[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Rand Paul Endorses Mitt Romney
Source: RollCall
URL Source: http://atr.rollcall.com/rand-paul-endoses-mitt-romney/
Published: Jun 7, 2012
Author: By Ryan Teague Beckwith and Joshua Mille
Post Date: 2012-06-08 07:38:21 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 43566
Comments: 72

Rand Paul Endorses Mitt Romney

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Updated: 11:02 p.m.| Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney said this afternoon that he is “honored” to be endorsed by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

Paul’s father, Rep. Ron Paul (Texas), had run for the Republican presidential nomination against Romney in 2008 and this election cycle, but he essentially conceded the race in an email to supporters today.

“When it is all said and done, we will likely have as many as 500 supporters as delegates on the convention floor,” he wrote, according to the Houston Chronicle. “That is just over 20 percent! And while this total is not enough to win the nomination, it puts us in a tremendous position to grow our movement and shape the future of the GOP!”

In response to Sen. Paul’s endorsement, Romney praised his record.

“Sen. Paul has been a leading voice in the effort to scale back the size and reach of government and promote liberty,” he said, adding that he looks forward to “working with him to get America back on the right track.”

Sen. Paul, himself, is widely thought to harbor ambitions for higher office. “The assumption throughout the political community in Kentucky is that he’s a one-term Senator who is running for president in 2016,” said a Republican consultant deeply familiar with Kentucky. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

#1. To: We The People (#0)

Smart move by Rand. He didn't alienate the Republican base like his father did. Much smarter politically then Ron.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-08   7:45:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: A K A Stone (#1)

Smart move by Rand. He didn't alienate the Republican base like his father did. Much smarter politically then Ron.

Bullshit.

He dishonors his father. He'll pay a heavy price for that treachery.

I find it ironic, that I support Rand Paul's dad, more than he does.

What a sad charade our elections have become. How pathetic.

That you would try to white-wash this, makes me ask the logical question:

Exactly whose side are you on, anyway???

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-06-08   18:41:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Capitalist Eric (#9)

I find it ironic, that I support Rand Paul's dad, more than he does.

Ron Paul already said he doesn't have the delegates. He said this prior to Rand endorsing Romney.

Rand Paul is smarter then his dad.

Ron Paul couldn't even get behind constitutional amendment to ban abortion.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-08   18:46:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: A K A Stone (#10)

Rand Paul is smarter then his dad.

That will be the day.

He just threw away any cred he had, to endorse the neocon candidate. You never win by striking a bargain with the devil... That's just common sense.

Ron Paul couldn't even get behind constitutional amendment to ban abortion.

Classic straw-man argument.

Bottom line: you're grasping at straws to rationalize betrayal.

You demonstrate with an uncommon clarity, why this country is doomed. The elitists lie to your face, shit on you, and you justify it...

Why?

Because you lack the one weapon which would make all the difference: courage.

That so many other Americans are so weak and feckless as you, disgusts me.

Coward.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-06-11   13:33:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Capitalist Eric (#11)

You demonstrate with an uncommon clarity, why this country is doomed. The elitists lie to your face, shit on you, and you justify it...

Why?

Every person is an individual. You never know exactly what they are going to do. Romney is a different person then Obama. He is going to do things differently. Those are facts, do you agree?

Next. One of the will definitely be president. Would you agree that is a fact also?

Here is another fact. If you compare their positions against each other. Romney is better on some. The best Obama does is tie him.

Examples. They both support the military detention act. So they are a tie and Romney would be no worse.

War on terror. They both support it so a tie again.

Patriot act. They both support it, another tie.

Budget. I would expect Romney to do better. Romney plus 1.

Gay marriage. Obama supports it and even though Romney was governor of a state that did have it he never said he supported it. Again Romney is a little better. Romney plus another 1/2.

Who was it that met with the muslim brotherhood terrorists in the White House. That was Obama. - 1 for Obama Romeney wouldn't do that.

Taxes. Romney plus 1.

I can't think of a single issue that Obama is better then Romney on. Not one. Can you? Do you dispute anything I said here?

Romney sucks and I will vote for him. Some times you have to roll the dice.

If you don't vote one of them will still be president.

If you vote third part one of them will still be president.

I've voted third party before. Perot and Peroutka.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-11   15:57:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: A K A Stone (#12) (Edited)

Romney is a different person then Obama. He is going to do things differently. Those are facts, do you agree?

No, I do not agree.

Romney is bought-and-paid-for, by the same elitists that bought and paid for o'Bungler. That he was sighted at the Bidlerberger meeting last week should quash any notions that he'll be (as you say) a "different person." He'll do exactly what he's told to do- pushing endless warfare, crushing whatever vestige of value the dollar has, building the police-state and generally being a worthless POS. Yeah, he's just like o'Bungler, in every way that matters.

If you can't see that, you're delusional.

Next. One of the will definitely be president. Would you agree that is a fact also?

Which means precisely dick.

Here is another fact. If you compare their positions against each other. Romney is better on some. The best Obama does is tie him.

Aw, JEEZ!!!! I was going to post a bunch of pics to make the point, but instead chose only two, which make the point about mcRomney:

You can cherry-pick the various statements he's said, being on both sides of EVERY ISSUE. He has NO MORAL CORE, NO VALUES, NO CREDIBILITY.

I can't think of a single issue that Obama is better then Romney on. Not one. Can you?

Actually, the answer is "yes, I CAN."

You see, when mcRomney continues pushing the police-state machine, mainstream AMERICA will give him a "pass" for a while, because they'll (stupidly) think he's "better than Obama." At least with o'Bungler, we know what we're getting, we know what's coming, and people will be ready to take on the police- state thugs. With mcRomney, they'll be lulled (at least for a while), possibly making it too late for a lot of Americans to prepare for the economic collapse that IS COMING.

[Seriously, you need to read Cicero more.]

Other than that, I don't see any difference between mcRomney and o'Bungler.

I will not allow myself to fall into the false paradigm that you so foolishly still believe in. I'll write in Ron Paul's name. I will vote for him, and not sit at home.

I will not submit to the Kakuki theatrics, and vote for the "lesser of two evils," because that gives tacit approval to evil.

I stand for what I know to be right, and will not submit to anything less.

Romney sucks and I will vote for him. Some times you have to roll the dice.

If that's the best you can do, to justify your cowardice, than you're merely a shadow of a man, with no idea what it means to be a citizen.

If you don't vote one of them will still be president. If you vote third part one of them will still be president.

Another straw-man argument, which is a standard high-school tactic to divert from the truth. Can't say I'm surprised, any more.

I've voted third party before. Perot and Peroutka.

I voted for Perot, and Ron Paul in 2008. I will do the same again, for 2012.

Thankfully, I haven't sacrificed my principles, in the name of convenience.

The government has a boot on all of our necks.

The ONLY way to remove the boot, is to refuse to give your assent to be governed by a bunch of elitists, who have DESTROYED the Constitution of the United States of America. It ROBS the state of its legitimacy.

YOU think there's a difference between whether the boot on the back of your neck is the left one or the right one..... And that switching from the left boot to the right will suddenly make everything better?????

You're delusional.

RASCZAK: You. Tell me the moral difference, if any, between the citizen and the civilian?
JOHNNY: The difference lies in the field of civic virtue. A citizen accepts personal responsibility for the safety of the body politic, of which he is a member, defending it, if need be, with his life. The civilian does not.
-- Starship Troopers --

I am a citizen. You are merely a civilian. There IS a difference.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-06-11   17:02:39 ET  (2 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Capitalist Eric (#16)

Romney is a different person then Obama. He is going to do things differently. Those are facts, do you agree?

No, I do not agree.

Then you aren't smart. For no two people vote the exact same every time. Now lets try again. This time be honest and I will read the rest of what you have to say.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-11   17:37:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: A K A Stone (#21)

Stone: Romney is a different person then Obama. He is going to do things differently. Those are facts, do you agree?
Capitalist Eric: No, I do not agree.
Stone: Then you aren't smart.

Then you didn't read the rest of my answer. Here, I'll REPOST it again, for your edification:

Romney is bought-and-paid-for, by the same elitists that bought and paid for o'Bungler. That he was sighted at the Bidlerberger meeting last week should quash any notions that he'll be (as you say) a "different person." He'll do exactly what he's told to do- pushing endless warfare, crushing whatever vestige of value the dollar has, building the police-state and generally being a worthless POS. Yeah, he's just like o'Bungler, in every way that matters.

I'm smart enough to recognize a lying sack of shit when I see him. Romney, o'Bunger...? TWO lying sacks of shit.

It is you who isn't smart. Pity.

I expected more from you. Instead, you fold like a cheap suit.

So 8 year olds should be able to smoke crack if they have their parents permission?

Now you use the LoonyMing tactic, extrapolating to absurd heights? PLEASE. Such tactics smack of desperation.

AGAIN, look up the concepts of "Federalism," and study the subject of PROHIBITION very carefully, Stone... Your emotional responses make you look as weak and stupid as... well, LoonyMing.

Again, I expected better from you. What a shame...

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2012-06-11   18:20:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 28.

#31. To: Capitalist Eric (#28)

Romney is bought-and-paid-for, by the same elitists that bought and paid for o'Bungler. That he was sighted at the Bidlerberger meeting last week should quash any notions that he'll be (as you say) a "different person." He'll do exactly what he's told to do- pushing endless warfare, crushing whatever vestige of value the dollar has, building the police-state and generally being a worthless POS. Yeah, he's just like o'Bungler, in every way that matters.

You said they are identical. Meaning they will case every vote the same 100 percent of the time. You are insane if you think that. If you don't think that you just conceded my point.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-11 18:40:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Capitalist Eric (#28)

So 8 year olds should be able to smoke crack if they have their parents permission?

Now you use the LoonyMing tactic, extrapolating to absurd heights? PLEASE. Such tactics smack of desperation.

No I am taking your position to its logical conclusion.

Don't be a pussy. Answer the question. Should crack be legal for 8 year olds?

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-06-11 18:43:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com