United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Occupy Wall Street Protests Full Of Useful Idiot Communists And Socialists
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Occu ... ialists/15972/0/38/38/Y/M.html
Published: Oct 6, 2011
Author: Lee Rogers
Post Date: 2011-10-06 13:19:38 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 6639
Comments: 16
It is becoming increasingly clear that the people who are taking part in the much publicized Occupy Wall Street protests are mostly a bunch of useful idiots promoting communist and socialist ideologies. Even multi-millionaire propagandist Michael Moore and a myriad of rich Hollywood celebrities have come out supporting the cause of these protests indicating that the establishment has an interest in steering the direction and outcome of what is taking place. This is one of the most obvious cases of controlled opposition that we have ever seen where the protesters are actually endorsing the collectivist ideologies that benefit the wealthy elite. Communist and socialist ideolgies when put into practice have historically done nothing but centralize power and wealth in the hands of a few people as seen in the cases of the Soviet Union and China in the 20th century. Most of these useful idiots protesters know absolutely nothing about how the global financial system works and know less than nothing about the central banking systems of the world. Central banks like the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Bank have been setup by design to implement a debt based monetary system that has been used to turn the vast majority of people into debt slaves. They create money out of nothing and then charge interest on top of the money they create out of nothing through loans. Even the United States government borrows money from this system and because of that they have to implement draconian tax schemes on the people just so they can pay back the interest on the debt. What's ironic about this whole situation is that a central banking system is in fact a major plank of the Communist Manifesto as is a graduated income tax both of which have been fully implemented in the United States for almost 100 years now. With this in mind you would think that these Communist protesters would have nothing to protest because the ideologies which they claim to be in support of have actually been in use for a very long time. Unfortunately because these people are so ignorant and stupid they have no idea that the ideologies they are promoting are the very cause of the problems they are suffering from. Even more laughable is the fact that some of these protesters are actually supporters of Barack Obama despite the fact that his 2008 presidential campaign was supported by a huge number of Wall Street insiders and Fortune 500 corporate interests. The George Soros financed MoveOn.Org political action group is said to also be getting involved in steering the protests in a direction that will undoubtedly be as favorable to the establishment as possible. Soros is a wealthy billionaire insider and an individual you would think these protesters would be against. It is laughable that the protesters don't even question the fact that their so-called movement is now being supported by an organization that is financed by somebody as closely tied into the elite as Soros is. The protesters are at least correct about one thing and that's the fact that the big banks and brokerage firms on Wall Street are certainly part of the problem. Many of these organizations in a real free market system would be out of business if it wasn't for the bailouts they received back in 2008. The only reason they are still in existence is because of their insider links to the highest levels within both the Federal Reserve System and the United States government. The fact that these organizations get multi-billion dollar bailouts is proof that we do not operate in a true free market system and is the reason why power and wealth has been centralized in the hands of fewer and fewer people. Small and medium sized business would never receive bailouts even a fraction the size of the bailouts these high profile banking interests received and this fact alone shows that we are in the midst of a predatory monopolist economic system that favors the few and not the many. It is unfortunate that these protesters are entirely off base as to what the main problem is and also entirely off base as to what the real solution to the problem is. The real problem is the phony debt based money that originates from the Federal Reserve System which allows these powerful insiders to manipulate the economy and bailout their buddies if they get in trouble. An institution that sets rules as to how money is created and dumped into the economy should be at the very center of this debate and it is laughable that these protesters don't even consider it an important issue. The real solution does not exist within collectivist ideologies but instead exsits within true free market principles and within a monetary system not based around centralized control and debt. Unfortunately, convincing these useful idiots of these principles may prove to be next to impossible.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: no gnu taxes, lucysmom (#0)
So commies and socialists are bad for pointing that out and trying to over throw this capitalist based system? The only good capitalist is the one that sold the rope to his own hanging. Swing, baby, swing!
"This is what economic policy in the West has become--a tool of the wealthy used to enrich themselves by spreading poverty among the rest of the population." Paul Craig Roberts
Even more laughable is the fact that some of these protesters are actually supporters of Barack Obama despite the fact that his 2008 presidential campaign was supported by a huge number of Wall Street insiders and Fortune 500 corporate interests. The George Soros financed MoveOn.Org political action group is said to also be getting involved in steering the protests in a direction that will undoubtedly be as favorable to the establishment as possible. Soros is a wealthy billionaire insider and an individual you would think these protesters would be against. It is laughable that the protesters don't even question the fact that their so-called movement is now being supported by an organization that is financed by somebody as closely tied into the elite as Soros is. Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
A graduated income tax existed long before Marx wrote his Manifesto... The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. A tax upon house-rents, therefore, would in general fall heaviest upon the rich; and in this sort of inequality there would not, perhaps, be anything very unreasonable. It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion. --Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations... A common contribution is essential for the maintenance of the public forces and for the cost of administration. This should be equitably distributed among all the citizens in proportion to their means. --French Declaration of Rights, 1789 Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise. --Thomas Jefferson
Stay Hungry...Stay Foolish --Steve Jobs
Adam Smith was anti-corporation as well. And just to make gnu's small head explode, Marx was pro capitalism.
"This is what economic policy in the West has become--a tool of the wealthy used to enrich themselves by spreading poverty among the rest of the population." Paul Craig Roberts
Yeah, according to Noam Chomsky. What he tended to be opposed to was State sanctioned monopolies supported by law like your hero Obama would love. Marx was pro capitalism. Another misleading statement. Marx was somewhat guarded in his criticism of capitalism, as ther were worse systems. but he was hardly pro-capitalist.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Adam Smith was against corporations because he thought the managers of corporations would be short sighted and suck the company dry because they are not self invested owners. Marx thought capitalism was one of the required stages of development in his economics theory.
"This is what economic policy in the West has become--a tool of the wealthy used to enrich themselves by spreading poverty among the rest of the population." Paul Craig Roberts
What I said. He was guarded in his criticism against it because he realized there were worse systems. He was NOT pro capitalism, though.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
What you said was meaningless. Marx said it was a NECESSARY economic system of development.
"This is what economic policy in the West has become--a tool of the wealthy used to enrich themselves by spreading poverty among the rest of the population." Paul Craig Roberts
The trading companies required large capitals to produce their monopoly profits because although they were called ‘trading companies’ of necessity they were much more than that. They took on the role of mini-states too, with their own fortified ports, trading posts, and ships. Their charters came from the King or Acts of Parliament and they were legal monopolies. The most prominent of them, aside from the share-fraud scheme of the South Sea Company (1711-1720), was the East India Company founded in 1600 and which in the next two hundred years ended up ruling all of India. All of Adam Smith’s severe criticism was centred on the East India Company, in particular, and the general notion of Chartered trading companies in general. This is confused with joint-stock companies that formed from the mid-19th century and I read accounts of modern international companies of this century and the last as if they are identical in all respects and in the same context. They are not. The capital required in the 17th and 18th centuries for chartered trading companies –ships, fortified warehouses, armies, trading goods, and wages – were not trivial. Most commercial entities were small one-man, or one-family, businesses or small partnerships, with small capitals (stocks, workers wages, crude tools, and materials). These were not protected and if one of them was in financial trouble, all the assets of the owners were pledged to clear their debts. The chartered companies were privatised instruments of British state policy – trade, colonies, exploration and conquest – and their joint-stock status was independent of the assets of shareholders, though loss of their money tied in the shares could be disastrous. Sir Isaac Newton was one of many caught by the collapse of the South Sea bubble. Most of the chartered companies were unsuccessful and useless, the facts of which Adam Smith details in Wealth Of Nations. The East India Company was also distant in its operations and local management. It took over a year to send written messages back and forth from India to London, leaving the local management in the midst of temptation to ‘trade on their own account’ which few resisted, including the lowliest clerks. Today communication is counted in seconds and the world’s media reports on what it observes. Modern managements cannot get away with bare-faced theft of company property as recent criminal cases have shown. Moreover, Adam Smith was not totally opposed to joint-stock companies. He certainly opposed them if they were granted legal monopolies. In fact he specifically approved of several examples of joint stock companies, such as the Bank of England, the Bank of Scotland, the Royal Bank of Scotland, as well as when they were instituted for ‘routine’ business such as insurance companies, major civil projects (navigable canals and water supplies). It was long after he had died in 1790 that the spread of power-driven industry and larger-scale operations required a substantial increase in their capital that joint-stock companies became the most efficient (relatively speaking) to raise such capital sums. Hence, by the later 19th century new legal versions of competitive, not monopolistic, joint-stock companies became feasible and more popular. They have been closely scrutinised by the regulators and the law ever since. ‘Information for business executives’ should not be a tendentious misreading of history and of the Works of Adam Smith; false information is less useful than the accurate kind. Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
He was NOT pro capitalist, or he would not have of the notion that further evolvement was necessary. What about that do you not understand? He wanted all capitalism to "evolve" away ASAP.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Yes. The stage which could be counted on to develop and create all the wealth from which ALL of it could be plundered in the LAST step of a Marxist dictatorship. Thanks, Commie.
"It's not surprising, then, they [White Pennsylvanians] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." ~ Comrade-in-Chief Barry Hussein 0bama
Extreme income inequality often leads to revolutions. The real purpose of the protest is to highlight income inequality and to use Wall Street as a prime example of how the system has become corrupted.
Extreme intellectual inequality ... this one is guaranteed to backfire --- the dnc schools are mass producing these idiots ! How about fema cards redeemable in mexico - kenya - disneyland ! One way out of the country airplane tickets around the time of the next elections ! The public school monopoly is a DNC criminal 666 conspiracy to perpetuate voter dependence - compliance - fraud ! The forbidden voucher system would immediately eliminate it !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons are for girlie boys !
We have had public schools for many decades and we as country haven't done that bad.
You are so thoroughly ... drugged - brainwashed --- not to even know it ! You should all reconsider christianity - conservatism !
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons are for girlie boys !
Actually "Progressives" are responsible for probably the two most pro corporation policies in human history those being permanent copyright and debt / usury based "money". Modern corporations largely thrive on the results of these two policies. Micro$oft as a forinstance is a permanent COPYRIGHT and software patent based monopoly. One thing that you "Progressives" seem to forget is that "Progressive" big government is a right wing as well as left wing philosophy. As a forinsitance Theodore Roosevelt, Benito Mussalini, Adolph Hitler and the two Bush family presidents were right wing "PROGRESSIVES". Nicholi Lennin, Joseph Stalin, and Barack Obama are left wing "PROGRESSIVES".
Most of these useful idiots protesters know absolutely nothing about how the global financial system works and know less than nothing about the central banking systems of the world. Central banks like the Federal Reserve System and the European Central Bank have been setup by design to implement a debt based monetary system that has been used to turn the vast majority of people into debt slaves.
#2. To: Godwinson (#1)
What's ironic about this whole situation is that a central banking system is in fact a major plank of the Communist Manifesto as is a graduated income tax both of which have been fully implemented in the United States for almost 100 years now. With this in mind you would think that these Communist protesters would have nothing to protest because the ideologies which they claim to be in support of have actually been in use for a very long time. Unfortunately because these people are so ignorant and stupid they have no idea that the ideologies they are promoting are the very cause of the problems they are suffering from.
#3. To: no gnu taxes (#2)
(Edited)
#4. To: war, no gnu taxes (#3)
#5. To: Godwinson (#4)
Adam Smith was anti-corporation as well.
#6. To: no gnu taxes (#5)
#7. To: Godwinson (#6)
Marx thought capitalism was one of the required stages of development in his economics theory.
#8. To: no gnu taxes (#7)
What I said. He was guarded in his criticism
#9. To: Godwinson (#6)
Adam Smith discussed the East India Company in a section he added to the 3rd edition of Wealth Of Nations and placed it in Book V, though they properly belong to Book IV where he discusses his ‘violent’ critique of mercantile political economy. (WN IV i.3: pp 731-58)
#10. To: Godwinson (#8)
#11. To: Godwinson the Commie (#6)
Marx thought capitalism was one of the required stages of development in his economics theory.
#12. To: no gnu taxes (#0)
#13. To: NewsJunky (#12)
(Edited)
Extreme income inequality often leads to revolutions.
#14. To: BorisY (#13)
#15. To: NewsJunky (#14)
(Edited)
Newsdumpsky
#16. To: no gnu taxes (#10)
(Edited)
The FARO RESERVE BANK!!! 
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]