[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Good Morning everyone my name is Devil Anse

Searing DOJ report says Ferguson PD routinely violated rights of African-Americans

Netanyahu and the Crumbling Israeli Lobby

Hillary Clinton's Private E-Mail Draws Scrutiny Hacker "Guccifer" first discovered backchannel receipt of intel info

Jon Stewart Blasts Benjamin Netanyahu Speech

Court Allows Jewish Prayer on Temple Mount

Alabama Supreme Court orders halt to same-sex marriages

Let us look at the law re: Clinton Emails

Alabama Supreme Court Orders Judges to Stop Gay Marriages

Ted Cruz: GOP leadership planned to cave on Obama’s illegal amnesty all along

South Florida Man Charged With Growing Marijuana, Found Not Guilty (Jury Nullification)

167 REPUBLICANS REBEL AGAINST BOEHNER, SPEAKER RAMS THROUGH BILL TO FUND OBAMA AMNESTY WITH DEMOCRAT VOTES

Nitrogen gas executions approved by Oklahoma House

W.Va. Senate OKs bill to allow concealed carry without permit

California Homes Raided in Investigation Into Chinese ‘Birth Tourism’

Stoner rabbits will run amok if Utah legalises marijuana, DEA agent warns

Hillary Clinton Sent Every Official Email as Secretary of State from a Private Account

Boehner: Pass Clean DHS Bill Today

Exclusive: GA Poll Shows Scott Walker Leading Field, Rand Paul at 4 Percent (Huck 2nd, Bush 3rd)

Feds raid Texas political meeting

You can get free pancakes at IHOP today

Duck Commander Phil Robertson’s CPAC speech was viral in so many ways

BOEHNER, PRIEBUS EX-CHIEFS OF STAFF AIR ADS TO PRESSURE CONSERVATIVES RESISTING EXECUTIVE AMNESTY

The Sad Plight of Jihadi John

The 21 Foot Rule

We Grow More Equal as Technology Dematerializes the World

Father’s Day as Hate Speech? Feminism, Gay Rights Contribute to Fatherlessness, Experts Say at CPAC

Israel, Iran and Obama all accuse each other of lying about nuclear deal

Trump: I'm the Only One Who Can Beat Hillary

Maybe it’s time to elect a senator rather than a governor

Most young Republicans support legalizing pot (63%)

Booting from flash drive (Win 7 - XP)

An open letter to RNC Chairman Reince Priebus regarding his comments at CPAC (Republican Liberty Caucus)

Live broadcast : Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to AIPAC (10am EST)

Americans Favor Legalizing Pot and Criminalizing Congress

Republicans seek coveted Benjamin Netanyahu speech tickets from boycotting Democrats

IN MIDST OF WAR, UKRAINE BECOMES GATEWAY FOR JIHAD (ISIS Helps American Backed Ukraine)

Ted Cruz spills secret of GOP amnesty sabotage

Obama Threatened to Shoot Down Israeli Jets Attacking Iran

Chicago's first black major league baseball player Minnie Minoso dies, age 90

‘No You’re Not!’ Former NSA Chief Heckled for Calling Himself a ‘Libertarian’ at CPAC

The National-Security State’s ISIS Racket

ISIS

Scott Walker's legislative years: A staunch conservative, then as now

Russia Could Make China King of the South China Sea

Attempt tp smear Scott Walker blows up in media's face

Jeb Bush’s Greatest Liability (Aside From His Immigration Enthusiasm) May Be His Wife

How a [vaccination] jab plunged my life into madness

Why Iran Believes ISIS is a U.S. Creation

The Malaria Project

Politically biased headlines


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 728
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com