[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: New Ron Paul TV Ad - "The One Who Can Beat Obama"
Source: youtube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D58v4eiUuI
Published: Dec 27, 2011
Author: Ron Paul2012.com
Post Date: 2011-12-27 09:42:00 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 40346
Comments: 75

Best Ron Paul TV ad I've seen yet.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-34) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#35. To: Thunderbird (#25)

...who are you supporting?

I'll be supporting the Republican nominee against Obama, not some goofy third party challenger.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insanity

We The People  posted on  2011-12-27   13:46:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: lucysmom (#33)

* "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

That isn't racist. That is just an opinion based on how many blacks in DC commit crimes and are in jail as compared to whites or asians.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   13:48:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: lucysmom (#33)

"We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational."

That doesn't bother me. It is true.

Do you walk in bad black neighborhoods at nightime? No you don't.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   13:49:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: lucysmom (#33)

* After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

I'll have to check into this one. When did the riots end again? Beginning or end of month?

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   13:50:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: lucysmom (#33)

* One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys."

That isn't racist and may or may not be true. I don't know I wasn't there.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   13:50:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: lucysmom (#33)

* Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."

I remember that bitch. Wasn't she for legalized baby killing? I'd call her a lot worse if I had a newsletter.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   13:51:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Thunderbird, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#2)

A vote for Mitts or Newt, is a vote for Obungler. It appears that you want four more years of whining about Obummer.


"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.

Hondo68  posted on  2011-12-27   13:52:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: lucysmom (#34)

Do you support Obamas racism?

Give me some quotes.

Obama supports hiring quotas and affirmative action.

He hired holder because he was black.

He hates whites in Arizona who don't want to be victimized by invading savages from Mexico.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   13:54:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: lucysmom (#34)

"There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out, many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs. . . It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names" Barack Hussein Obama from Dreams of My Father

"I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race" Barack Hussein Obama from Dreams of My Father

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/elections/293823-racist-quotes-barack-hussein-obamas-dreams.html#ixzz1hlN8t4ZO

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   13:59:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: A K A Stone (#37)

Do you walk in bad black neighborhoods at nightime? No you don't.

I live in one of the country's wealthiest zip codes and don't walk around here at night either.

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-27   14:54:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: A K A Stone (#42)

Obama supports hiring quotas and affirmative action.

He hired holder because he was black.

He hates whites in Arizona who don't want to be victimized by invading savages from Mexico.

Umm - Stone, those aren't quotes.

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-27   14:56:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: lucysmom (#45)

Umm - Stone, those aren't quotes.

No. But they are actions. Obama is a liar so sometimes you have to look at his actions. But don't worry. The next post of mine had a couple of quotes. That you are probably responding to as I type this.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   15:01:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: A K A Stone (#46)

But they are actions. Obama is a liar so sometimes you have to look at his actions.

Wrong again; they are assumptions regarding state of mind. That kind of testimony isn't even admissible in court.

Obama supports hiring quotas and affirmative action.

As a woman old enough to remember your good old days, I support affirmative action (which applies to women as well as minorities) too.

He hired holder because he was black.

"He hired Holder" is an "action"; the rest of the sentence speaks to state of mind.

He hates whites in Arizona who don't want to be victimized by invading savages from Mexico.

Ain't no part of the above that refers to "action".

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-27   15:14:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: A K A Stone (#42)

You forgot about him defending his buddy Henry Louis Gates....

"CHANGE" you can step in..... My dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the self appointed Messiah!!! Quiz: Who made the statement "The world would be a better place if only Men were to vote?????? HINT: It was a woman!!!

CZ82  posted on  2011-12-27   17:08:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Thunderbird (#25) (Edited)

I'll be supporting the Republican nominee against Obama, not some goofy third party challenger.

Why?

Because you were also FOR the $700 billion TARP bailout?

Because you also support fingerprinting gun owners?

Because you support the individual health care mandate?

Because you supported Romney when he banned an entire class of firearms in his home state of Massachusetts?

Because you support open borders and nonexistent immigration law enforcement?

Because you support the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the recent National Defense Authorization Act?

Or is it because you're just being a good sucker Republican? Because your nominee will most likely be FOR these things, while that goofy third party challenger is against it all.

We The People  posted on  2011-12-27   17:19:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: lucysmom (#47)

As a woman old enough to remember your good old days, I support affirmative action (which applies to women as well as minorities) too.

What a loser you are.

Why should some people get privelages.

You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision.

You should be careful what you say about Martin Luther King. You could be labeled a racist.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   19:02:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: A K A Stone (#50)

What a loser you are.

Why should some people get privelages.

If I call you a loser in return, will you ban me?

You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision.

and you know that because...?

You should be careful what you say about Martin Luther King. You could be labeled a racist.

Now you're speaking for me as well as MLK? Obviously you don't need either one of us for a three-way conversation.

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-27   21:38:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: lucysmom (#51)

If I call you a loser in return, will you ban me?

You are in no danger of being banned. So go ahead and call me a loser.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:06:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: lucysmom (#51)

You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision.

and you know that because...?

If I call you a loser in return, will you ban me?

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:07:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: lucysmom (#51)

You must hate Martin Luther King. He had no such vision.

and you know that because...?

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:07:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: lucysmom (#51)

Now you're speaking for me as well as MLK? Obviously you don't need either one of us for a three-way conversation.

It was rhetorical.

A liberal I used to work for (I liked him) told me that they have actual college courses on rhetoric.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   22:09:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: A K A Stone (#54)

Maybe you would just quote the relevant passage from the speech that you feel proves your point.

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-27   23:02:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: A K A Stone (#55)

A liberal I used to work for (I liked him) told me that they have actual college courses on rhetoric.

Perhaps you should attend one.

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-27   23:18:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: lucysmom (#56)

The 40 thru 50 second mark aprox.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-27   23:21:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: lucysmom, AKA Stone (#47) (Edited)

Obama supports hiring quotas and affirmative action.

As a woman old enough to remember your good old days, I support affirmative action (which applies to women as well as minorities) too.

So why do we need affirmative action anyway?????? (Don't bother bringing up racism)... Affirmative action by nature is racist/discriminatory because you "HAVE" to hire someone "JUST" because they are a certain color or sex!!!!!!!! You might want to ask all of the college grads out there who can't get a job because of Affirmative Action how they feel about it!!!!! (Bet they tell you it sucks)....

Is it because these people aren't competent to start with and would never be hired at any other place besides McDonalds?????

Oh I know why.... "fairness"!!!!! ..... That tried and true Leftard scam for getting votes they couldn't get without bribing someone??

You know I pity the ones who are competent and were hired because of affirmative action.... nobody respects them for that very reason!!!!

Quiz of the Day: Who made the statement "The world would be a better place if only Men were to vote?????? HINT: It was a woman!!!

CZ82  posted on  2011-12-28   7:15:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: lucysmom (#47)

He hired holder because he was black.

"He hired Holder" is an "action"; the rest of the sentence speaks to state of mind.

Doesn't all that tapdancing make you tired?

Will you EVER reach a point where you say to yourself,"Self,what is the purpose of blindly supporting a party to the point where I have to even lie to myself to make justifications? At what point is party loyalty no longer worth it because any party you have to tell this many lies to continue supporting it isn't worth supporting?".

"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011

Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-12-28   9:58:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: A K A Stone (#54)

Isn't that one of the speeches were he stole most of it from someone else?

His REAL dream was "mo blonde white ho's to beat at cheaper prices!"

"It is impossible to talk reason with those who can only parrot Party Slogans." sneakypete Sept 2011

Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs,life-long Dim,and major Barry Soetoro supporter.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-12-28   10:03:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: sneakypete, lucysmom (#60)

Will you EVER reach a point where you say to yourself,"Self,what is the purpose of blindly supporting a party to the point where I have to even lie to myself to make justifications? At what point is party loyalty no longer worth it because any party you have to tell this many lies to continue supporting it isn't worth supporting?".

Hmmm... This requires moral courage, internal strength, intellectual honesty and integrity... All of which she lacks.

The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system, and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” -- Samuel Adams --

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-12-28   11:50:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Thunderbird (#49)

I'll be supporting the Republican nominee against Obama, not some goofy third party challenger.

And just what, in your opinion makes this candidate 'goofy'?

Are you willing to lay your views out, show how they differ with Paul's and discuss them?

Or is one liner insults the best you got?

We The People  posted on  2011-12-28   11:54:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Capitalist Eric, lucysmom (#62)

Hmmm... This requires moral courage, internal strength, intellectual honesty and integrity... All of which she lacks.

She should just change her views and just join with the rest of you lemmings. Now that would require real courage. LOL

"ROTFLMAO... Perfect! She longs... for someone to Teabag her. a man that squats on top of a women's face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" She aches for it"... ~~~JWpegler. Head Tea Bagger and Tea Party supporter extraordinaire, explicitly expressing his fantasies in public about other posters.

mininggold  posted on  2011-12-28   12:02:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: sneakypete (#61)

Isn't that one of the speeches were he stole most of it from someone else?

I had never heard that. But it is before my era.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-12-28   12:05:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: mininggold (#64)

You don't know what courage is. You're no more qualified to discuss the subject of courage than the efficiency of an S8W nuclear reactor.

Your words are utterly devoid of significance.

“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” -- Samuel Adams --

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-12-28   12:18:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Capitalist Eric, mininggold (#66)

Your words are utterly devoid of significance.

Says who - you?

Now that's a laugh!

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-29   11:11:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: A K A Stone (#40)

I remember that bitch. Wasn't she for legalized baby killing? I'd call her a lot worse if I had a newsletter.

That, and your other replies to post #33 leave no doubt as to where you stand on the issue.

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-29   11:16:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: A K A Stone (#1)

If Gingrich or Romney are nominated... Obama wins a second term. Conservatives will vote 3rd party or stay home, like in '08.

Gingrich is sinking like a stone, so I'll focus on Romney.

Check out some of the remarks over at FR about Romney...

1. Never in a hundred years would I vote for that abortionist/statist rat bastard Mitt Romney. Baby murdering vermin are the scum of the earth.

2. Right on Jim! Your words are Heavenly music to my listening ears.

The GOP can take a hike and go the way of the Whigs if the coven promoting and funding Romney somehow manages to get him the nomination.

3. Hussein versus Willard debate.

HUSSEIN: My government mandate is better than your government mandate.

WILLARD: No, no it’s not, Anderson tell him who’s government mandate is best.

4. The obama/romney ticket brought to US buy gold-man sacks and their homeboys.

Yes it is time for change.

5. As a proud citizen of the United States of America, my most prized possession is MY VOTE.

My vote expresses my belifs, my conscience, my principles. MY VOTE IS MY LEGAL RIGHT TO SHOW WHO I THINK IS THE RIGHT PERSON FOR THE JOB.

No damn political party is going to force some unprincipled jerk down my throat and tell me who to vote for!!!

6. If the choice in November is between Romney and Obama, I go on record here and now that I will write in Sarah Palin!

7. If Romney’s the ONE we’ve been waiting for, then the Republican party is dead to me!!

8. They can have my keyboard when they pry it from my cold dead fingers. Obama can KMA!! Romney too!! And the entire Republican establishment!!

9. I predict if Romney gets the nod, that we here at FR will align behind a third party candidate who reflects our beliefs and principles.

10. “Just one more reason not to vote for Romney under any circumstance”

Exactly my thought. The man has no principles.

Romney will hand another 4 years to Obama and I believe that is EXACTLY what the RNC wants.

We The People  posted on  2011-12-29   11:19:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: A K A Stone (#58)

The 40 thru 50 second mark aprox.

What did King say his plan for achieving his dream was?

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-29   11:25:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: lucysmom (#67)

Capitalist Eric: Your words are utterly devoid of significance.

Loonybitch: Says who - you?

Yes. My opinions are based on proveable facts. YOUR opinions are based on emotions, and if the facts happen to agree with your emotions, it's merely an interesting coincidence.

Loonybitch: Now that's a laugh!

He who laughs last, didn't get the joke. In this case, you are the joke, and you still don't get it...

“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” -- Samuel Adams --

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-12-29   11:36:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Capitalist Eric, mininggold (#71)

Yes. My opinions are based on proveable facts.

So then you've identified a real world, functioning free market?

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-29   11:47:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: We The People (#69)

Romney will hand another 4 years to Obama and I believe that is EXACTLY what the RNC wants.

Exactly so.

Since the RNC and DNC are two sides of the same corrupted coin, which side is on top makes absolutely no difference.

Both are bought and paid for...

“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” -- Samuel Adams --

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-12-29   11:58:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: lucysmom (#72)

So then you've identified a real world, functioning free market?

You really think I'm gonna' fall for your bogus questions?

If I was that stupid, I'd have to change my name to something like, oh, "lucysmom."

“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” -- Samuel Adams --

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-12-29   12:00:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Capitalist Eric (#74)

You really think I'm gonna' fall for your bogus questions?

If I was that stupid, I'd have to change my name to something like, oh, "lucysmom."

So that's a NO then.

Economics is a social phenomenon and in no way a “science”, no matter how desperately its high priests would like to have it believed otherwise. It is, instead, a branch of anthropology and the sooner that is recognized and accepted, the better off human-kind in general and the world of academic economics, in particular, shall be proximity1

We probably will see widespread civil disorder in the 1980s, as a direct result of our faltering economic system. Ron Paul

lucysmom  posted on  2011-12-29   12:32:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com