LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: A New Kind of Freedom
Source:
Americans for a Free Republic
URL Source: http://campaign.r20.constantcontact ... leB57wQfG4aRORlUB5iTT-Ag%3D%3D
Published: Nov 8, 2012
Author: Nelson Hultberg
Post Date: 2012-11-11 12:51:42 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 7671
Comments: 21
Karl Marx was asked once how he could justify advocating a political system of slavery for the individual, which is what socialism is. He replied that, socialism is not slavery; it is a "new kind of freedom." As all perceptive students of history know, the intellectuals of Europe bought into such Alice in Wonderland sophistry and plunged into the twentieth century nightmare of collectivist tyranny. But unfortunately so did American intellectuals about 30 years later when the Progressives of Woodrow Wilson's era established the Creature from Jekyl Island to usher in centralized government banking and the progressive income tax to "spread the wealth around."
Socialism is not really so bad, reasoned the American intellectual community. If we think about it, it actually is a "new kind of freedom." We just have to do what the Red Queen and the Mad Hatter advocated. We have to change the meaning of the words that define the fundamental values of our lives. After all, there is no objective reality; words can mean whatever we want them to mean. All we have to do is teach Marx's new definition of freedom to the young at an early enough age, and when they grow into adulthood they will not think of a government-dominated society as slavery at all. It will be a "new kind of freedom" to them.
Americans never bought into Lenin's violent revolutionary socialism, but they did buy into the Fabians' democratic evolutionary socialism. Fabian ideas in Britain were readily picked up by the American progressives and liberals of the twentieth century. This redefinition of values has been consuming us now for 100 years ever since the Creature from Jekyl Island and the tax revenuers took over Washington. The progressives and liberals have even redefined their redefinitions. Fascism, being basically the same as socialism, is now acceptable in the mix.
What is horrifying is that Barack Obama's election victory is tied directly to this corruption of values. We have now elected, for a second time, a man who was raised by communists in Hawaii. Obama's mind was forged from the likes of Frank Marshall Davis, a powerful and radical communist apparatchick of the fifties, sixties, and seventies. Davis was Obama's constant companion from the age of 9 to 18 before he went off to Occidental College in Los Angeles. His worldview is thus the Marxian sophistry that socialism is a "new kind of freedom." In the mind of Obama, individuals like Hank Rearden and Dagny Taggart are not entrepreneurial benefactors to their fellow man; they are evil rich people who exploit their fellow man. These evil rich need to be leveled down. And the way to do it is insidiously, governmentally with ever-expanding redistribution of wealth programs and ever-expanding monetary inflation.
One of Ayn Rand's powerful insights in Atlas Shrugged is that dictatorships take over because the people actually approve of them. She called it the "sanction of the victim." This attitude now permeates the American electorate. Nietzsche's "slave mentalities" dominate the throngs of voters that determine what our government is to do. The great majority of Americans are demonstrating that they actually want to be enslaved.
Rand also made the following observation: When asked once why she voted Republican if she thought both parties had sold out to collectivism, she replied that both parties are headed toward the abyss, but Democrats wish to charge toward it and Republicans wish to creep toward it. She, no doubt, felt that we have more time to educate the people as to what is happening with Republicans in power.
Well, America just ran out of time this past election night. A majority of American voters indicated that they believe government owes them a living along with health care, security, and self-esteem. They indicated that they are very comfortable with the Fabian march into socialist-fascism that has been taking place ever since the Creature was instituted in 1913. They indicated that they believe rich people don't earn their wealth; they steal it from the kindly masses by siphoning off the surplus productivity of their labor and reducing them to grinding poverty. (This is the fallacious "labor theory of value" that Marx perpetuated.)
Unfortunately this fallacious reasoning is why so many Americans have become so slothful and are choosing to vote for a living rather than work for a living. It is the reason why so many productive men and women in America are poisoned with guilt and now tolerate the egregious, confiscatory taxes that are destroying the dynamism of our economy and the sanity of our lives. Justice and prosperity cannot be built by catering to slothful masses with theoretical fallacies.
The slothful masses now control America through an Orwellian czar in Washington whose mentor was a rabid communist apparatchik in the 1970s, and whose close advisors (Bill Ayres, Jeremiah Wright, Valerie Jarrett, etc.) have always been radical leftist haters of America. This Orwellian czar is now a lame duck President and doesn't have to run again. All that blocks him from ravaging our rights and freedoms is a supine Senate and a timid array of House Republicans. Will these political sycophants be able to stand up to him and the new hordes of entitlement seekers that bolster him with their eager votes? Not likely. Congress will, instead, begin to reach out to the new entitlement seekers along with the pressing hordes of illegals and their comrades waiting in the wings for entrance to America.
Jean Raspail's Camp of the Saints looms over the horizon. Congressional sycophants will begin to emulate Fox News analyst, Kirsten Powers, who gleefully reported on election night: "We are now a brown nation." They will begin to reevaluate their position on the illegals. They will reason that another 15 million illiterate anti-Americans amidst us is no problem. To paraphrase Nixon, "We're all Multiculturalists now."
Thus Obama will push full-blown for amnesty for the illegals and Marx's redefinition of slavery into a "new kind of freedom." We will charge toward the abyss at a speed never before employed. Obama and the Creature will gobble up the last of our freedoms. America will become a giant replica of Greece.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: We The People, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#0)
(Edited)
Even the dullest witted should have realized it was all over, by the time Romney was officially nominated? At that point, it didn't matter which of the D&R puppets won.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
What the nameless morons who didn't vote for Romney fail to understand. Is that we are now in a much worse circumstance. By rejecting Romney now the Republicans are going to move further left. The people who don't vote have enabled the parasite class to take over.
Right into the ash heap of history. Good place for them, they'll never get elected by going left. Repent, or die GOP! They're stupid and evil, so they'll continue to choose death.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Yeah,you would naturally think that,but you would be wrong. Just look at all the people blaming everybody but the RNC and Rombama for Rombama's loss. Not only that,but look at all the talking heads on tv and top Republican officials saying the reason we lost was because Romney is too white and too conservative,and that if we want to win we need to go brown and progressive. They are admitting they have no principles other than winning,and the Party People who vote for them just don't seem to care.
A wise man once said,"If you wish to live your life as a good man,try to be the man your dog thinks you are."
That may be the most upside down/backwards thing I have ever seen. You are actually trying to blame people who refused to vote for Rombama because he is a globalist/leftist for the alleged Republican Party going even further left next time! I'll give you an unpleasant truth,the Republican leadership feel free to babble the "we MUST go progressive and brown to win in the future" crap because of people like YOU! Party People they KNOW can be counted on to vote for the "lesser of two evils" everytime,no matter how "evil" the candidate may be. ALL you care about is that the candidate have a "R" behind his name,and that's good enough! Guess what? It is Party People like you that are responsible for the alleged Republicans not running ONE single conservative candidate ever since Reagan left office. It started with that evil old bastard Poppy Bush,and has gotten worse each election since then. The nation can thank Party People like you for THIS.
A wise man once said,"If you wish to live your life as a good man,try to be the man your dog thinks you are."
And even then Reagan raised taxes eleven times, mostly on the middle class..
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
Let's see. The "less left" party runs an authoritarian leftist named John McCain and lost because the liberty vote stayed at home or voted third party. The "less left" party's answer was to run an even more authoritarian leftist named Mitt Romney, who received even less votes than McCain did. You are probably right. The less left party will likely elect an even more left wing moron in the next election. And guess what? That moron will receive less votes than Romney did and your party will lose again. What the less left party and its partisan supporters do not grasp is that they will never be able to out-Democrat the Democrats. No matter how far to the left they go, they will never receive a significant number of votes from left wing voters. All they succeed in doing is driving even more conservatives away from them. Everyone has an enough is enough point and every time they move to the left more people reach that point. Until the less left party realizes this, rejects neoconservatism and reembraces traditional conservative values, they will lose and they have no ones but themselves to blame. All the whining and pointing fingers at everyone but themselves will not change that.
What is wrong with your analysis is this. Romney is to the right of McCain. He is to the right of HW Bush. He may even be to the right of W. Rand Paul 2016
Obviously there are a huge number of conservatives who disagree with that assessment considering he received less conservative votes than McCain did.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Ronald Reagan wouldn't even be let into the convention with todays breed of 'conservative' knuckle draggers. This I find comical when 'they' start praising RR.
It is not easy reconstructing 'molded minds'... Reagan didn't raise taxes. The Dim-controlled Congress is who raised the taxes. YOUR boys.
A wise man once said,"If you wish to live your life as a good man,try to be the man your dog thinks you are."
Oh,WOW! THAT far right? What does that make him,a Trotskyite?
A wise man once said,"If you wish to live your life as a good man,try to be the man your dog thinks you are."
YOUR boys. Republican's controlled congress for the first six of his eight years as president.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
This I find comical when 'they' start praising RR. They obsessively need a father figure to lead and obey and who else could they choose..in a field consisting of Nixon, Ford and the Bush's.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
Republican's controlled congress for the first six of his eight years as president. I don't believe that is true,but even IF is was,Presidents STILL don't raise taxes. Congress raises taxes.
A wise man once said,"If you wish to live your life as a good man,try to be the man your dog thinks you are."
You are not informed or a liar. Republicans won the House for the first time in 40 years in 1994.
Congress can only raise taxes if the 2/3 override a Presidential veto. It takes the President and congress otherwise.
Yea right... /s You guys never stop do ya??
“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box.”
True,but it is more true to state that it is the business of congress to write budgets,and presidents to sign them. The only real budget authority a president has is to sign the budget or to veto it,and even then congress can override the veto,as you pointed out.
A wise man once said,"If you wish to live your life as a good man,try to be the man your dog thinks you are."
W. Bush was a big spender. The truth is that Romney was the most economically conservative GOP nominee since Ronald Reagan. He was heads and shoulders above Bush I, Dole, and W. Bush. Yes, he has been all over the map on social issues. But I don't care as much that as the economy. Now, we are going to get MASSIVE new environmental regulations, higher taxes, probably another "stimulus" (political patronage to unions), and more nasty crap.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#2. To: We The People (#0)
#3. To: A K A Stone, *Constitution Party* (#2)
(Edited)
now the Republicans are going to move further left
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#4. To: hondo68 (#1)
Even the dullest witted should have realized it was all over, by the time Romney was officially nominated?
#5. To: A K A Stone (#2)
What the nameless morons who didn't vote for Romney fail to understand. Is that we are now in a much worse circumstance. By rejecting Romney now the Republicans are going to move further left. The people who don't vote have enabled the parasite class to take over.
#6. To: sneakypete (#5)
Guess what? It is Party People like you that are responsible for the alleged Republicans not running ONE single conservative candidate ever since Reagan left office.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#2)
By rejecting Romney now the Republicans are going to move further left.
#8. To: Fibr Dog (#7)
#9. To: A K A Stone (#8)
What is wrong with your analysis is this. Romney is to the right of McCain. He is to the right of HW Bush. He may even be to the right of W.
#10. To: A K A Stone, sneakypete, Fibr Dog (#8)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#11. To: mininggold (#6)
And even then Reagan raised taxes eleven times, mostly on the middle class..
#12. To: mininggold (#6)
And even then Reagan raised taxes eleven times, mostly on the middle class..
#13. To: A K A Stone (#8)
He may even be to the right of W.
#14. To: sneakypete (#12)
(Edited)
Reagan didn't raise taxes. The Dim-controlled Congress is who raised the taxes.
#15. To: Brian S (#11)
Ronald Reagan wouldn't even be let into the convention with todays breed of 'conservative' knuckle draggers.
#16. To: mininggold (#14)
Reagan didn't raise taxes. The Dim-controlled Congress is who raised the taxes. YOUR boys.
#17. To: mininggold (#14)
Republican's controlled congress for the first six of his eight years as president.
#18. To: sneakypete (#16)
I don't believe that is true,but even IF is was,Presidents STILL don't raise taxes.
#19. To: mininggold (#6)
And even then Reagan raised taxes eleven times, mostly on the middle class..
#20. To: A K A Stone (#18)
Congress can only raise taxes if the 2/3 override a Presidential veto. It takes the President and congress otherwise.
#21. To: A K A Stone (#8)
(Edited)
What is wrong with your analysis is this. Romney is to the right of McCain. He is to the right of HW Bush. He may even be to the right of W.
"we must as a species go into a period of shrinkage that we have not experienced since the Dark Ages and the Black Plague" -- lucysmom
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]