[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Brat: 'Not one thin dime' for Obama's immigration plan

How Hollywood Accounting Can Make a $450 Million Movie 'Unprofitable'

Impeach President Obama—Why When Where and How

Georgia Man Shoots & Kills Man Who Mistakenly Pulled Into Driveway; Misdemeanor, $500 Fine (Castle Doctrine)

The Benghazi Brief – “Operation Zero Footprint” – What We Know About The Benghazi Mission, And Subsequent Attack

Ferguson Protests Grow Larger: ‘We Don’t Give a F--- about Your Laws’

How $10,000 In The Bank In 2008 Lost Over $7000 Of Wealth by 2013

The Use and Abuse of Executive Orders and Other Presidential Directives

BREAKING REPORT: DOJ Is Threatening #Ferguson Prosecutor With Bias Order Over No Indictment

‘Now, That’s What I Call a Friday News Dump’: Final Report Released After Two-Year Investigation Into Benghazi

Security Experts: What to do if protesters surround your car.

Liberal 2016 poll: Elizabeth Warren beating Clinton by double digits

FBI arrests two in connection with plot to set off bomb during protests - Ferguson

Arpaio v Obama, DCDC 14-cv-01966, Doc 1 COMPLAINT

Obama’s Amnesty Is The Act Of A Rogue President

Bandits in Guinea steal blood samples believed to be infected with Ebola

30,000 missing emails from IRS' Lerner recovered

House of Representatives v Burwell (COMPLAINT)

Obama releases Gitmo detainees, setting up fight with GOP

Texas Leaders Ready to Fight After Obama's Executive Action

HOUSE FILES CHALLENGE OVER THE CHANGES TO THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Will Scripted Ferguson Agenda Overshadow the Executive Amnesty Announcement?

Diplomat dumps burqa-clad fiancée due to crossed-eyes, beard

U.S. Senate Votes Against Freedom in the USA (Again)

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Files Lawsuit Against Obama over Amnesty Executive Order

HILLARY CLINTON: 'I SUPPORT THE PRESIDENT'S DECISION'

Patriots Headed to White House; Arrest Obama NOW! Pete Santilli Interviews US Marine Manny Vega

JEFF SESSIONS: NOW IS ‘TIME TO STAND STRONG’ AGAINST OBAMA’S ILLEGAL AMNESTY TO PROTECT AMERICAN WORKERS AND THEIR FAMILIES

Reagan and Bush Offer No Precedent for Obama's Amnesty Order

Bachmann to America: Come to D.C. on Dec. 3 & Rally to 'Defund Amnesty'

No, Reagan Did Not Offer An Amnesty By Lawless Executive Order

No, ‘Prosecutorial Discretion’ Does Not Justify Obama’s Lawless Amnesty

A Law Enforcement Perspective on Obama’s Lawlessness

The last reich ... obombacare - amnesty --- bread - circus - stepford nastion !

Here’s Obama’s Immigration Speech In Full--transcript

Obama's speech live

Jim Webb Forms Exploratory Committee for White House (Reagan Democrat)

Somali Actor who played Somali pirate in Tom Hanks blockbuster 'Captain Phillips' is jailed for vicious assault -- Sentencing Judge/Fanboi Impressed with Somali "Actors"

Muslims Chant to Remove Jesus at WashingtonÂ’s National Cathedral

Tipping Point: 50% of Americans reject the D&R terrorist party

Jordanian Parliament Prays for “Spirits of Heroes” Who Murdered 4 Rabbis

Does John Boehner Believe That Perjury About Sex Is Worse Then Obama Acting Like A Dictator And Bypassing Congress To Make Law?

mohammed obomba atta ... toppling the the twin towers --- of our country - constitution !

First Time In History A Sitting U.S. President Authorizes And Supports Terrorism On American Soil

BREAKING: GOODLATTE, MCCALL DEMAND PRESIDENT OBAMA RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION, Abandon Unilateral Plan To Move On Immigration

REPUBLICANS CAN STOP EXECUTIVE ORDER AMNESTY DEAD

‘OPEN REBELLION’: CHAOS IF REPUBLICANS DON’T WITHHOLD FUNDING FOR OBAMA EXECUTIVE AMNESTY

White House hits TV networks for skipping immigration address

Schlafly: Obama could launch another Civil War

AFL-CIO forwards e-mail about Obama immigration plans to reporters by mistake


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 540
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com