International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Terrorist Exchanged For Bowe Bergdahl Now Top ISIS Commander
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://nationalreport.net/terrorist ... rgdahl-now-top-isis-commander/
Published: Sep 18, 2014
Author: National Report
Post Date: 2014-09-18 07:20:50 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 7084
Comments: 26
Mullah Mohammed Fazi, one of the five Guantanamo Bay detainees released by the Obama administration in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl, has been confirmed to be currently in Iraq. Fazi, the Taliban’s former Defense Minister, is serving in a leadership capacity within the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS. Reports indicate that Fazi, classified by a 2008 Pentagon dossier as being considered a high risk to the United States if released, appears to be heavily engaged in the systematic murder of Iraqs non-Sunni population. Internal Pentagon assessments say the strategy of wholesale slaughter carried out in ISIS occupied territories very well could have originated with Fazi. Many of the same techniques were utilized by the Taliban in Afghanistan to consolidate and strengthen their position under Mohammed Fazi’s direction. News of Fazi’s involvement in the ISIS caliphate comes shortly on the heels of a finding by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office that President Obama broke the law when he exchanged five Taliban leaders for Sgt Bowe Bergdahl. The White House has “strongly disagreed” with the GAO’s conclusions. White House spokesman Eric Schultz has said that,”We reject the implication that the administration acted unlawfully.” The Obama administration is worried that news of Fazi’s emergence as a top commander in ISIS will worsen public perception of both the terrorist swap for Bergdahl and the GAO’s findings of illegal activity. The two events, taken together, could generate sufficient fallout to derail some of the political agenda President Obama has for the remainder of his “lame duck” term. The White House has gone into full damage control mode regarding both developments. Unofficial word coming out of the White House is that Fazi has been elevated to the top of a prioritized drone strike list of terrorist targets. It is being speculated that the administration believes that it can mitigate a large portion of the potential political fallout if Fazi, and the embarrassment he represents, is quickly eliminated. To facilitate this elimination large portions of regional drone resources are being specifically tasked with finding and destroying the former prisoner. Senator John McCain has stated that he believes the GAO’S findings, coupled with Fazi re-engaging in terrorist and genocidal activities, could be grounds for impeachment. “The GAO has clearly declared that President Obama broke the law”, said Senator McCain. “The prisoner that President Obama illegally ordered released has joined another group hostile to our country and has led our enemies in the murder, rape and torture of innocent men, women and children. I personally can’t imagine anything worse a sitting President could do. In my mind it rises to the level of an impeachable offense.” It remains to be seen whether the House leadership believes Obama’s illegal acts in the Bergdahl exchange meets the legal requirements necessary to impeach. For now Fazi remains free in Iraq, conducting operations under the ISIS banner, instead of in the American cell where he was.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
You know this isn't true, don't you?
I don't know if it is true or not. Do you have some special knowledge on the subject?
Special knowledge? No.... but I can execute a simple google search in seconds..... http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/bergdahlisis.asp http://badsatiretoday.com/terrorist-exchanged-isis-commander/
Snopes lol. A liberal lying piece of shit. If you believe snopes you are stupid.
Sigh....... If you ignore the truth, you're stupid. "...Snopes lol. A liberal lying piece of shit..." Please cite examples of "lies" published by Snopes.
The "church" of Jameson. Meet his Pastors or maybe Gods. These two bosos that Jameson leans on are all knowing in his "mind".
Ok, so you have nothing.....right.? Of course not. Not a single example of "Snopes" publishing lies......
You are an amusing stooge. You come here and proclaim snopes is some kind of God site. That they are the arbiters of truth. When the people you worship are actually two homely liberal pieces of shit. You haven't proved this article inaccurate yet. You know the subject of the thread.
You're ridiculous, and this statement is a lie. The "national report" is satire. Look that word up, you clearly have no idea what it means. Your story is fake. As much as you want this story to be true, it simply isn't. http://realorsatire.com/nationalreport-net/ http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/10/05/fox-falls-for-fake-story-about- obama-personally/196304 http://www.onthemedia.org/story/news-website-nationalreportnet-fake/
That may be true. I said I don't know if it is true. I do know that snopes is run by snot dribbling liberal pieces of shit though.
So you feel that the people behind Snopes.com are "snot dribbling liberal pieces of shit".....right? Please tell me what has caused them to be a target of your hatred? Is it because they are different in their views than you? Are you so insecure in your commitment to whatever you claim to believe that you instantly label them (or anyone with whom you disagree) an enemy, and attempt to defame them? And FYI, I really don't care what their political leanings are, I do not feel that they are god-like, nor do I worship them. What is interesting, and what I hope you can learn from this discussion, is that it is not a binary world in which we live, and it is only when we choose to not limit our thinking that real progress can be made personally, intellectually, and spiritually. Wouldn't you agree?
Snopes Lies……. PART TWO September 28, 2010 twg2a PitBull Leave a comment Rate This This email received this morning. More on Snopes and dishonesty. I’ve known for a while now that snopes lies, and I’m glad to see others catching on to this scheme. On several different occasions I got an answer from snopes that, after doing further research of my own, found to be leftist lies. Supported and defended by W. Scott Lewis with Campus Carry, Students for Concealed Carry on Campus and Concealed Campus. How very sad that those organizations have turned out to be as anti-American as B.O. and his evil regime. I told Scott Lewis TWICE to stop sending me email. He instead chose to send more email, and post in various forums (including Colbert’s!) attempting to demonize and ridicule me and this effort to expose snopes for what they are. He’s a schill for this regime. scott@campuscarry.com IP ADDRESS: 66.68.70.168 Here is one of the the stories he posted for his left-handed circle jerk of limp-wristed sissies: http://forums.colbertnation.com/?page=ThreadView&thread_id=22672 ________________________________________________ Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source. For the past few years ( http://www.snopescom/ has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com . It is run by a husband and wife team – that’s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. The reason for the questions – or skepticisms – is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the ‘true’ bottom of various issues. A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the Internet, ‘supposedly’ the Mikkelson’s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com . In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ‘ever’ took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg’s contact phone numbers – and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec’s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg that no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, snopes.com issued a statement as the ‘final factual word’ on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things – not! Then it has been learned the Mikkelson’s are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the Internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson’s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock? So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line fact ‘proceed with caution.’ Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always search a subject and do the research yourself. Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False. Then they gave their liberal slant! I have suspected some problems with snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder. I have recently discovered that Snopes.com is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to You tube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not trust Snopes.com, ever for anything that remotely resembles truth! I don’t even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore. SNOPES LIES. Snopes is a HOAX. A Leftist HOAX. Share this:
There are no replies to Comment # 18. End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestNational Report
#2. To: Jameson (#1)
You know this isn't true, don't you?
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2)
I don't know if it is true or not. Do you have some special knowledge on the subject?
#4. To: Jameson (#3)
#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)
If you believe snopes you are stupid.
#7. To: Jameson (#5)
#8. To: A K A Stone (#7)
#9. To: Jameson (#8)
Ok, so you have nothing.....right.?
#10. To: A K A Stone (#9)
You come here and proclaim snopes is some kind of God site.
#11. To: Jameson (#10)
#15. To: A K A Stone (#11)
I do know that snopes is run by snot dribbling liberal pieces of shit though.
#18. To: Jameson (#15)
Replies to Comment # 18.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]