LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: With School Choice, Liberals are not Pro-Choice
Source:
patriotupdate.com
URL Source: http://patriotupdate.com/articles/w ... -not-pro-choice/#ixzz2QFIBCHZu
Published: Apr 12, 2013
Author: David L. Goetsch
Post Date: 2013-04-12 06:59:49 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 3898
Comments: 10
With School Choice, Liberals are not Pro-Choice Written on Wednesday, April 10, 2013 by David L. Goetsch It turns out that pro-choice liberals are not so pro-choice after all—especially on issues other than abortion. According to pro-choice liberals it is acceptable for a mother to abort her unborn child, but it is not acceptable for the same mother to choose where her living child will go to school. Contradictions such as this are common in the rarified atmosphere of liberal elitism. Such contradictions in logic are bound to happen when liberals manipulate the English language for their own nefarious purposes. When the English language is used to distort the truth those distortions sometimes come back to haunt the distorter. Liberals have turned manipulation of the English language into an art form for the purpose of advancing their destructive social agenda but every once in a while their self-serving distortions sneak up behind them and bite in the form of contradictions in logic, reason, and common sense. For example, if a woman should have the right to choose to abort her unborn child, why should she not have the right to choose where she sends her living child to school? It seems that liberals are not really pro-choice after all. They support choice only when choice supports the liberal agenda. On the issue of school choice, liberals are definitely not pro-choice. From what I have been able to determine, liberals oppose school choice for one or both of two reasons. First, they are opposed to parents receiving vouchers that help pay the tuition at private schools. Liberals willingly admit their opposition to vouchers although a voucher is nothing more than taxpaying parents receiving back some of the taxes they have already paid and must continue to pay even though their children no longer attend public schools. Criticism of vouchers by liberals should come as no surprise. Liberals love taxes, and they will not give them up without a fight. The second reason liberals oppose school choice is that it removes children with pliable young minds from daily leftwing indoctrination sessions. Public schools are leftwing incubators that produce a steady supply of brainwashed young people for self-serving politicians intent on building an ever-expanding base of entitled, dependent voters. This, the acquisition and retention of political power, is the real reason liberals oppose school choice, though they are loathe to admit it. This is why they continue to oppose school choice even when advocates are willing to forgo vouchers as in the case of homeschooling. Students who are educated rather than indoctrinated are the liberals’ worst nightmare. Students who are taught to think for themselves will soon question the contradictions in logic that must be accepted if the liberal worldview is to prevail. Liberals know that a school voucher is a “Get-Out-of-Jail-Free” card for students whose parents want them to get a real education. Every student educated in a private school, Christian school, or homeschool is another candidate for dependency lost to the left. As of this writing, 21 states provide parents school choice: Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah, and Arizona. According to the Heritage Foundation, school choice generates the following beneficial results: Higher graduation rates Better student performance More satisfied parents In other words, liberals who oppose school choice oppose higher graduation rates, better student performance, and more parent satisfaction. What does that say about liberals?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: CZ82 (#0)
(Edited)
A Mother can't choose her Health Insurance either. A Mother can't choose WIC products. A Mother can't choose a Living Wage. Anything else? O A Mother can't choose a Pre Natal Program.
Indiana passed ... right to work --- school vouchers - choice ! Liberals - freaks - minorities - obomba bots - SLAVES ... mouthing piety - shouting mantras ---- mau mau - Zulus - neocom - nazis ! spear chucking ... bongo drum banging head hunters --- gun - bible grabbing crazies
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
A Mother can't choose WIC products. A Mother can't choose a Living Wage. Anything else? A mother can choose to be responsible and get a job. A White man can't keep his own money because he has to pay for your WIC. White man can't afford to send his kids to college because he has to pay for the minorities school. White man can't find a living wage job because Obama's paying people to watch Jerry Springer. Mcgowanjm can sit around the internet all day because real men are out working to pay for his welfare.
MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA REALLY!? And put the child where? And pay for the child being where. On Min Wage. UR SERIOUS Obama guts Medicare/SS..... USSA Third World in all but name.
And put the child where? And pay for the child being where. On Min Wage. UR SERIOUS Why did the mother get pregnant if she couldn't afford it? Why do I have to pay for her mistake? If she can't afford the kid put the kid in a state run orphanange and put it up for adoption. Did your mama raise you or put you in daycare? Is it true you still live in your mamas basement? Shouldn't you consider gettting a job there are mothers who need babysitters. Maybe some stupid liberal would let you watch their kids.
MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA REALLY!? And put the child where? And pay for the child being where. At least in the world I live in that's what family is for, they all chip in to help out each other... I guess Leftard parents are too busy watching Jerry Springer and smoking dope...
"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."
So what if the 'family' has been destroyed by the State? What if the Family could not make ends meet and yet wasn't wealthy enough to get that October 2008 bush43 Bail out? Family's 'chip in'.....MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Families have been 'chipping in' since Ronnie/Thatcher have been raping them....35 fucking years is a long fucking time to be chipping in.....;}
You guessed wrong! And You and JW are about the ONLY people who don't do drugs. You don't smoke or cuss either. Makes you kinda psychotic, eh? Stupid fuck....fuck your Ad Hominems....asshole.... See!? Like that.....;}
That is why W and Reagan lowered taxes. Your asshole murderer friends raise taxes to destroy the family. Also two queers are never a family. They are a disease on society waiting to be snuffed out.
That is why W and Reagan lowered taxes. MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHA So the Richest 1% got wealthier than ever. And thus destroyed the Bottom 99% Families..... But answer my question. Ding Dong the Witch is Dead.....
#2. To: CZ82 (#0)
#3. To: mcgowanjm (#1)
A Mother can't choose her Health Insurance either.
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)
(Edited)
A mother can choose to be responsible and get a job.
#5. To: mcgowanjm (#4)
REALLY!?
#6. To: mcgowanjm (#4)
A mother can choose to be responsible and get a job.
#7. To: CZ82 (#6)
At least in the world I live in that's what family is for,
#8. To: CZ82 (#6)
I guess Leftard parents are too busy watching Jerry Springer and smoking dope...
#9. To: mcgowanjm (#7)
So what if the 'family' has been destroyed by the State?
#10. To: A K A Stone (#9)
So what if the 'family' has been destroyed by the State?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]