[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kerry: Air conditioners as big a threat as ISIS

DC GOP Vice-Chair Resigns Over Trump Nomination, Plans to Vote for Gary Johnson

7* Authoritarian Lines in Donald Trump’s Speech

Half Of TSA's 30,000 Employees Accused Of Misconduct; Nearly A Third Multiple Times

We Have a "Duty" to Submit; They Have No Duty to Protect

Instead of fighting Hillary, tRump rehashes his past stupidities

Liars: Cruz, Bush, Kasich Do Not Endorse Trump, Hillary’s Mentor is Communist, Phony Economy Updat

Hillary Clinton picks Tim Kaine for VP

Italian Restaurant Trolls BLM With 'Black Olives Matter' Billboard, Sees Spike in Sales

Child recovering after pitbull attack

Utah Delegates Still Not Sold on Donald Trump, May Vote for Gary Johnson

Public pay phones -- When is the last time you used one or even saw one?

Respect and Obey Authority (Rom. 13, DHS Canary Youths)

London paper reported the ... muzz was suffering from schizophrenia --- so what's new here,

GERMANY GUN RAMPAGE SIX dead after multiple gunmen target Munich shoppers

The O’Jays slam Donald Trump and use of song ‘Love Train’ during Republican National Convention

The Presidents view of ordinary people

The Real Reason Pharma Companies Hate Medical Marijuana (It Works)

Anonymous DOJ Sources: 4 FBI Agents May Be Indicted for LaVoy Finicum’s Murder

Narcocracy

Hillary Clinton's nomination speech leaked?

Police kill family dog at child's birthday party

Law & Order Is Good (Let’s apply it to cops)

Ted Cruz and the Trump Takeover

Here’s a Leaked Draft of Trump’s RNC Speech

How the human body would have to be built to survive a catastrophic car crash: Sculptor creates 'super human' with massive head, extra nipples and no neck to launch road safety campaign

Transcript of Cruz address to convention

Cruz Denied Entry Into Sheldon Adelson’s Suite Following RNC Speech

Trump Planning To Just Let Mike Pence Run The Country

China vows to use market forces to boost defense capabilities

"Why do Republicans Respect Marijuana Prohibition Like it Came From Moses?"

Police shoot unarmed black therapist lying flat on his back with his arms in the air while he tried to calm his autistic patient and BEGGED cops not to open fire

Learning What It’s Like To Be A Serf

No Trump endorsement from Cruz; 'vote your conscience' (Clint Eastwood rerun)

Anybody watch Cruz Speech - Impressions

Erdogan Declares 3-Month State of Emergency

GOP Platform Calls for Multiple Amendments to the Constitution (Retrofit - BandAids)

In Cleveland, sea of white reflects GOP's math problem

Massachusetts Attorney General Issues ‘Directive’ To Gun Makers, Sellers: No More ‘Assault Weapons’

Trump camp offered to make Kasich 'most powerful VP in history'

Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson on way to Cleveland for RNC

Benghazi Mom Condemns Hillary–Why Doesn’t The MSM Grant HER “Absolute Moral Authority”?

America Demands Law & Order: Trump Has Thumbs On Evil Party’s Windpipe (If RATS Don’t Stab Him In The Back)

‘You Don’t Have to Wear a Military Uniform to Serve Your Country’

Roger Ailes built the Republican party – now both are crumbling in plain sight

Official 9/11 Narrative on Life Support

Refusing a search is a right, not a provocation (This is just incredible)

LOWLIGHTS CAN BE HIGHLIGHTS

The NRA Accidentally Made A Great Case for Gun Control at the Republican Convention

Violence Against Law Enforcement on the Rise


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1419
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

news.yahoo.com/federal-ju...-amendment-233222966.html

Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com