politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: The Ted Nugent Draft Dodger Story
Source:
Auburn Journal
URL Source: http://my.auburnjournal.com/detail/206078.html
Published: Apr 21, 2012
Author: Over_L
Post Date: 2012-04-21 21:34:43 by lucysmom
Keywords: None
Views: 33594
Comments: 68
***Warning: This article will contain some pretty ugly language and evoke some disquieting images*** Ted Nugent endorsed Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney's oldest son, Tagg, got very excited about this and posted the following via Twitter: "Ted Nugent endorsed my Dad today. Ted Nugent? How cool is that?! He joins Kid Rock as great Detroit musicians on team Mitt!" Nugent has, of course, been the center of quite a bit of attention recently for what he said about Barack Obama and Democrats at the recent NRA convention. This has been well publicized and I won't repeat that story here. Before Nugent's eruption at the NRA convention, candidate Mitt Romney had this to say: "It's been fun getting to know Ted Nugent." All Mitt Romney could say when told what Nugent had said at the NRA convention was this: "Divisive language is offensive no matter what side of the political aisle it comes from. Mitt Romney believes everyone needs to be civil." How weak! How Romneyesque! But what's interesting is that Mitt Romney sought Ted Nugent's endorsement even before the NRA convention craziness. After all, Ted Nugent is a self-confessed draft dodger. Oh, sure, he denied that he was telling the truth back in 1977 when interviewed by High Times. But his Selective Service records are consistent with what Nugent said himself. Here is the relevant portion of the interview from the October, 1977, edition of High Times as provided by a reporter who still had a copy in his archives: "High Times: How did you get out of the draft?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-16) not displayed.
.
.
.
#17. To: lucysmom (#16)
Why do you oppose any American citizen deciding for himself whether or not he wants to go to war? Do you support conscription and want government to have that power over its citizens? Or are you just throwing this hypocritical bullshit around because THIS American citizen supports a Republican?
Which REPUBLICAN do you support, We The People?
I think you already know the answer to that question. But that isn't the issue here. The issue is... would these types of attacks come if this were a Democrat conscientious objector supporting a Democrat candidate? I support a free man's right to decide for himself whether or not he wants to go to war, whether the man is a douchbag or not. And I suspect Lucysmom does too, so I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of attacking him for it just because he supports a Republican.
So character doesn't count in your world. Gotcha.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
So liberals are also capitalists and free marketeers. What's not to like?
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
So character doesn't count in your world. Gotcha. See, this is a perfect example of why I tell you that I ignore most of your posts, because they make absolutely no sense. You only prove that you have no viable argument.
Ahhh .. so you do not support a REPUBLICAN at all, correct?
You only prove that you have no viable argument. LOLOL Since when do you ignore my posts? If you like admitted pedophiles telling your party's politicos what to do, just admit it.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
I don't like Nugent, and I'm a veteran. I'm also always legal when I hunt.
I support an end to the purely volunteer military. Conscription would force the government to be more accountable about going to war. We never should of invaded Iraq, and we should listen to Ron Paul about military involvement, we can't afford the Neo Con, project Amercan force and commit to continual war around the world game plan.
I didn't say that. What are you trying to get at? If you have a point, just make it.
Now you have to change the subject in order to even have a point? And an absolutely ridiculous point at that?
I fully agree with you. The way the USA has played with an all volunteer military is based on nothing more than hiring a pile of reckless lamebrains that are nothing more than scoundrels to making a few bucks as opposed to loyalists towards the effort. In fact, the USA fully encourages illegal aliens to join the military forces in order to receive various benefits of citizenship to include voting. These wars around the planet are not necessary other than political meddling and a show of "power." It is an outrage!
I support an end to the purely volunteer military. Conscription would force the government to be more accountable about going to war. I have to say, that surprises me. We never should of invaded Iraq, and we should listen to Ron Paul about military involvement, we can't afford the Neo Con, project Amercan force and commit to continual war around the world game plan. 100% agreement here.
The only viable candidate on the political horizon is Ron Paul and I believe you support Paul too. He is NOT a REPUBLICAN. If he were a REPUBLICAN he wouldn't be kicked around as you see the shame of the REPUBLICAN PARTY choose silly socialists for their new escapade into the presidential elections.
The only viable candidate on the political horizon is Ron Paul and I believe you support Paul too. He is NOT a REPUBLICAN. If he were a REPUBLICAN he wouldn't be kicked around as you see the shame of the REPUBLICAN PARTY choose silly socialists for their new escapade into the presidential elections. The only viable candidate for me right now is Ron Paul. Unfortunately, he is not viable to the leftist RNC and the lemmings willing to follow it. We do agree here if I read your post correctly. But that's no surprise, we have agreed on many issues in the past. I'm at a loss though at the voices chiming in here in support of conscription. I cannot agree on ceding the personal freedom to decide whether or not to go to war and transferring that to government. I also fail to see how ceding that power to government would make it more accountable.
I care don't for his take on those collectives called corporations that are given their very existence by governments, having the same rights of free speech as living, breathing, individual citizens given those rights by God.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
I'll go even one further. If I had known that my governments plan in Afghanistan was to engage in endless nation building I wouldn't have supported that mission either. I wanted our forces to decimate the Taliban and al Qaeda and come home.
I've been donating money and time to Dr. Paul and I am disappointed more people don't see what good sense he makes. From the looks of things, I won't be voting in the presidential race this year. Obama fooled me once, but this won't happen again. And Mitt is just the Republican power elite's new errand boy and I am tired of GOP tools too.
We're in the same boat. I can't vote for either but I feel a duty to vote. What's a guy to do? I've considered Goode, but not sure I can vote for him either. What do you do if there simply isn't a candidate that a man can vote for in good conscience? Maybe this is why the majority doesn't vote at all.
I went back in the Army intending to stay in for 20. Going to Panama was eye opening for me. I was able to get out after my change of heart easier then most as I was a National Guardsman attached to an active army component and was at the point one gets to with an MOS the component the Army is critically short in where I was to decide to go laterally back into RA status and bite the bullet for the temporary cut in pay grade which is the worst part of that particular rite of passage, or I was to go back to my Special Forces National Guard unit to resume being a part timer. Looking back, I am at peace with myself for what I feel was the right decision to make. I don't think going to more wars was a sane thing to do. Going into the civilian contractor game would of made me good money, but I am not the sort of man who just does things based on how much cash it will get me.
To me the deal breaker for Ron Paul is his support of the Citizen's United decision. I love his foreign policy stance but since he wants to allow corporations even more power I don't see how he will prevail, especially when making war toys is so profitable.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
That does it for me too. Congress has the power to declare war - does the president have to agree?
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
I guess they can over ride his veto if they want to.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=29398&Disp=2#C2 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=29395&Disp=2#C2 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=29287&Disp=64#C61 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=28793&Disp=2#C2 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...rtNum=28486&Disp=183#C183 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=28054&Disp=75#C75 Shall I go on?
libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=29395&Disp=2#C2 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=29287&Disp=64#C61 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=28793&Disp=2#C2 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...rtNum=28486&Disp=183#C183 libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=28054&Disp=75#C75 Shall I go on? So you just proved you didn't ignore my posts. But you need to get a life as Sometimes there's just nothing left to say. Just like your posts yesterday were too immature to address.
Almost every country in the Middle East is awash in oil, and we have to side with the one that has nothing but joos. Goddamn, that was good thinkin'. Esso posted on 2012-01-13 7:37:56 ET
LMFAO! Yes, I sure did prove that, contrary to my own statement, and the evidence presented, that I don't ignore your posts. In Bizarro world. But you need to get a life as Sometimes there's just nothing left to say. And then sometimes, comments are just so fantastically stupid that one can only shake his head in amazement and move on. Just like your posts yesterday were too immature to address. You mean the ones about you self aborting from the forum? My offer is up to $60. Am I getting close to your price?
Ping to #17.
Yet, Ron Paul is the ONLY US Presidential candidate that openly discusses individual rights, liberties and freedoms for US citizens of this country. Since you don't care for Ron Paul's deep conviction of how to bring back America into GREATNESS perhaps you can share any other presidential candidate that discusses individual rights, freedoms and liberties to begin with. Feel free to openly discuss ANY presidential candidate that discusses the fundamental precepts and foundations of America as opposed to mere backyard mechanics that have a shiny smile while on a TV socialist news channel. [Actually, I want you to discuss ANY US elected officer that discusses individual rights, liberties and freedoms.]
Eff both those commie bitches. Women aren't required to sacrifice themselves to protect this country and should damn well keep their mouths shut regarding the circumstances of those who do.
Are you pimping out your grand children over the internet again? Isn't that against the law, even for drug addled liberal slags such as yourself?
Isn't that against the law, even for drug addled liberal slags such as yourself? OUCH!! ;)
"A friend will calm you down when you are angry, but a best friend will skip beside you with a baseball bat singing, "someone's gonna get it"
My offer is up to $60. Am I getting close to your price? BBBBWWWAAAAHHHHAAAAAHHHHHAAAAAHHHHHAAAA!!!! 60 bucks covers both the truck stop skanks' (lucybitch and whiningskank) "mattress time" and gets them each 20 dollar bindles of dope each to boot!!
(posting anything TO Brain Shit is pointless....rather posting derisively AT him makes sense)
Apparently it's only legal if you're a conservative.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Rush should have turned himself in..
Not a chance.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Nugent didn't sacrifice himself; according to his own account, he went to extremes to make sure he didn't. I have a problem with so-called patriots who are happy to see others sacrificed in their place while beating the drums of war - in other words, chickenhawks. Nugent is a chickenhawk.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Soaking and soiling himself with his own urine and feces to get out of the draft was a brilliant performance piece in which his deception had an element of truth to it. Nuge is a shit and a pissy little wannabe.
He's a conservative because he thinks money and "hard" work means he can ignore the rules mortals are expected to live by.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
What a man.
Anyone claiming to be an expert is selling something. I brandish my ignorance like a crucifix at vampires. Aaron Bady
Comments (58 - 68) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#18. To: We The People (#17)
#19. To: buckeroo, Lucysmom (#18)
#20. To: We The People (#19)
I support a free man's right to decide for himself whether or not he wants to go to war, whether the man is a douchbag or not.
#21. To: CZ82 (#12)
They still do and they've got their voters convinced of it too, except the voters don't realize it will be them that is enslaved "again".....
#22. To: mininggold (#20)
I support a free man's right to decide for himself whether or not he wants to go to war, whether the man is a douchbag or not.
#23. To: We The People (#19)
#24. To: We The People (#22)
See, this is a perfect example of why I tell you that I ignore most of your posts, because they make absolutely no sense.
#25. To: Thunderbird (#10)
#26. To: We The People (#17)
(Edited)
"Do you support conscription and want government to have that power over its citizens?"
#27. To: buckeroo (#23)
Ahhh .. so you do not support a REPUBLICAN at all, correct?
#28. To: mininggold (#24)
If you like admitted pedophiles telling your party's politicos what to do, just admit it.
#29. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
I support an end to the purely volunteer military. Conscription would force the government to be more accountable about going to war.
#30. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
"Do you support conscription and want government to have that power over its citizens?"
#31. To: We The People (#27)
What are you trying to get at?
#32. To: buckeroo, Ferret Mike (#31)
What are you trying to get at?
#33. To: buckeroo (#31)
(Edited)
The only viable candidate on the political horizon is Ron Paul and I believe you support Paul too. He is NOT a REPUBLICAN. If he were a REPUBLICAN he wouldn't be kicked around as you see the shame of the REPUBLICAN PARTY choose silly socialists for their new escapade into the presidential elections.
#34. To: Ferret Mike (#26)
We never should of invaded Iraq
#35. To: We The People (#32)
#36. To: Ferret Mike (#35)
#37. To: We The People (#34)
(Edited)
"If I had known that my governments plan in Afghanistan was to engage in endless nation building I wouldn't have supported that mission either."
#38. To: Ferret Mike (#35)
I've been donating money and time to Dr. Paul and I am disappointed more people don't see what good sense he makes.
#39. To: mininggold (#38)
To me the deal breaker for Ron Paul is his support of the Citizen's United decision. I love his foreign policy stance but since he wants to allow corporations even more power I don't see how he will prevail, especially when making war toys is so profitable.
#40. To: lucysmom (#39)
Congress has the power to declare war - does the president have to agree?
#41. To: mininggold (#24)
LOLOL Since when do you ignore my posts?
#42. To: We The People (#41)
libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...gi?ArtNum=29398&Disp=2#C2
#43. To: mininggold (#42)
(Edited)
So you just proved you didn't ignore my posts.
#44. To: lucysmom (#39)
#45. To: mininggold (#33)
(Edited)
I care don't for his [Ron Paul] take on those collectives called corporations that are given their very existence by governments, having the same rights of free speech as living, breathing, individual citizens given those rights by God.
#46. To: A K A Stone, lucysmom (#11)
Lucysmom supports involuntary servitude. The little troll war supported it too.
#47. To: lucysmom (#14)
Are you a pedophile too?
#48. To: Thunderbird (#47)
Are you pimping out your grand children over the internet again?
#49. To: We The People (#43)
You mean the ones about you self aborting from the forum?
#50. To: Thunderbird (#47)
Isn't that against the law, even for drug addled liberal slags such as yourself?
#51. To: lucysmom (#50)
drug addled
#52. To: NewsJunky (#51)
#53. To: Thunderbird (#46)
Women aren't required to sacrifice themselves to protect this country and should damn well keep their mouths shut regarding the circumstances of those who do.
#54. To: lucysmom (#53)
#55. To: lucysmom (#53)
#56. To: Ferret Mike (#54)
Nuge is a shit and a pissy little wannabe.
#57. To: Ferret Mike (#55)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]