Title: Welcome Nolu Chan Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Aug 11, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-08-11 17:46:58 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:398060 Comments:437
I presume you missed the part where Goldi and I have never been close
I really don't fucking care about your relationship with Sally. What is important is that nc brought up an older post that obviously shows the subterfuge that YOU, yourself present at all times and as old as that post was, it still establishes the same pattern of conduct today.
The truth is, all you little fucking jerk-offs, need to do is NOT make these forums a place for a pissing contest in the first place. I think you are envious of nc because of his consistent manner of presentation and genuine wit displaying critical thinking.
You eat his time up. He really has some good ideas to share, too.
Just as a point of fact, sometime in 2007-2008, I posted an article about 0bama's birth certificate, as at the time, it seemed strange to me that the US would permit a candidate to run for office without having the barest of presidential valid credentials as documented in the US Constitution. NC, hopped on that thread and made some excellent points and as far as I am concerned stand today as the hallmarck of reasoning about a silly issue. The guy doesn't waste his time; he researches an article or viewpoint until he is satisfied with a realistic and reasonable viewpoint that can be not only well presented but also contains ample data beyond his opinion, such as a link or just a quote for later research and validation by ANYONE.
He is impressive to me. He also doesn't run around making stuff up as some posters do ..... SUCH AS YOU, and then later can not even support those same flimsy ideas.
and there were long periods when I didn't post
I believe that. I believe you become so flustered with your own cobweb of lies that the self embarrassment and humiliation from others renders you incapable to make a post for a long time.
Okay, so we've concluded once again that you are incompetent vis-a-vis the intricacies of the internet and dismantled your absurd expose on the 'yukon affair'.
Who is we? Do you have a turd in your pocket? The collected knowledge of the gay canaries on display.
THE HARROWUP CHALLENGE: post a working link to any dot-decimal IPA address containing an octet value greater than 255.
Anyone who states that a dot decimal format IPA containing "291" could be valid displays that he doesn't know what he is talking about.
The subject IPA caused much consternation on an LP cluster foxtrot. Demonstration of yukon experts at work:
#907. To: ALL, yukon, Gatlin, 22Rifle, Internet sleuths (#906)
I'm posting the IP of the person who hacked Yukon's posting file.
95.154.230.253 password hacker (hacked yukon)
95.154.230.291
Maybe someone can find him/her. Isn't there some legal precident for filing a lawsuit for doing that? Remember someone hacked Palin's email...and I think the guy went to jail, or something bad happened to him.
IPv4 addresses are canonically represented in dot-decimal notation, which consists of four decimal numbers, each ranging from 0 to 255, separated by dots, e.g., 172.16.254.1. Each part represents a group of 8 bits (octet) of the address.
The IPA 95.154.230.291 is in classic IPv4 dot-decimal notation. It cannot be an IPv6 number.
IPv4 utilizes 4 octets. IPv6, a newer system, uses 8 octets. It is not expressed in dot-decimal but in colon-hexadecimal. IPv6 has an extra 4 octets, but any eight bits in memory cannot store more than 0-255. In hexadecimal, the numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E,F. The example IPv6 format address at the Wikipedia link is 2001:0DB8:AC10:FE01:0000:0000:0000:0000. Omitting the 4 zero groups, it can be expressed as 2001:0DB8:AC10:FE01::
NOTE: 291 is not an IPv6 value. Those come in groups of four (4) hex numbers, expressed in colon-hex notation. Leading zero values are included.
Most idiots, with Harrowup being a notable exception, can recognize 95.154.230.291 as an invalid IPv4 expression, containing an impossible octet value of 291. It is impossible to store the value 291 in 8 bits binary.
As one may observe, An IPv6 IPA is expressed in hexadecimal 4-digit numbers. It does not resemble IPv4 the three-digit dot-decimal expression of IPv4 which is, indeed, limited to 255 in each of its octets.
Computer memory is an ON/OFF condition. It always represents one of two states, a BINARY condition. A byte of data, 8 bits, can store 28, or 256 combinations. Starting with Zero, the highest number possible is 255.
Every machine on the Internet has a unique identifying number, called an IP Address. The IP stands for Internet Protocol, which is the language that computers use to communicate over the Internet. A protocol is the pre-defined way that someone who wants to use a service talks with that service. The "someone" could be a person, but more often it is a computer program like a Web browser.
A typical IP address looks like this:
216.27.61.137
To make it easier for us humans to remember, IP addresses are normally expressed in decimal format as a dotted decimal number like the one above. But computers communicate in binary form. Look at the same IP address in binary:
11011000.00011011.00111101.10001001
The four numbers in an IP address are called octets, because they each have eight positions when viewed in binary form. If you add all the positions together, you get 32, which is why IP addresses are considered 32-bit numbers. Since each of the eight positions can have two different states (1 or zero), the total number of possible combinations per octet is 28 or 256. So each octet can contain any value between zero and 255. Combine the four octets and you get 232 or a possible 4,294,967,296 unique values!
Out of the almost 4.3 billion possible combinations, certain values are restricted from use as typical IP addresses. For example, the IP address 0.0.0.0 is reserved for the default network and the address 255.255.255.255 is used for broadcasts.
The octets serve a purpose other than simply separating the numbers. They are used to create classes of IP addresses that can be assigned to a particular business, government or other entity based on size and need. The octets are split into two sections: Net and Host. The Net section always contains the first octet. It is used to identify the network that a computer belongs to. Host (sometimes referred to as Node) identifies the actual computer on the network. The Host section always contains the last octet. There are five IP classes plus certain special addresses. You can learn more about IP classes at What is an IP address?.
#399. To: calcon, buckeroo, nolu chan, Gatlin (#398)
If you have actually read any of #3 shit-bug's pointless c/p you will have discovered something known since about the summer of 1998. I enjoy pirating and laughter and despise bullies, bigots and zealots of any stripe.
Successful pirating takes at least three dedicated partners which is why in the last few years I've been downgraded to spoofing, a less clearly defined distractor simply because I've no partners.
Gatlin is of the old military school of duty honor and country and demands proof beyond any doubt that something is true or false. His ethical standards are something to be admired, but that has never stopped me from using my own military experience especially that gained in the five sided circle jerk compound of crushing opponents quickly and without concern for manners.
Gatlin chose to concentrate on yukon-LP; I preferred to declare that the real crime was here at LF where the phony yukon-LF was created by two of your closest associates previously named.
Frankly, I don't know if Gatlin agrees or not. Doesn't matter. He and I agree to disagree on many matters of state. The one thing we do agree on is that bullies, bigots, liars and frauds have no immunity from being flayed and spayed.
And that, my friend, is the end of #3's dubious conspiracy theory. Deflated, dejected and disgraced along with all of his new found and old smelling associates.
You can choose to remain spinning nowhere in that silly little cage and suffer the inevitable consequence and/or you can just not bother to demonstrate your incompetence by parroting pure unadulterated BS from the likes of mochajoke, #3 shit bug, dung beetle or for that matter, buckeroo's ghost.
#3: I have made no challenge. Never need to. You do all the damage to yourself every time you get tied up in your soiled shorts.
I worked there in the early 90s as a personnel policy analyst for about two years. On 9/11 our secretary/administrative assistant, Lisa Young, was killed in the Pentagon strike.
despise bullies, bigots and zealots of any stripe.
some serious bullshit admiral, let me clarify:
1. "I enjoy pirating and laughter and despise bullies, bigots and zealots of any stripe". you and your posse of gay geezers are the biggest bullies on the internet--you just extremely bad at it.
2."Gatlin is of the old military school of duty honor and country"--gatlin is a liar, cheat and a fraud as evidenced by his "tater" alias.
3."my own military experience especially that gained in the five sided circle jerk" - - i have no doubt that you were the pivot man on many circle jerks.
4."we do agree on is that bullies, bigots, liars and frauds have no immunity from being flayed and spayed" -- you were shown to be gutless cowards and bullies of the worst kind. That's why on every forum you're laughed at.
All and all you and gatlin/tater are the two poorest excuses for human beings I've ever encounter. You and your gay geezer posse make the harpies at FR look like saints.
In closing, let me just say EAT SHIT AND DIE, you miserable, old, sorry excuse for a man.
Notice how harrowup twisted his own words into an entirely new idea. Yet, that was one of the longest posts harrowup created on the thread and that means he took some time to write his post; nope, he was very clear about his intention and that was a method to create an illusion of his own Kloaughn act.
I suppose, based on the meaning of your own monicker that you are looking for news and opinions based on the news that might shed a new idea or understanding about the problems of the world us. And, here you are on a thread that has little to do with any of that detail. Do you want to know why we are pissed at "harrowup?" Because he doesn't add to a thread's understanding; indeed, he is contrary EVERYWHERE he goes by subtracting from any good ideas and turns the discussion into a pissing contest.
And, as you caught him; he shall quickly modify his earlier post in such a way as to show his real intention. The problem with his tendency to adjust his own posts when called on the carpet is that he does it all the time OR he skips/pretends/wishes and clicks his little red slippers as Dorothy did wanting to go home in Kansas (caricature borrowed from Wizard of Oz acclaim.)
harrowup is so full of hot aire about himself and the way he discusses ANYTHING, that he is nothing more than a Kloaughn playtoy for many of us because he bounces back with a new edition of his own ideas, just as did to you. I enjoy watching him sweat it out, too. I wager he has a browser add-on for pinging the LF channel with a 5 second frequency waiting for a post to him as he is anal retentive about this stuff.
I can't say that his "goat herding" is any more true than his apparently collapsed career of being all the other professions he claims to be, so it would be incorrect of me to assume ANYTHING he says is true based on his hot aire about his own life. At least, he could claim he is a reincarnation time after time remembering all these stories; that would be helpful and add credibility to his claims.
Honestly, I think he is in the publick soup kitchen lines day after day after day and using the free Internet access that the government affords him before he slurps down his soup and munches on the single slice of bread provided for him. harrowup is probably a victim of bumfights which could be his only claim to REAL fame.
Let me ask you a question: why on Earth would a mere poster on a chit-channel suggest ALL those professions unless he was personally attempting to add credibility (or weight) to his own opinions with the hope to persuade or influence an audience about his own opinions?
I couldn't care less about someone's background when a valid perspective is considered ON ANY SUBJECT OR TOPIC. If I see ranting and using one's own unverifiable background, I normally just brush that poster to the side until I see their same or similar tired rants as a "yukon."
These threads are supposed to be fun; the idea is make a faire and reasonable exchange of opinions and concepts in such a way that we can learn from each other. It doesn't mean that we BS or throw untruths around; if anyone is compelled to perform that indignity they have wasted their own time and those same antics catch up with them ..... harrowup took the position of challenging nc at the top of the thread (many posts before nc appeared) and look at what happened: BACKFIRE!
As always, your rhetoric continues to be so convoluted with logic so flawed that its reasoning is so shoddy and therefore makes your efforts to be desultory.
Why are your words near carbon copies of various blogs about the Middle East? Are you a Prolific Palestinian?
#420. To: harrowup, calcon, buckeroo, Gatlin (#399)
Gatlin is of the old military school of duty honor and country and demands proof beyond any doubt that something is true or false.
[boldface as in original]
EVOLVING EXPLANATIONS
To clarify the course of excuses, yukon (the real yukon, or his hacker, or whomever) FIRST floated the excuse that he simply had too many browsers open and posted the wrong link.
#3. To: Argus (#2)
This calls for banishment!
For having too many browsers open, kook?
yukon posted on 2011-03-27 2:06:27 ET
On 3/27, We The People said, "Why do you think he hasn't defended himself? I at least expected some CT about someone hacking his computer, or something! But not a word in his own defense."
On 3/28, GeorgiaConservative offered, "Something like this will likely be the made-up-on-the-fly excuse when yukon sobers up and this thread is sent to the corn field. yukon: "my computer was hacked by a 'CT' truther and here is Goldi to confirm it!"
On 3/30, I'm Back/yukon stated: "There has been a malicious attack on the site and I hope whoever is responsible is tracked down and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."
In a PM to Stone, Gatlin wrote: "Stone, yukon said the best he remembers is that the exchange where I guessed his password on the first try was in a PM on LF."
On 4/1, yukon claimed he did not use the same password on both sites.
On 4/4, Goldi wrote, "I'm posting the IP of the person who hacked Yukon's posting file. 95.154.230.253 password hacker (hacked yukon) 95.154.230.291"
On 4/10, Gatlin claimed that his "explanation is as it has been from day two ... yukon and Ibluafartsky used the same password at both LP and LF."
The posts of witless Gatlin are a smoking gun. He claimed knowledge that the same password was used on the LP yukon account and the LF Fartsky account. Unless he was privy to the passwords as a community user of those handles, he could not know the original passwords unless yukon/Fartsky revealed them, and he successfully tried them. He could not even verify his guess except via yukon/Fartsky. Unfortunately for Gatlin, on 4/1/2011 yukon had already emphatically denied that he had used the same password on the two sites. But if yukon was not the source of Gatlin's information, what was?
On 4/17, Gatlin claimed that, "If someone guesses a password and enters a computer, that is legally hacking."
On 4/18, Gatlin offered, "Yukon's old password at LP was guessed within minutes."
On 4/18, Gatlin claimed to have guessed the password at LF on the first try.
On 4/19, Harrowup offered his claim that, "Yukon's pw was stolen at LP; hacked was a term that never should have been used."
On 4/20, Gatlin posted, "Goldi guessed yukon's old password on LP within a matter of minutes. I guessed yukon/Ibluafartsky's old password on LF on the first try."
On 4/24, Gatlin wrote, "The gay link was never posted to show that yukon was a homo ... the gay link was posted to draw out and expose posters like you." Quoted here" after Gatlin deleted his original post.
Anyone who states that a dot decimal format IPA containing "291" could be valid displays that he doesn't know what he is talking about.
The subject IPA caused much consternation on an LP cluster foxtrot. Demonstration of yukon experts at work:
#907. To: ALL, yukon, Gatlin, 22Rifle, Internet sleuths (#906)
I'm posting the IP of the person who hacked Yukon's posting file.
95.154.230.253 password hacker (hacked yukon)
95.154.230.291
Maybe someone can find him/her. Isn't there some legal precident for filing a lawsuit for doing that? Remember someone hacked Palin's email...and I think the guy went to jail, or something bad happened to him.
IPv4 addresses are canonically represented in dot-decimal notation, which consists of four decimal numbers, each ranging from 0 to 255, separated by dots, e.g., 172.16.254.1. Each part represents a group of 8 bits (octet) of the address.
The IPA 95.154.230.291 is in classic IPv4 dot-decimal notation. It cannot be an IPv6 number.
IPv4 utilizes 4 octets. IPv6, a newer system, uses 8 octets. It is not expressed in dot-decimal but in colon-hexadecimal. IPv6 has an extra 4 octets, but any eight bits in memory cannot store more than 0-255. In hexadecimal, the numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E,F. The example IPv6 format address at the Wikipedia link is 2001:0DB8:AC10:FE01:0000:0000:0000:0000. Omitting the 4 zero groups, it can be expressed as 2001:0DB8:AC10:FE01::
NOTE: 291 is not an IPv6 value. Those come in groups of four (4) hex numbers, expressed in colon-hex notation. Leading zero values are included.
Most idiots, with Harrowup being a notable exception, can recognize 95.154.230.291 as an invalid IPv4 expression, containing an impossible octet value of 291. It is impossible to store the value 291 in 8 bits binary.
As one may observe, An IPv6 IPA is expressed in hexadecimal 4-digit numbers. It does not resemble IPv4 the three-digit dot-decimal expression of IPv4 which is, indeed, limited to 255 in each of its octets.
Computer memory is an ON/OFF condition. It always represents one of two states, a BINARY condition. A byte of data, 8 bits, can store 28, or 256 combinations. Starting with Zero, the highest number possible is 255.
Every machine on the Internet has a unique identifying number, called an IP Address. The IP stands for Internet Protocol, which is the language that computers use to communicate over the Internet. A protocol is the pre-defined way that someone who wants to use a service talks with that service. The "someone" could be a person, but more often it is a computer program like a Web browser.
A typical IP address looks like this:
216.27.61.137
To make it easier for us humans to remember, IP addresses are normally expressed in decimal format as a dotted decimal number like the one above. But computers communicate in binary form. Look at the same IP address in binary:
11011000.00011011.00111101.10001001
The four numbers in an IP address are called octets, because they each have eight positions when viewed in binary form. If you add all the positions together, you get 32, which is why IP addresses are considered 32-bit numbers. Since each of the eight positions can have two different states (1 or zero), the total number of possible combinations per octet is 28 or 256. So each octet can contain any value between zero and 255. Combine the four octets and you get 232 or a possible 4,294,967,296 unique values!
Out of the almost 4.3 billion possible combinations, certain values are restricted from use as typical IP addresses. For example, the IP address 0.0.0.0 is reserved for the default network and the address 255.255.255.255 is used for broadcasts.
The octets serve a purpose other than simply separating the numbers. They are used to create classes of IP addresses that can be assigned to a particular business, government or other entity based on size and need. The octets are split into two sections: Net and Host. The Net section always contains the first octet. It is used to identify the network that a computer belongs to. Host (sometimes referred to as Node) identifies the actual computer on the network. The Host section always contains the last octet. There are five IP classes plus certain special addresses. You can learn more about IP classes at What is an IP address?.
#425. To: nolu chan, buckeroo, calcon, etta alla da udder scrotumless (#423)
THE HARROWUP CHALLENGE: post a working link to any dot-decimal IPA address containing an octet value greater than 255.
291 is a legitimate IPa harrowup, 2011-04-22
Admiral/doctor/pilot/CEO/MBA and Yale trained lawyer harrowup showing his ass re the IPA 95.154.230.291.
I made no such challenge.
Your sensitivity to the darkening moon is coming sooner than usual. Try not to nap during the day.***
***For those just tuning in:
#3 shit bug mojoke has a long history of highly irrational behavior during both extreme moon phases. If you know him take all sharp objects away from him on the 28th.
What I would really like to understand is WHY? Why in the world do these people, (or person) spend so much time and energy protecting a screen name? No one knows the real yukon- or is threatening to out the real person behind the screen name. Is this fun for hup and the yukons? Is it all just a stoopid game?
I don't get it. Why are these people so demented? It's a screen name. It is not like the yukon character was a pillar of morality and kindness BEFORE the link.
dbr, check some of my posts to harrowup in the latest comments. from me to him. i've said this a million times. the hours that harrowup and gatlin have spent defending an intangible screen name borders on insane. all the posts, threats, attacks, reading time: over the non-existent 'honor' of some creepy weird alaskan dude's screen name?
Gatlin is of the old military school of duty honor and country and demands proof beyond any doubt that something is true or false.
and yet gatlin continues to insist yukon was "hacked", despite not providing proof "beyond any doubt". we all know yukon, the screen name, posted those links. the burden of proof is on the accusers, the ones falling all over themselves claiming it wasn't really yukon. so far, their explanations and evidence have failed to satisfy.
we're long past 'put up or shut up' time. the law offices of larry, curly and moe (gatlin, harrowup & whitesands) have tacitly admitted yukon's guilt by providing nothing of substance.
:) BillNYE! Hey remember I met you over breakfast in PA?? ;)
Anyway- yes, that is what I would expect from a scientist! Some logic! The deeper and more macabre thing about this porno linking stuff is WHY in the world not just laugh it off- and go about having fun?
The WHY? Is so much more interesting to me. Then again, I have had some very odd things happen to my screen name and my personal info- and my photos at porn sites - at the hands of cyber stalkers. I have learned to see creepy stalkers in a different light. They really love porno sites for revenge and tomfoolery- I think it might be a sexual dysfunction.