[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Fort Hood jihadist shooter Nidal Hassan is ‘gay’ and wants a sex-change operation

Merkel: Yeah, I guess we should spend that extra money on defense after all

Exclusive — President Trump Previews Congressional Address and Pathway on Obamacare Repeal, Tax Cuts, Border Wall

Bush daughter headlines Planned Parenthood fundraiser (Barbara Pierce Bush)

Has anybody else had or heard of this kind of sleep pattern?

Yes, I’m a Nazi. And how are you?

Stockman: "After March 15 Everything Will Grind To A Halt"

Is Gun Ownership a Right?

Trump's budget will slash EPA funding and other agencies to pay for massive military expansion – but won't cut Social Security or Medicare

JEFF SESSIONS Investigate this guys death

Andrew Breitbart Explains the Evil of the Democrats

Ex-congregants reveal years of ungodly abuse

Retail Apocalypse 2017

MSNBC 'Its Our Job To Control What People Think'

Former Iran President "the contemporary U.S. belongs to all nations."

Univision’s Jorge Ramos Tells Latinos America Is “Our Country, Not Theirs”

Morning Joe sings Ode To Trump, peace love and understanding

Performance Art Gone Awry Raises a Big Stink at AvantGarden

Where did Steve Bannon get his worldview? From my book.

14 Facts You May Not Know About Johnny Carson

Bill Paxton Dead at 61 Due to Complications from Surgery

House Democrats plan to troll Trump at big speech

Executive Order watch: the regulatory reform agenda

An alarming 66 per cent of Germans are afraid they will become the victim of a terrorist attack

Trump won’t go to White House Correspondents Association Dinner this year

Trump won’t go to White House Correspondents Association Dinner this year

Northern Calif. counties buck state's ‘sanctuary’ trend

Pope cuts penalties for paedophile priests - including one let off with just a lifetime of prayer for abusing five young boys

Al Gore has sold more than $37 million worth of Apple stock in February

Trump supporters wave Russian flags at CPAC (MRGA)

T’S HAPPENING: DHS Announces Contracts For Border Wall By Mid-April

Most Utah young adults ill-prepared for workforce, ineligible for military

Man In Chimp Suit Goes Wild In Tokyo Zoo, Taken Down By Tranquilizer Dart (Video)

Transgender boy wins in first round of girls tournament

Alan Dershowitz: Why I Will Leave Democratic Party If Keith Ellison Is Elected DNC Chairman

White House bars several media outlets from press conference

Why therapists are having such a hard time talking about Trump

Trump to spare U.S. 'dreamer' immigrants from crackdown (Amnesty)

The popularity of Starbucks has plunged since they decided to take on politics

Ginsburg offers praise for...Neil Gorsuch?

Bannon says Trump’s Cabinet of billionaires is “selected for a reason . . . deconstruction”

Most Republicans Oppose Federal Interference With Marijuana Legalization

Pot-Shop Cop Reinstatement Gives Police Black Eye

Strangle the Bastard Child of Prohibition: Abolish the ATF!

Fighting for the falsely accused

Pat Buchanan: Is Secession a Solution to Cultural War?

Abortionist Willie Parker Aborts Up to 45 Babies a Day and Claims to be a Christian

Norma McCorvey, Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade, Passes Away: She Never Had an Abortion and Became Pro-Life

When the Beatles Brought Psychedelia to Prime Time

Fox News Channel's Alan Colmes Dies at Age 66


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1525
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com