[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Halt called in Syria

Worker who pulled gun to stop stabbing attack at GM Tech Center says he was fired

Harry Reid on Dem Superdelgate System: Wrong to Rely on High White Populations of Iowa, New Hampshire

Car theft ends in beating of teen suspect; photos of boy spark debate

Notes After New Hampshire

New Jersey Man Slays Child–The Christie/Rubio Debate Takedown

America Trumped

The libertarian case for Kasich

The Disturbing Evolution of SWAT Teams in American Cinema

NYPD Cop Who Retired With Knee Injury, $66G Pension Regularly Runs Triathlons

EPA Rule To Ban Car Modification

Warning: The dirty tricks are about to start [in South Carolina]

'7,000 retweets and I'll smash this b****'s computer': Outrage at student who publicly threatened classmate over Trump sticker

Reagan’s populist lessons for tea-partyers

Is Cruz the frontrunner now?

Group Therapy Session at the Institute for the Politically Insane

Trump Baja venture leaves buyers high and dry

Not a Dime’s Worth of Difference

Cliven Bundy arrested (Portland Airport - PDX) by FBI, jailed in Multnomah County

Oregon Standoff Heats Up

80,000 Ineligible ACA Enrollees Cost Minnesota Millions [also AR/NE/NY/OH/IL/PA/MA fraud]

and now to more important things

New Trump ad on Ted Cruz "What kind of man" released in South Carolina

Carly Fiorina: I suspend my candidacy today

Houston Couple Forced Nanny Into ‘Slavery’

TSA: Thousands Of Illegal Aviation Workers (73 Of Them “Terrorism-Related”) Make For A “Total Security Abyss”

Bloomberg vs. Trump? “Run, Mike, Run!”

Montana Judge Refuses To Convict Anyone of Marijuana Possession

Creepy Business – Ted Cruz Father: My Son “Annointed” To “Take Control of Society”..

‘Really Honorable’: Why Jeb Bush Is Still Running - family sucide mission against Trump

New “Traffic Violations Agency” Brings Buffalo Extortion Racket To All Time High

Hillary Clinton gets stomped in NH yet still gets as many of the State's delegates

It’s on: New Cruz ad ridicules Trump as fake Republican

Maine required healthy, childless food stamp recipients to work, and...

Supreme Court Puts Hold on Obama’s Green Power Plan

It’s A Revolution: Donald Trump More Than Doubles the Competition in New Hampshire

Ted Nugent Criticized From All Sides For Anti-Semitic Facebook Post

Prosecutor Sent Innocent Man to Death Row. Now, Payback

Why is Milwaukee so bad for black people?

Federal Court Says North Carolina’s Racially Motivated Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

BREAKING NEWS: Trump claims victory in New Hampshire with a third of the vote in early counting

NH: Cruz, Kasich, Trump tied at 24.3% with 1% reporting

The Great Prentender

EXCLUSIVE– Donald J. Trump First Candidate to Reply to the ‘Sessions Test’

Supermom puts kids to bed

Ted Cruz's National Security Advisor Has Zero National Security Experience

#RobotRubio (Trump supporter) Gets Manhandled By Team Marco (VIDEO)

AT&T fights to keep your internet as slow as possible

Your Old USB Flash Drive Could Help Fight North Korean Repression

Government Agents Hunt Woman Down After Seeing Facebook Picture Of Her Rehabilitating Baby Squirrels


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1323
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com