[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The Gog Of Turkey “Erdogan” Threatens The Crusader Of Russia “Putin” (The Tension Between Russia And Turkey Is Escalating)

Denmark moves toward nationalism in face of migrant crisis [Danish Nazi rampage]

Hmmm… some people seem pretty upset that The Donald isn’t spending all his money

Connecticut firm backed up Clinton’s server, might still have personal emails

Matt Drudge Visits the Alex Jones Show: Full Interview

‘Neutralizing’ John Lennon: One Man Against the ‘Monster’

Dashcam Refutes Cop’s Story of “Fearing for His Life,” Shows Him Taser Man for Parking Ticket

Woman Called 9-1-1 to Report Stolen Wallet, Crazed Cop Showed Up and Beat Her Unconscious

U Penn Professor Calls Ben Carson ‘Coon of the Year’ on Twitter


The Great Replacement: The 1965 Immigration Act And The Think Tanks

Thanks, Ted–Pre-1965 America Really NEEDED That

Clinton Calls for “Open Borders to All”–Bill Clinton’s September 10, 2001 Australia Speech

Asylees in Germany Expected to Bring in 4 to 8 Family Members

America’s Senator Jeff Sessions Says Stop to Mega Immigration-Population Growth

Bernie Sanders Explains Social Security

Trump campaign trolls Rubio with bottled water delivery Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/donald-trump-bottled-water-marco-rubio-214455#ixzz3nnufOSxo

Minnesota Tries Expensive Social Programs to Cool Jihad Ardor among Somali Immigrants

Marijuana is Bringing in Record Tax Cash for Colorado

"We Lost Our Daughter to a Mass Shooter and Now Owe $203,000 to His Ammo Dealer" And?

Conservative Values

Five things to know about House speaker hopeful Jason Chaffetz

Lawsuit: Pork roll company fired employee for farting


No votes cast in small-town Iowa school board race

The Shocking Reality: This Chart Shows Just How Bad Unemployment Is Today Compared to The Great Depression

Instead of “What would Jesus do?” how about

Valencia Woman Files Suit Alleging She Was Punched By Police In Front Of Her Kids


War Party Targets Putin and Assad

Putin has sent the feared Spetsnaz special forces into Syria to bail out Assad

Boy, 11, Reportedly Shoots Dead 8-Year-Old Neighbor After She Said He Couldn't See Her Puppy

Gay Priest Tries to Bully Church into Approving Homosexual Relations

Number One with a Bullet

McCarthy v. Chaffetz on Immigration

Dunkin’ Donuts employee writes ‘#blacklivesmatter’ on Providence police officer’s cup

White Americans are the biggest terror threat in the United States

Letter: Put all gun owners in a well-regulated militia

Rise of the ROBOSEXUALS: Humans will have virtual reality sex by 2030

Woman who sat in McDonald’s for 24 hours was actually dead

Anybody watch the Mrs Bubba Show on NBC this morning?

25 Things Generation Xers (and Baby Boomers) Did as Kids that Could Get Today’s Kids Arrested

San Francisco's last gun store closing doors for good

Hillary has long history of beating up Bill behind closed doors: book

Egypt backs Russian airstrikes in Syria

Syria: Chinese Uyghurs Killing Russian Spies According to Turkey's Plan

Caitlyn Jenner Claims She No Longer Feels Like A Woman And Asks Everyone To Call Her Bruce Again

China To Join Russian Air Strikes In Syria, Russia Gains Iraq Air Base – Report

Donald Trump After Cage Death Match With Barack Obama

Russia Intensifies Syria Bombing as Cameron Joins Criticism

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: ***BREAKING*** Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge (NDAA)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012- ... blocked-by-new-york-judge.html
Published: May 16, 2012
Author: Bob Van Voris and Patricia Hurtado
Post Date: 2012-05-16 20:01:35 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 1236
Comments: 2

A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a part of the National Defense Authorization Act that opponents claim could subject them to indefinite military detention for activities including news reporting and political activism.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

The complaint was filed Jan. 13 by a group including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges. The plaintiffs contend a section of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S., such as al-Qaeda.

“The statute at issue places the public at undue risk of having their speech chilled for the purported protection from al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and ‘associated forces’ - i.e., ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’” Forrest said in an opinion today. “The vagueness of Section 1021 does not allow the average citizen, or even the government itself, to understand with the type of definiteness to which our citizens are entitled, or what conduct comes within its scope.”

Enforcement Blocked Forrest’s order prevents enforcement of the provision of the statute pending further order of the court or an amendment to the statute by Congress.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan, declined to comment on the ruling.

The plaintiffs claim Section 1021 is vague and can be read to authorize their detention based on speech and associations that are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Hedges and two other plaintiffs testified in a hearing before Forrest in March, the judge said. A fourth plaintiff submitted a sworn declaration. The government put on no evidence, Forrest said.

Forrest, an Obama appointee who has served on the Manhattan federal court since October, rejected the government’s arguments that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue over the law and that it merely reaffirmed provisions in an earlier law, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which was passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Plaintiffs’ Activities In her opinion, Forrest said the government declined to say that the activities of Hedges and the other defendants don’t fall under the provision. Forrest held a hearing in March at which government lawyers didn’t call any witnesses or present evidence, according to the judge. The government did cross- examine the plaintiffs who testified and submitted legal arguments.

“The government was given a number of opportunities at the hearing and in its briefs to state unambiguously that the type of expressive and associational activities engaged in by plaintiffs -- or others -- are not within Section 1021,” Forrest said. “It did not. This court therefore must credit the chilling impact on First Amendment rights as reasonable -- and real.”

Hedges, who testified he has been a foreign news correspondent for 20 years, said he has reported on 17 groups that are on a State Department list of terrorist groups. Hedges testified that after the law was passed, he changed his dealings with groups he had reported on, Forrest said.

“I think the ruling was not only correct, but courageous and important,” Hedges said in a telephone interview today.

The case is Hedges v. Obama, 12-CV-00331, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court at phurtado@bloomberg.net.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest in Manhattan today ruled in favor of a group of writers and activists who sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and the Defense Department, claiming a provision of the act, signed into law Dec. 31, puts them in fear that they could be arrested and held by U.S. armed forces.

But the REAL issue is with a CONGRESS that presented the legislation for enactment.

Doesn't anyone here realize that a STUPID, BUNGLING PRESIDENT didn't make this SHIT up? It was all CONGRESS.

buckeroo  posted on  2012-05-16   20:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)


Same story but with a few more details from the judge, etc.

SJN  posted on  2012-05-17   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com