[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Stephen Colbert Gets Political, Booking Supreme Court Justice, UN Secretary-General, Bernie Sanders

The Fire Rises…Germany Calls for Other EU States To Take in “Refugees”

Kentucky clerk still won't issue same-sex marriage licenses

Atlanta cop critically wounded, a homeowner shot and dog killed in shootout after police 'went to the wrong address to investigate burglary'

If Conservatives think YouÂ’re Liberal and Liberals think YouÂ’re Conservative, You are Doing it Right

Pope tells priests to pardon women who have abortions

Poll: 71% of Americans unhappy with country's direction

Should Libertarians Vote Republican?

Why the Supreme Court is not Supreme

DC District Court Rules Pro-Life Group Cannot Be Mandated To Provide Birth Control

State Department says 150 more Hillary Clinton emails have been 'upgraded' to classified status in the release scheduled for tonigh

Armed Black Panthers to Texas Cops: ‘We Will Start Creeping Up on You in the Darkness’

Can I sue somebody for this?

Economics 102: WalMart Cuts Worker Hours After Hiking Minimum Wages

Ben Carson, Donald Trump at 23% each show “most Iowa Republicans prefer someone without a traditional political pedigree,”

One Question the Media Refuses to Ask Donald Trump

Donald Trump comes to The Barclays and all hell breaks loose

Video Shows UNARMED Man With Hands Up Right Before Cops Shoot and Kill Him

Professors threaten bad grades for saying ‘illegal alien,’ ‘male,’ ‘female’

The TRUMP Fight Song [unofficial] - TRUMP 2016

Donald Trump: U.S. Treats Illegals Better than Vets

Who is Donald Trump and what does he really stand for?

I hope he lives long enough and the trial is open enough so that we know WHY.

Exclusive — ‘Stump for Trump’ Girls: Trump’s ‘Immigration Proposal Is Phenomenal’

The 'Birmingham Koran' fragment that could shake Islam after carbon-dating suggests it is OLDER than the Prophet Muhammad

White House says Mount McKinley to be renamed Denali

On a plate

Injured Man Comes To Jail Lobby Asking Cops For Help, But Deputies Pile On Him and Kill Him Instead

Police Raid Man’s Home WITHOUT A WARRANT After He Criticized Them On Facebook

Rally for state secession falls flat

Confederate flag snapped in two at a high school football game

Police kill bystander when New York undercover gun buy goes bad

Jeb! Libertarian Veins

Donald Trump on George W. Bush's 'best moment'

Christie: Clinton caught lawlessness 'disease' from Obama White House

Democratic primary suddenly seems less certain

Christie: Track immigrants the way FedEx tracks packages

WaPo Fails to Identify ‘Close’ Clinton Adviser Used in Ignatius Column to Clear Hillary in Email Scandal

Ben Carson Edging Close to Front-Runner Trump in Latest Iowa Poll

Bruce Jenner Wants to Meet a Guy Who Treats Him ‘Like a Normal Woman’

A summer of Clinton stumbles gives way to an uncertain fall for Democrats

Spanish-Language Journalists Call Donald Trump ‘Hitler,’ ‘Monkey’

The Case of the MH370 Wing Segment Keeps Getting Weirder

Alex Jones’ Message to Rand Paul (Rant!)

SWAT Team Raids Home, Kills Man Over $2 Worth of Pot – Informant Exposes Police Cover-Up

Cop Slams Mom’s Face to the Ground Over Tinted Plate Cover as She Dropped Her Kids Off at School

Oath Keepers and Tea Partiers want to turn upstate New York into ‘New Amsterdam’

Maryland Man Fined $50 for Picking Berries in Park

The Gift of Fear

Mental Health and the 2nd Amendment


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1168
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com