[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Afghanistan: The Making of a Narco State

The One Trillion Dollar War - Nothing To Show For It

EXCLUSIVE: Bill Clinton bombed Saddam to distract from the Monica Lewinsky scandal - what Huma Abedin's Muslim journal claimed about her boss's husband

Maine Gov. Paul LePage leaves obscene voicemail, talks of shooting lawmaker

Report: All Of The “KKK Members” In Hillary Clinton’s New Trump Attack Ad Are PAID ACTORS

Trump's big immigration reversal shaped by Christie, Giuliani says

Obama on national deficit: I didn’t build that

Hillary Clinton has an accomplishment.

Sarah Palin Warns of ‘Massive Disappointment’ if Donald Trump Eases Immigration Policy

Clinton hits new roadblocks in campaign for White House

The crazy, conspiratorial, paranoid world of Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton: The pioneer of the Alt-Left

CNN Cancels Dr. Drew's Show One Week After He Voiced "Grave Concern" For Hillary's Health

Mom Arrested for Leaving Kids Alone in the House While She Went Out for Food

Hillary Clinton Pegged as ‘Islam’s Whore’ and Check Out NY Post’s OMG Cigar Cover (Selling America)

Obama’s Legacy: A More Vulnerable America

Assassination attempt on Angela Merkel

Hillary Clinton needs a stool step to get in & out of her car

Flashback: Democrat Attorney and Clinton Campaign Manager on Voter Registration Laws: “Whatever You Can Get Away With, Just Do It!”

C*cks Not Glocks: Univ. of Texas Austin Students Protest Gun Law with Open Dildo Carry (Poster Banned From FR)

Philippines steps up the rage

Any Truth?

Trump vs. Hillary: A Summation

Just Banned From Free Republic For Posting This Article

Target bathroom boycott is costing the company $20million and shopper traffic is down for the first time in years

Court Orders New Clinton Email Production by September 13

Jeb Bush rips 'morphing,' 'abhorrent' Trump on immigration

Eric Cantor 'pleased' Trump is embracing Jeb Bush's immigration plan

How Hillary Clinton crushed another rally in biotech

Man Calls 911 to Report His Wife Being Robbed, Cops Show Up and Shoot Him — Robber Gets Away

18 Government Agents Used Terrorism as an Excuse to Terrorize This 9-Year-Old With Pacemaker

Flashback: Hillary Clinton Praises ‘Friend and Mentor’ Robert Byrd (a KKK Recruiter)

Clinton ad ties Trump to KKK, white supremacists

Dopers Meet Reality - U.S. v. Walsh. 6th Cir. (29 Jun 2016

Trump Supporters Were Warned He’s A Fraud; They Did Not Listen And Now The Chickens Are Roosting

Three-day workweek is the most productive for employees

Four Iran Ships "Harassed" US Destroyer, Carried Out "High Speed Intercept" In Strait Of Hormuz

Republican Meg Whitman Puts Eye-Popping Cash Donation Behind Her Endorsement of Hillary Clinton

Trump says he's open to 'softening' immigration laws in 'Hannity' town hall

Clinton address Thursday will hammer Trump for connections to racist 'alt-right' movement

Ann Coulter: If Clinton wins, there's 'no hope' for GOP future

A Doctor's Take on Pot

Most Homophobes Are Actually a Lil’ Bit Gay, According to Latest Study

The Film VAXXED Could Be Outlawed In California, If This Bill Passes…

Trump Used Campaign Donations to Buy $55,000 of His Own Book

New revelations show a nation for sale under Hillary Clinton

What kind of necktie knot do you like?

My interview with Investigative Reporter Greg Ciola

Massive price increases on EpiPens raise alarm

Libertarian Elected Mayor of South Africa’s Largest City


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1441
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com