this.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-01-10   19:05:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: tpaine (#59)

Its pretty obvious that my offer to do so will fail, and I think you should make one, as I don't think the present sysadmin can keep the site together.

I think you're winning the vote pretty easily. Too late to avoid it now.     : )

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-01-10   19:07:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: TooConservative, Pinguinite (#64)

[#55 Pinguinite] Members have no legal right to know the true identity of SysAdmin.

[#58 TooConservative] In the FWIW category, I'd say that sysadmin doesn't have to be public but has to be available for a DMCA takedown notice.

[#60 nc] Ok, let me clarify. If he wanted people to vote for him, he should have sought those votes using his known handle and not as the anonymous Sysadmin. People making a choice should have the opportunity to make an informed choice.

[#63 nc] People making a choice should have the opportunity to make an informed choice. Your milage may vary, but would other candidates be permitted to seek votes as the anonymous Candidate #1, Candidate #2, etc. Moreover, the true identity of Sysadmin is not his LP handle.

[#64 nc] I know you're making a point but it escapes me. It seems you're stating the obvious. Probably I'm reading poorly as I don't see how that relates directly to our earlier topic. I'm just saying that sysadmin can be anonymous but the website has to have official contact info to receive takedown notices if necessary.

The official notice for takedown notices can list Sysadmin with contact information. Its purpose is to facilitate contact with an authorized and legally responsible person.

I am speaking to having a vote and not knowing who you are voting for. Pinguinite's objection is that no one has a right to know the true identity of SysAdmin. I agree, but the voting members of LP have an apparent interest in knowing the handle by which all the candidates are known.

It just sounds too much like Obamacare. You have to elect him to find out who he is and what he will do. And only a single candidate has the option to suppress knowledge of his handle. I do not think asking to know who you are voting for is asking too much. I am not referring to a true real world identity, but to the handle by which the site members have come to know sysadmin and his expressed opinions.

I am just clarifying that the reference to true identity is obscuring and inapplicable. Nobody has mentioned or cares what his true identity is.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-01-10   20:15:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: nolu chan (#66)

Nobody has mentioned or cares what his true identity is.

That's Clown Posse territory.

I don't give a whit.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-10   20:25:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: nolu chan (#66)

[#60 nc] Ok, let me clarify. If he wanted people to vote for him, he should have sought those votes using his known handle and not as the anonymous Sysadmin. People making a choice should have the opportunity to make an informed choice.

LP has had a sysadmin account for years. I'm not sure it has been held by the same guy all that time. Even in 2003, you can see sysadmin posting system-type messages to Neil or posts to Goldi about outages.

So this current sysadmin may only be the latest in a series for all we know.

At any rate, sysadmin only ever posted info about the server, downtime, upgrades, etc.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-01-10   20:59:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: TooConservative (#68)

sysadmin has a secret Adolf Hitler side we haven't seen until now.

Why do you even have to ask Pericles if he was Destro and Godwinson? I don't think it matters at all, but it might to some.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-10   21:04:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: TooConservative (#68)

[#60 nc] Ok, let me clarify. If he wanted people to vote for him, he should have sought those votes using his known handle and not as the anonymous Sysadmin. People making a choice should have the opportunity to make an informed choice.

LP has had a sysadmin account for years. I'm not sure it has been held by the same guy all that time. Even in 2003, you can see sysadmin posting system-type messages to Neil or posts to Goldi about outages.

More diversion. Who gives a rat's ass about the number of people who may have been sysadmin and made some system status announcements as sysadmin. Nobody is interested in what has been posted by the sysadmin(s).

There just might be some interest about what Mystery Man did when posting on the discussion forum under his usual handle. Opinions about tpaine and Pericles are formed based on their forum activity. Opinions about Mystery Man are based on a vacuum of information.

There was no need to use the sysadmin anonymous ID to seek member approval to take over the site. Everyone knew Goldi was owner. Nobody ever gave a damn who was sysadmin. He could have sought the takeover under his normal handle. There would have been no need to link it to the sysadmin position.

Whoever it is could have used their common handle and then all those voting would have some knowledge of the person and be able to determine whether to give their informed consent.

It is interesting to observe the LPe maneuver to tender control of the site to an anonymous person and to defend said anonymity.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-01-11   0:46:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: tpaine (#57)

Pinguinite, technically, I'd suppose you're right. But I doubt a group of your peers would agree. -- And the consent of our peers is a big part of what our law is based upon.

Can you agree with that?

I'm not sure what you are getting at.

You want me to say I'm wrong because a lot of others disagree with something I believe?

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   4:53:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: nolu chan (#60)

Ok, let me clarify. If he wanted people to vote for him, he should have sought those votes using his known handle and not as the anonymous Sysadmin.

I think it's apparent he doesn't want people to vote for him. His vote on the thread is to shut LP down.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   4:55:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: TooConservative (#64)

I'm just saying that sysadmin can be anonymous but the website has to have official contact info to receive takedown notices if necessary. Some ISPs will terminate you for not keeping your info up to date as a result of bad experiences with this.

One can be both anonymous, and yet also have contact info avaylable to the public. Many domain name registration services offer this. If you want to contact an anonymous domain owner, you simply go through the registration service to do so.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   4:58:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Pinguinite (#72) (Edited)

I think it's apparent he doesn't want people to vote for him. His vote on the thread is to shut LP down.

I think it is equally apparent that all candidates for President really do not want that office. They only agree to run after much wringing of hands, praying to their Lord, consulting with the family about the great sacrifice, and reluctantly agreeing to run because it is their civic duty, and it is a time of crisis in which their country needs them. They do not want it but cannot just walk away from it, even if it involves great sacrifice.

It is amusing to see the many variations of defending an anonymous candidate and an UNinformed electorate.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-01-11   10:27:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Pinguinite (#72)

I think it's apparent he doesn't want people to vote for him. His vote on the thread is to shut LP down.

Enter Screen Names of recipients separated by commas or semicolons.

He is on the ballot 3 times. How could he not be interested.

If he gets the vote he can run it or shut it down. (Why would he even put himself on a "ballot" if he didn't want it?

If people vote to shut it down he can shut it down.

If there is no majority, he can shut it down or run it

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-11   10:40:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Pinguinite (#71)

Pinguinite, technically, I'd suppose you're right. But I doubt a group of your peers would agree. -- And the consent of our peers is a big part of what our law is based upon. Can you agree with that?

I'm not sure what you are getting at. --- You want me to say I'm wrong because a lot of others disagree with something I believe?

I think you know that one of the basics of law in the USA is the consent of the governed, (as in 75% of states must approve amendments) -- and you don't want to admit it.

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-11   10:45:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: A K A Stone (#75)

He is on the ballot 3 times. How could he not be interested.

If he gets the vote he can run it or shut it down. (Why would he even put himself on a "ballot" if he didn't want it?

If people vote to shut it down he can shut it down.

If there is no majority, he can shut it down or run it.

Well reasoned.

When I first saw the 'ballot', I felt a little relieved, as I knew I couldn't win.

The sysadmin set it up that way either inadvertently, or purposely. I'd bet on the latter, which is just fine with me.

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-11   10:56:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: A K A Stone (#75)

If there is no majority, he can shut it down or run it

Carnac the Magnificent says the site is not getting shut down.

If it were really to shut down and the domain name be released, anyone could purchase the domain name and start a brand new Liberty Post. It would be like starting Liberty's Flame but selecting a different domain name. Don't hold your breath waiting for the name to released.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-01-11   11:12:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: tpaine (#76)

I think you know that one of the basics of law in the USA is the consent of the governed, (as in 75% of states must approve amendments) -- and you don't want to admit it.

I still don't know what it is you think I don't want to admit.

Other than that, I agree with your statement.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   11:43:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: A K A Stone (#75)

He is on the ballot 3 times. How could he not be interested.

3 times?

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   11:44:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: nolu chan (#78)

If it were really to shut down and the domain name be released, anyone could purchase the domain name and start a brand new Liberty Post. It would be like starting Liberty's Flame but selecting a different domain name. Don't hold your breath waiting for the name to released.

Anyone can start an alternate/similar forum if they would like, regardless of the vote. They just would not have LP's past posting archives, which is not even needed.

I would not expect the name to be released in the event of a shutdown though. It may be retained as a memorial, and also to assist any relatives of Sally's in the event she is searched for at some point in the future. Someone could always register a similar name.

I think a shutdown is the cleanest solution.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   11:50:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Pinguinite (#80)

3 times?

Yes.

If you vote for him. If you vote for shutdown. Or if there is no clear winner. He wins.

I know it isn't any of my business really. But this is all everyone is talking about.

Maybe someday the forum will talk about news and not about libertypost.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-01-11   12:05:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: A K A Stone, Pinguinite, All (#82)

A K A Stone- He is on the ballot 3 times. How could he not be interested.

Pinguinite - 3 times?

******************

A K A Stone- Yes. If you vote for him. If you vote for shutdown. Or if there is no clear winner. He wins.

Interesting...I didn't catch that.

("Throw me to the wolves...and I will return leading the pack")

Murron  posted on  2015-01-11   12:30:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: A K A Stone (#82)

If you vote for him. If you vote for shutdown. Or if there is no clear winner. He wins.

If you see it that way, then he's on the ballot 5 times, because he also wins if it's handed off to someone else.

So he wins no matter what.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   12:45:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Pinguinite (#84)

There are 4 options, not 5.

I would sum options 1, 2 or 3 together as: folks who want elPee to continue vs. #4 close down elPee.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-11   12:52:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Fred Mertz (#85)

There are 4 options, not 5.

Stone says "no clear winner" is also a winning option for SysAdmin.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-01-11   13:18:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Pinguinite (#86) (Edited)

Why have an election with no winner?

Okay, I now see that as the 5th option. Thanks.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-01-11   13:23:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: A K A Stone (#82) (Edited)

Maybe someday the forum will talk about news and not about libertypost.

A K A Stone

The best news today is the Packers, kicking ass!!!

I spoke too soon. Dallas just scored.....

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-11   13:32:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: tpaine (#88)

The best news today is the Packers, kicking ass!!!

Really?

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-01-11   14:14:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: CZ82 (#89)

The best news today is the Packers, kicking ass!!!

Really?

The best news today was the Packers, kicking ass, in the first series.

I still have high hopes...

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-11   14:34:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: CZ82, Y'ALL, --- PACKERS WIN !! (#89)

To: CZ82 (#89)

The best news today is the Packers, kicking ass!!!

Really?

The best news today was the Packers, kicking ass, in the first series.

I still have high hopes...

And not to rub it in, -- They pulled it off!!!!!

tpaine  posted on  2015-01-11   16:18:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (92 - 94) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com