[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Fort Hood jihadist shooter Nidal Hassan is ‘gay’ and wants a sex-change operation

Merkel: Yeah, I guess we should spend that extra money on defense after all

Exclusive — President Trump Previews Congressional Address and Pathway on Obamacare Repeal, Tax Cuts, Border Wall

Bush daughter headlines Planned Parenthood fundraiser (Barbara Pierce Bush)

Has anybody else had or heard of this kind of sleep pattern?

Yes, I’m a Nazi. And how are you?

Stockman: "After March 15 Everything Will Grind To A Halt"

Is Gun Ownership a Right?

Trump's budget will slash EPA funding and other agencies to pay for massive military expansion – but won't cut Social Security or Medicare

JEFF SESSIONS Investigate this guys death

Andrew Breitbart Explains the Evil of the Democrats

Ex-congregants reveal years of ungodly abuse

Retail Apocalypse 2017

MSNBC 'Its Our Job To Control What People Think'

Former Iran President "the contemporary U.S. belongs to all nations."

Univision’s Jorge Ramos Tells Latinos America Is “Our Country, Not Theirs”

Morning Joe sings Ode To Trump, peace love and understanding

Performance Art Gone Awry Raises a Big Stink at AvantGarden

Where did Steve Bannon get his worldview? From my book.

14 Facts You May Not Know About Johnny Carson

Bill Paxton Dead at 61 Due to Complications from Surgery

House Democrats plan to troll Trump at big speech

Executive Order watch: the regulatory reform agenda

An alarming 66 per cent of Germans are afraid they will become the victim of a terrorist attack

Trump won’t go to White House Correspondents Association Dinner this year

Trump won’t go to White House Correspondents Association Dinner this year

Northern Calif. counties buck state's ‘sanctuary’ trend

Pope cuts penalties for paedophile priests - including one let off with just a lifetime of prayer for abusing five young boys

Al Gore has sold more than $37 million worth of Apple stock in February

Trump supporters wave Russian flags at CPAC (MRGA)

T’S HAPPENING: DHS Announces Contracts For Border Wall By Mid-April

Most Utah young adults ill-prepared for workforce, ineligible for military

Man In Chimp Suit Goes Wild In Tokyo Zoo, Taken Down By Tranquilizer Dart (Video)

Transgender boy wins in first round of girls tournament

Alan Dershowitz: Why I Will Leave Democratic Party If Keith Ellison Is Elected DNC Chairman

White House bars several media outlets from press conference

Why therapists are having such a hard time talking about Trump

Trump to spare U.S. 'dreamer' immigrants from crackdown (Amnesty)

The popularity of Starbucks has plunged since they decided to take on politics

Ginsburg offers praise for...Neil Gorsuch?

Bannon says Trump’s Cabinet of billionaires is “selected for a reason . . . deconstruction”

Most Republicans Oppose Federal Interference With Marijuana Legalization

Pot-Shop Cop Reinstatement Gives Police Black Eye

Strangle the Bastard Child of Prohibition: Abolish the ATF!

Fighting for the falsely accused

Pat Buchanan: Is Secession a Solution to Cultural War?

Abortionist Willie Parker Aborts Up to 45 Babies a Day and Claims to be a Christian

Norma McCorvey, Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade, Passes Away: She Never Had an Abortion and Became Pro-Life

When the Beatles Brought Psychedelia to Prime Time

Fox News Channel's Alan Colmes Dies at Age 66


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Buchanan: A Decade Of War -- For What?
Source: Human Events
URL Source: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51281
Published: May 4, 2012
Author: Patrick J Buchanan
Post Date: 2012-05-04 12:28:05 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 799
Comments: 2

"My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war," said Barack Obama from Bagram Air Base.

"Here in the predawn darkness, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq War is over. The number of troops in harm's way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home. ... The time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end."

Interesting comment, that last.

If "the time of war" is at an end, does that rule out U.S. military action in Syria or war on Iran?

Setting aside the 14,000-mile round trip to Afghanistan to do an end zone dance on the anniversary of Seal Team Six's dispatch of Osama bin Laden, Obama seems to have boxed in his Republican rivals.

His assurance that our wars are ending and our troops are coming home reflects the national will. And his partnership agreement with President Hamid Karzai and pledge that a U.S. force will remain to train the Afghan army and prevent al-Qaida's return inoculates him against the charge that he is cutting and running.

Yet The New York Times was disappointed.

Obama had not said how the United States is to train the Afghan army to defeat the Taliban by 2014, nor how we can get Karzai to deal with the pervasive corruption and incompetence of his government.

Nor did Obama say how we can be certain al-Qaida will not return when we depart.

The Times misses the point.

This speech was not designed to lay out a U.S. strategy for the next 12 years, but to get Barack Obama past the post in November.

And for that objective, the speech works.

No one knows what will happen when 23,000 more U.S. troops come home by Sept. 30, and all combat troops are out in 2014. The odds are that, after a "decent interval," like the one in Vietnam from 1973 to 1975, the Taliban will return to take vengeance on all who abandoned them, and Afghanistan will come again to resemble the land we invaded a decade ago.

Why is this probable?

First, because the Taliban have shown themselves to be, though fewer in number, a superior fighting force to the Afghan army. They have not needed foreigners to motivate, train, advise or lead them.

Nor have they needed foreign money to fight. Yet they have battled the best army in the world for a decade and repeatedly sacrificed their lives in suicide attacks.

How many Afghans on our side have launched suicide attacks?

Second, the Taliban are rooted in the Pashtun, the largest tribal group in Afghanistan, which constitutes half the population and is concentrated in the crucial south and east.

Third, they have a secure sanctuary in Pakistan.

Fourth, because, as we saw with the hysterical reaction to what U.S. troops thought was the routine burning of desecrated Qurans, Islam is the most powerful cultural and social force in the country. And the Taliban are the most deeply rooted in that faith.

Fifth, because nationalism is the most potent political current roiling nations from the Maghreb to Middle East to South Asia. And the Taliban have the causalities and credentials to prove they will fight forever to free their country of foreign influence.

A majority of Afghans surely wish the Taliban would not return, given the savagery of their previous rule and the desire of the Afghan people to be free to live their own lives according to their own interpretation of their faith.

Yet the Taliban have shown themselves willing to persist against huge odds, to fight and die in considerable numbers for the kind of country they wish to live in -- and the kind of regime they wish to live under.

Our allies have not remotely matched their zeal.

"A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history," said Mohandas Gandhi.

So, after a decade of war in Afghanistan, what have we accomplished, and at what cost? Some 2,000 U.S. dead, 16,000 wounded, hundreds of billions sunk, scores of thousands of Afghan dead. Al-Qaida was driven out a decade ago but is now in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, North Africa and Iraq.

The Taliban are gone from Kabul but may be coming back. And our hope of preserving what success we have had rests with Hamid Karzai.

"America has no designs beyond an end to al-Qaida safe havens," said Obama in Bagram. "Our goal is not to build a country in America's image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban."

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

The nation now seems not to think so. And the nation is right.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

But if those are our goals, had we not achieved them all by early 2002? What, then, were we fighting for -- these 10 years?

Paul Craig Roberts explains exactly what we were fighting for.

If we had to do it all over again, would we?

Hell yeah! Republicans and Democrats throughout the District of Criminals made a killing! What's a few thousand dead GI's and hundreds of thousands of "furriners?"

Fibr Dog  posted on  2012-05-04   16:30:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S (#0)

What do you think of Pat Buchanans article.

You being a Buchanan supporter don't you fee like a turn coat supporting Obama and the destruction of our nation?

Buchanan and Obama are light years apart.

A K A Stone  posted on  2012-05-04   21:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com