[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles

Title: Ron Paul Rails Against Rick Santorum: ‘We Just Plain Don’t Mind Our Own Business!’
Source: Mediaite.com
URL Source: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rep-ron- ... in-dont-mind-our-own-business/
Published: Aug 12, 2011
Author: Mediaite.com
Post Date: 2011-08-12 01:18:40 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 65218
Comments: 85

The debate began with the two most similar candidates– Minnesotans Gov. Tim Pawlenty and Rep. Michele Bachmann– pulling no punches in disparaging each other’s records. It wouldn’t take long for the two most different candidates to have at it, and the foreign policy conversation between. Rep. Ron Paul and Rick Santorum delivered just as much as the experience one among the Minnesotans.

Rep. Paul brought his vintage A-game to the debate on foreign policy tonight, attacking America’s foreign policy on Iran and arguing that they were entirely justified in wanting nuclear weapons. Arguing that the USSR had nuclear weapons and “they were the greatest danger in our history,” he concluded it made no sense to stop the Iranians, who were not a threat. Oh, and by the way, “that’s why we don’t have trade relations with Cuba,” he added as an aside. “It’s about time we start talking to Cuba and stop these wars that are 30-40 years old.”

At this, Santorum shot up, interrupting Herman Cain’s question to respond as the author of the anti-Iranian bill that riled up Rep. Paul so much. “Iran is not Iceland,” he argued, noting that “Iran has killed more American men and women in uniform than the Iraqis [sic] or Afghans have.” He also added that Iran “is at war with us,” which gave Rep. Paul a comeback opening. “We started it in 1953… we installed the Shah, and the blowback came in 1979… it’s been going on because we just plain don’t mind our own business,” he shouted, to cheers.

The segment via Fox News below:

if (70 > (Math.random() * 100)) bing_spawn('Ron Paul');

- Subscribe to *Tea Party On Parade*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 75.

#4. To: Brian S (#0)

Rep. Paul brought his vintage A-game to the debate on foreign policy tonight, attacking America’s foreign policy on Iran and arguing that they were entirely justified in wanting nuclear weapons.

This is a misrepresentation of what Dr. Paul actually said. He didn't say the Iranians were justified in wanting nuclear weapons, he said the US wasn't justified in stopping them. There is a big difference.

Thunderbird  posted on  2011-08-12   9:19:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Thunderbird Brian S (#4)

This is a misrepresentation of what Dr. Paul actually said. He didn't say the Iranians were justified in wanting nuclear weapons, he said the US wasn't justified in stopping them. There is a big difference.

What did Ron Paul actually say ... he said:

Why would that be so strange if the Soviets and the Chinese had nuclear weapons, we tolerated the Soviets. We didn't attack them. And they were a much greater danger. They were the greatest danger to us in our whole history. But you don't go to war with them. Just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran. The Chinese are there. The Indians are there. The Pakistanis are there. The Israelis are there. The United States is there. All these countries ... why wouldn't it be natural if they might want a weapon? Internationally, they might be given more respect.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2011-08-12   10:46:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Gatlin (#14)

Why would that be so strange if the Soviets and the Chinese had nuclear weapons, we tolerated the Soviets. We didn't attack them. And they were a much greater danger. They were the greatest danger to us in our whole history. But you don't go to war with them. Just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran. The Chinese are there. The Indians are there. The Pakistanis are there. The Israelis are there. The United States is there. All these countries ... why wouldn't it be natural if they might want a weapon? Internationally, they might be given more respect.

He's right - the idea that the Iranians would nuke Israel is pretty silly given the likely response, and the fact that winds would blow fallout back at them. There's no evidence that the Iranians are any more suicidal than the Soviets or North Koreans.

And a desire by the Iranians to want nukes is perfectly understandable given U.S. forces on both their borders while we leave North Korea and Pakistan alone.

go65  posted on  2011-08-12   11:07:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: go65. Brian S, Thunderbird (#17)

Why would that be so strange if the Soviets and the Chinese had nuclear weapons, we tolerated the Soviets. We didn't attack them. And they were a much greater danger. They were the greatest danger to us in our whole history. But you don't go to war with them. Just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran. The Chinese are there. The Indians are there. The Pakistanis are there. The Israelis are there. The United States is there. All these countries ... why wouldn't it be natural if they might want a weapon? Internationally, they might be given more respect.

He's right - the idea that the Iranians would nuke Israel is pretty silly given the likely response, and the fact that winds would blow fallout back at them. There's no evidence that the Iranians are any more suicidal than the Soviets or North Koreans.

And a desire by the Iranians to want nukes is perfectly understandable given U.S. forces on both their borders while we leave North Korea and Pakistan alone.

The original point: Ron Paul say the Iranians are justified in wanting/having nuclear weapons?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2011-08-12   11:15:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Gatlin (#19)

The original point: Ron Paul say the Iranians are justified in wanting/having nuclear weapons?

What he's said is that it is understandable that they would want nukes, that there is no evidence they are working on nukes, and that he opposes sanctions on Iran.

go65  posted on  2011-08-12   11:26:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: go65 (#23)

What he's said is that it is understandable that they would want nukes ...

Yea, I read that ...

He surely did NOT say that is is NOT okay for them to have them, then did he mean that it's okay for them to have them?

I don't know ...

If I were to "guess" ... I would "guess" that he means that it is okay for them to have them. That is what I understood him to say ... I could be wrong.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2011-08-12   11:38:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Gatlin, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#26)

He surely did NOT say that is is NOT okay for them to have them

Yeah, Ron Paul would not even interfere with YOUR ability to defend yourself. But being a neo-progressive statist liberal, you'd like to deny others the tools to defend themselves, wouldn't you?

Hondo68  posted on  2011-08-12   11:50:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: hondo68 (#27)

... you'd like to deny others the tools to defend themselves, wouldn't you?

Nope.

I would however like to deny MUSLIM FANATICS, who continue to kill people and themselves with their suicide bombs, a nuke bomb tool ... wouldn't you?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2011-08-12   13:35:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Gatlin (#34)

I would however like to deny MUSLIM FANATICS, who continue to kill people and themselves with their suicide bombs, a nuke bomb tool ... wouldn't you?

Pakistan has one already.

And we seem to all be OK with North Korea having a nuke.

go65  posted on  2011-08-12   13:38:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: go65 (#36)

Pakistan has one already.

And we seem to all be OK with North Korea having a nuke.

So 10 to 20 more countries should have them?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2011-08-12   14:07:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Gatlin (#42)

So 10 to 20 more countries should have them?

Who are we to say who can and can't have nuclear weapons?

go65  posted on  2011-08-12   15:10:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: go65 (#47)

Who are we to say who can and can't have nuclear weapons?

'We' are a world leader and a nuclear superpower with an obligation not to destroy civilization or life on earth as we know it.

'We' also enjoy a lifestyle unparalleled in history, so count your blessings.

Thunderbird  posted on  2011-08-12   19:13:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Thunderbird (#62)

'We' are a world leader and a nuclear superpower with an obligation not to destroy civilization or life on earth as we know it.

So you think the U.S. should intervene in Sudan to stop the killing & starvation?

go65  posted on  2011-08-13   10:49:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: go65 (#72)

So you think the U.S. should intervene in Sudan to stop the killing & starvation?

Do I think current starvation and killing in Sudan while deplorable is the equivalent of a nuclear explosion?...no.

However, if there were a group of terrorists (or even the government) in Sudan plotting such an event, the United States and its allies can and should intervene.

Any other leading questions?

Thunderbird  posted on  2011-08-13   11:45:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Thunderbird (#74)

However, if there were a group of terrorists (or even the government) in Sudan plotting such an event, the United States and its allies can and should intervene.

On that we agree. If someone threatens the U.S., we should act.

Iran isn't a threat to the U.S.

go65  posted on  2011-08-13   13:55:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 75.

#77. To: go65 (#75)

On that we agree. If someone threatens the U.S., we should act. Iran isn't a threat to the U.S.

I didn't say a specific threat to the United States was necessary for intervention..only that a group or country was plotting to explode a nuclear device.

In Iran's case, their association with middle east terrorism makes their acquiring nuclear weapons capability especially problematic.

I'd say the probability of 'someone' taking out their reactor as quite high.

Thunderbird  posted on  2011-08-13 14:17:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 75.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com