[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Fighting for the falsely accused

Pat Buchanan: Is Secession a Solution to Cultural War?

Abortionist Willie Parker Aborts Up to 45 Babies a Day and Claims to be a Christian

Norma McCorvey, Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade, Passes Away: She Never Had an Abortion and Became Pro-Life

When the Beatles Brought Psychedelia to Prime Time

Fox News Channel's Alan Colmes Dies at Age 66

North Korea Mocks China for ‘Dancing to U.S. Tune’

The 20 ‘Worst’ Public Schools in America

GOOGLE blacklists Natural News...removes 140,000 pages from its index...

John McCain Makes Secret Trip to Syria in Midst of U.S. Assessment

4th Circuit Upholds Maryland's 'Assault Weapon' Ban

Supreme Court Hears Case on Fatal Border Shooting

“Show Me Your P***y” Pervert Cop Recorded Sexually Assaulting a Woman & Keeps His Job

“Show Me Your P***y” Pervert Cop Recorded Sexually Assaulting a Woman & Keeps His Job

MAINSTREAM JOURNALIST LIZ CROKIN THREATENED FOR EXPOSING CLINTON CORRUPTION, PIZZAGATE & PEDOGATE

Court To Cop: You Took 80 Days Away From A Person's Life With A Baseless Warrant, So We're Taking Your Immunity

Rep. Sensenbrenner Thinks We Can Pay For The Border Wall With More Asset Forfeiture

Why Do “Progressives” Like War?

“Sleeper cell” Obama running shadow government op to discredit Natural News and other pro-Trump independent media

The Illusion of Freedom: The Police State Is Alive and Well

New White House memo will “unshackle” DHS and Border Patrol agents

The Cost of a Border Wall vs. the Cost of Illegal Immigration

Does Pizza Hut Spokesman George Takei Advocate Pedophilia?

The Truth About Sweden

Illegal Alien Released By Sanctuary City Now Charged With Murder

MLB approves major change to intentional walk rule

Congressional Republicans Flail and Fail (can't quit loving ObamaCare, illegal aliens, global thievery & skulduggery)

WOLF! WOLF!

White House Fingers John McCain As Media Leak

War Party, Media Trying To Stop Trump-Putin Detente

Huge Immigrant Riots Break Out In Perfectly Safe Sweden

Le Pen refuses headscarf, nixes talks with Lebanon cleric

The Left-Right Paradigm Is Back

Reality Check

In powerful speech, San Diego bishop challenges organizers to disrupt, rebuild ("protagonistas")

Milo Yiannopoulos defends pedophilia and pedophiles.

Facial hair cost possible Trump hire (Bolton) his job claims 'associate' who says president-elect does not like mustaches or beards

Democrats Invoke 25th Amendment, Question Trump’s Mental Health

Florida teen makes special teddy bear to honor fallen officer

The Spooks And The Hacks: Why Do They Hate Russia?

Sheriff Tries to Expose List of 300 Bad Cops, Courts & Union Promptly Block Him

Trump Gets Ready to Pick John Bolton as Advisor

BREAKING : Make France Great Again! Le Pen SOARS in French Polls

BREAKING : Another Trump Promise Kept! 10k New Immigration Officers Coming Soon!

‘PESD’ Is PTSD For Dems Who Can’t Stop Crying Over The Election

Nearly 2 million non-citizen Hispanics illegally registered to vote

New Ping list,2020 The Likely Suspects

Court docs: Dentist had several drinks at his office before hit and run that injured teen

BREAKING VIDEO : Kasich Joins McCain in Defending Liberal FAKE NEWS Media

From auction block to handcuffs: How a local couple was jailed after a legal purchase


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1524
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com