United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Gun magazine maker who threatened to leave CO over magazine limits, now making smaller magazines
Source:
blogs.militarytimes.com
URL Source: http://blogs.militarytimes.com/gear ... m3-ms4-sling-and-mag-limiters/
Published: Apr 9, 2013
Author: n/a
Post Date: 2013-04-09 15:04:54 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 78606
Comments: 126
Magpul releases 10 round PMAG M3, MS4 sling and mag Limiters The PMAG 10 AR/M4 GEN M3 5.56×45 NATO magazine was designed to be your friend when working in the prone. Its shorter length means you can get lower and work fingertip mag changes instead of having to manhandle a larger mag under the gun. Incorporating new material technology and manufacturing processes for enhanced strength, durability, and reliability, the PMAG 10 provides next-generation performance for those needing lower profile magazines. $13.95 The PMAG Round Limiters install in 10, 20, or 30 round GEN M3 magazines, reducing the magazine capacity by 5 or 10 rounds. Designed for sporting and hunting applications, installation of the Limiter is simple, tool-less, and requires no permanent modification of the magazine body. Minus 5 PMAG Round Limiter and Minus 10 PMAG Round Limiter are both $13.95.
Poster Comment: I support universal background checks, the magasine limitation of ten rounds and strong restrictions on assault rifles. One can both support the second amendment and restrictions that help save the lives of people, especially those of children. There is no conflict in doing that.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-8) not displayed.
.
.
.
#9. To: Ferret Mike (#6)
Got ya. The TV programmed you. You used to believe in the second amendment (allegedly) but now you "have changed your mind".
I am. I just went to the Nest and reviewed the person's posts this past week and she said noting about me. Next time quote the material, and address the question to the person the post is about. I had a head injury that is well known because it involved an incident that was quite public. Many people have head injuries, and one of the common side affects of them is chronic depression and memory loss. Whether I too have these effects from my 43 foot fall to the pavement putting me in a coma for a time, what of it and why is it a business of yours'?
You show signs of being hyper-vigilant and overly paranoid. I could also contend that you should ask yourself if you are someone who should be handling firearms, not me. You are not a medical practitioner, and neither am I, so it is inappropriate to go to where you have led the discussion. If this is the best you have to offer in debate, I have nothing more to say on this thread.
I think Madison was incorrect here. So are you on Obama's side in this gun control thing they have going on?
You show signs of being a liar. A proven liar.
You are saying you "changed your mind" and no longer support the second amendment. Since you are on anti depressants (and some people on them have been known to wack out and kill people) Do you feel a duty to not have a firearm? Is that what changed your mind? Knowing that you shouldn't have any firearms since you take drugs for your depression.
Also. Since most in congress aren't medical practitioners. Do they have any business voting on this? Except Rand Paul since he has medical experience.
You are paranoid and I have no use for our whacked out, over the top and insulting way you comport yourself. I am very much in support of the Second Amendment, and I have no interest in discussing my medical record just because someone else discusses it in Robin's Nest. The Congress in all likelihood will give in to the political reality that most of the political races sponsored by the NRA the last election failed. They will recognize that over ninety percent of people support comprehensive background checks and will pass them into law. NRA sponsored laws in Louisiana have put convicted felons back on the street who were in possession of firearms. These same laws also passed in several other states are getting a hard look by lawmakers there who do not want felons in possession of firearms, and the NRA can expect the backlash to this recent development to grow. The ground has shifted away from them, and they are no longer just going to get their way in issues involving gun rights. Now, if you want to discuss the issues respectfully, you need to grow up and start doing so. I am a veteran of nine years in the U.S. Military, a gun owner, and I support vigorously the Second Amendment. If you can't accept that and be respectful in your approach to conversation in a thread, there is no foundation in place to talk to you on this issue.
Here is one of your many lies liar. Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41. #9. To: hondo68 (#0) (Edited) "Author: Ferret Annica (Gay)" Actually, that poster is a woman. As far as i know, she ain't banned. http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=27123&Disp=41&Trace=on
You are a delusional liar Mike. Like I just said. Now go take some more drugs for your depression you addict.
2 posts ago I proved you are a liar. Now you lie again. You said you "changed your mind". You are no supporter of the second amendment. You are a lying satanist witch. Your home is the lake of fire. Well it will be if you keep going this way. I hope it isn't your home Mike. But we both know it will be.
Says the gracious web site owner...
That is where unrepentant liars end up Fred. That is what your church teaches. By the way you left off the part where I said I hope it isn't his home. Have a good day Fred.
Just so you know, I'll be taking a one month sabbatical beginning this weekend. I won't be online and will be on the high seas. I'll follow the news as best I can but getting away from it all will likely be therapeutic for me.
What kind of high seas? What are you going to do?
. Asian Cruise. I won't pay $30 an hour for 'net access.
Have a good trip Fred. Sounds fun.
A European Missionary to Imperial China would have better luck. ;}
Tuesday, April 09, 2013 Ten Years On... April 9, 2013 marks ten years since the fall of Baghdad. Ten years since the invasion. Since the lives of millions of Iraqis changed forever. It’s difficult to believe. It feels like only yesterday I was sharing day to day activities with the world. I feel obliged today to put my thoughts down on the blog once again, probably for the last time. In 2003, we were counting our lives in days and weeks. Would we make it to next month? Would we make it through the summer? Some of us did and many of us didn't. Back in 2003, one year seemed like a lifetime ahead. The idiots said, “Things will improve immediately.” The optimists were giving our occupiers a year, or two… The realists said, “Things won’t improve for at least five years.” And the pessimists? The pessimists said, “It will take ten years. It will take a decade.” Looking back at the last ten years, what have our occupiers and their Iraqi governments given us in ten years? What have our puppets achieved in this last decade? What have we learned? We learned a lot. We learned that while life is not fair, death is even less fair- it takes the good people. Even in death you can be unlucky. Lucky ones die a ‘normal’ death… A familiar death of cancer, or a heart-attack, or stroke. Unlucky ones have to be collected in bits and pieces. Their families trying to bury what can be salvaged and scraped off of streets that have seen so much blood, it is a wonder they are not red. We learned that you can be floating on a sea of oil, but your people can be destitute. Your city can be an open sewer; your women and children can be eating out of trash dumps and begging for money in foreign lands. We learned that justice does not prevail in this day and age. Innocent people are persecuted and executed daily. Some of them in courts, some of them in streets, and some of them in the private torture chambers. We are learning that corruption is the way to go. You want a passport issued? Pay someone. You want a document ratified? Pay someone. You want someone dead? Pay someone. We learned that it’s not that difficult to make billions disappear. We are learning that those amenities we took for granted before 2003, you know- the luxuries – electricity, clean water from faucets, walkable streets, safe schools – those are for deserving populations. Those are for people who don’t allow occupiers into their country. We’re learning that the biggest fans of the occupation (you know who you are, you traitors) eventually leave abroad. And where do they go? The USA, most likely, with the UK a close second. If I were an American, I’d be outraged. After spending so much money and so many lives, I’d expect the minor Chalabis and Malikis and Hashimis of Iraq to, well, stay in Iraq. Invest in their country. I’d stand in passport control and ask them, “Weren’t you happy when we invaded your country? Weren’t you happy we liberated you? Go back. Go back to the country you’re so happy with because now, you’re free!” As A K A and his ZioFundies think Iraq/the Afghans/the War of 9/11 was a Spectacular success, arguing for apologies for WMD will be futile.
Careful there, he might pull a Robin on you.
Careful there, he might pull a Robin on you. And like I said then: I've been kicked out of better bars than this......;}
War Academy in the Arkansas Derby? I'm sticking with Verrazano to win the big Derby...watch out for Normandy Invasion.
With a rude and delusional post like that, all you deserve is to be told to go fuck yourself.
His main problem is he fails to realize that to run a site, one has to let go of a megalomaniacs notion they are inherently always right. he has no respect for anyone but himself and is completely impossible to talk to. Small wonder there is more life on the surface of Mercury then on this ghost town of a forum. He will never learn to do anything other then living the insanity of trying the same thing over and over again in here expecting different results and not getting them.
Mike you are a proven liar. Mike you are against the second amendment. Mike you are an ignorant fool.
I see your baitful sentence, now what is your argument? All you know how to do is lay down a toothless taunt. I feel sorry for you.
Get a room, you two.
. I'll go with the expert....;} I bet the AR Derby Winner in the Triple Crown. IT usually wins at least one leg.....;}
I hope it isn't your home Mike. But we both know it will be. One of the Main reasons I hate your god. Such a Vicious bastard. And humans nothing but yeast. Easy Marks.....I know.... let's tell them they have FREE WILL......we can pop 'em like ants under a magnifying glass......;}
Such a Vicious bastard. That is why God is so great. The evil people get sent to the lake of fire. I think it heats Heaven. You're going to be my log heating my room. If you keep rejecting your creator. Like wise men have said. People choose hell. Don't make a stupid choice clown. Please wake up.
I dedicate this to you.
[Chorus:] Where do bad folks go when they die? They don't go to heaven where the angels fly They go down to the lake of fire and fry Won't see 'em again till the fourth of July I knew a lady who came from Duluth She got bit by a dog with a rabid tooth She went to her grave just a little too soon And she flew away howling on the yellow moon [Chorus] Now the people cry and the people moan And they look for a dry place to call their home And try to find some place to rest their bones While the angels and the devils Fight to claim them for their own
Instead of the religious pontification, how about sticking to the thread topic and give an argument or two? Are you totally incapible of backing up your claim that comprehensive background checks violates the Second Amendment? I am simply not interested in hearing how badly you hate any religion but your own.
Only since 1934,and that was and is un-Constitutional. The US Supreme Court admitted this itself in the Miller case in 1939 when they ruled that the 2nd Amendment only applied to weapons suitable for military use. In truth,they were even wrong about that since not a single one of the elitist leftist bastards had ever served a single day in uniform,and had no freaking idea what kinds of weapons are appropriate for military use and which aren't. The 2nd Amendment is PRIMARILY directed towards military-grade weapons,but as been proven in every conflict between tribes since the dawn of time,people can and will use pretty much anything to kill one another. For example,wine bottles filled with gasoline were pretty damn effective in taking out tanks in WW-2. Does that make you want to ban gasoline and empty wine bottles? And people cannot possess RPG rocket launchers and rounds. Sure they can,and do. Your ability to own them is only limited by your income. Shit,Steven Speilberg has TWO SS-20 Russian ICBM's,complete with the launch trucks. With the murder of young children at Sandy Hook and because of the many mass killings people have done using these tools I have changed my mind about, there should be further restrictions as I indicated. So what? The Bill of Rights aren't based on your emotions. The bans are constitutional if passed, and does not damage the Second Amendment. Yeah,and there really is a rabbit that hides chicken eggs on Easter.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
No,it doesn't. Never has,never will. It just makes it more inconvenient. and is supported by over ninty percent of the general public. Whoopee! 90 percent of the general public supported public hangings right after arrest in some cases,as well as slavery. I guess maybe you are now supporting public hangings and slavery because that's what the majority wanted,and chances are would approve of today if given the option? The bans against high capacity magasines and further restrictions on assualt weapons makes mass killings much harder to do and make good sense. They are also supported by a vast majority of the general public. Ahhhh,yes! Once again you are falling back on the tyranny of the majority and confusing it with reason. You DO understand that democracy is mob rule,right?
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
No,you are NOT. What you support is a watered-down PC version of the 2nd Amendment. and I have no interest in discussing my medical record just because someone else discusses it in Robin's Nest. Gee,I wonder if that is because your personal medical record would make YOU one of the persecuted? Not only because of the medicine you are taking,but on top of that you have a record of being prepared to use violence and weapons to harm or kill others. The federal government already has all the evidence they need to justify sending you off to a labor camp in some remote area to protect the public from attack. It would be "for the chil-runs',of course. They have a right to be protected from attack by violent monsters like you. Don't try to deny it,the Department of the Army has the proof. They will recognize that over ninety percent of people support comprehensive background checks and will pass them into law. If 90 percent of the people polled by CNN and the Huffington Post supported making all real property collectively-owned (a real possibility) ,I guess you think that should be passed into law,too? NRA sponsored laws in Louisiana have put convicted felons back on the street who were in possession of firearms. EXCELLENT NEWS! This means the Bill of Rights are still working,and unpopular people as well as popular people still have some protections from a over-reaching and power-mad oppressive government. It was perfectly legal for convicted felons who had served their time to own any weapon or weapons they wanted to own and could afford to have from the day our country was founded until the Gun Control Act of 1968 was signed into "law". For almost 200 years,this wasn't a problem. Suddenly it was,and the government has been illegally putting citizens in prison ever since. The ground has shifted away from them, and they are no longer just going to get their way in issues involving gun rights. Hey,Mike! You love that majority rule stuff so much how about we put it to the vote that minorities not receive ANY special treatment or considerations,and be treated exactly like white citizens both in terms of rights and responsibilities? How about we put it to majority vote that anybody seen crossing the border anywhere but at official crossings can be considered to be a illegal alien invader,and shot on sight? I am a veteran of nine years in the U.S. Military, a gun owner, and I support vigorously the Second Amendment. According to your own writings your door should be kicked in,your gun seized,and you should be imprisoned in a mental institution for having it. After all,isn't that the way a majority of the voting public think someone with such a violent history and record of being prepared to do violence with deadly weapons should be dealt with? And you can't even claim you were just doing your duty,either. You volunteered for the airborne infantry,and you volunteered for Special Forces. Man up and turn yourself in! After all,it's what 90 percent of the people polled by the Huffington Post,The NYT,CNN,and the DNC are demanding. Not to mention the old CPUSA,whatever the Progressive Party are calling themselves today,whatever the Democratic Socialists of America are calling themselves today,etc,etc,etc.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Says the gracious web site owner... LOL! You couldn't cut irony that thick with a chainsaw!
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
You are going on a 1 week Carnival Cruise? Make sure you take a porta potty. I don't think those big fancy boats like to see people just "hanging it over the side.". Does bad things to the paint.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
The one requirement needed to both run a site and act as a poster and moderator there at the same time is a split-personality. No normal person can wear both of those hats at the same time.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Comments (50 - 126) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI have changed my mind about,
#10. To: A K A Stone (#3)
(Edited)
"You are Mike."
#11. To: A K A Stone (#9)
(Edited)
"(allegedly)"
#12. To: nolu chan (#4)
Let a regular army, fully equal to theresources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at thedevotion of the federal government; still it would not be going toofar to say, that the State governments, with the people on theirside, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number towhich, according to the best computation, a standing army can becarried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of thewhole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the numberable to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the UnitedStates, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half amillion of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by menchosen from among themselves, fighting for their commonliberties, and united and conducted by governments possessingtheir affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether amilitia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such aproportion of regular troops.
#13. To: Ferret Mike (#11)
You show signs of being hyper-vigilant and overly paranoid.
#14. To: Ferret Mike (#11)
You are not a medical practitioner, and neither am I, so it is inappropriate to go to where you have led the discussion.
#15. To: Ferret Mike (#11)
You are not a medical practitioner, and neither am I, so it is inappropriate to go to where you have led the discussion.
#16. To: A K A Stone (#13)
"You show signs of being a liar. A proven liar."
#17. To: Ferret Mike (#16)
#18. To: Ferret Mike (#16)
You are paranoid and I have no use for our whacked out, over the top and insulting way you comport yourself.
#19. To: Ferret Mike (#16)
I am very much in support of the Second Amendment,
#20. To: A K A Stone (#19)
You are a lying satanist witch. Your home is the lake of fire.
#21. To: Fred Mertz (#20)
#22. To: A K A Stone (#21)
#23. To: Fred Mertz (#22)
Say hi to your mom for me.
#24. To: Biff Tannen (#23)
#25. To: Fred Mertz (#22)
#26. To: Ferret Mike (#7)
#27. To: Ferret Mike (#11)
#28. To: mcgowanjm (#27)
As A K A and his ZioFundies think Iraq/the Afghans/the War of 9/11 was a Spectacular success...
#29. To: Fred Mertz (#28)
As A K A and his ZioFundies think Iraq/the Afghans/the War of 9/11 was a Spectacular success...
#30. To: mcgowanjm, war (#29)
#31. To: A K A Stone (#19)
#32. To: Fred Mertz (#20)
"Says the gracious web site owner..."
#33. To: Ferret Mike (#32)
#34. To: Ferret Mike (#31)
With a rude and delusional post like that, all you deserve is to be told to go fuck yourself.
#35. To: A K A Stone (#34)
"Mike you are against the second amendment."
#36. To: Ferret Mike, A K A Stone (#35)
Say hi to your mom for me.
#37. To: Fred Mertz (#30)
#38. To: A K A Stone, Freet Mike, All (#19)
You are a lying satanist witch. Your home is the lake of fire. Well it will be if you keep going this way.
#39. To: mcgowanjm (#38)
One of the Main reasons I hate your god.
#40. To: mcgowanjm, Ferret Mike (#38)
#41. To: sneakypete, mcgowinjm, ferret mike, Jethro Tull (#40)
#42. To: Ferret Mike (#35)
#43. To: A K A Stone (#41)
#44. To: Ferret Mike (#6)
There have long been restrictions on fully automatic weapons. And people cannot possess RPG rocket launchers and rounds.
#45. To: Ferret Mike (#7)
The universal background check helps kep criminald and the mentally ill from possessing firearms
#46. To: Ferret Mike (#16)
(Edited)
I am very much in support of the Second Amendment,
#47. To: Fred Mertz, A K A Stone (#20)
You are a lying satanist witch. Your home is the lake of fire.
#48. To: Fred Mertz (#22)
I'll be taking a one month sabbatical beginning this weekend. I won't be online and will be on the high seas.
#49. To: Ferret Mike (#32)
His main problem is he fails to realize that to run a site, one has to let go of a megalomaniacs notion they are inherently always right.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]