A shocking new study published in a prestigious medical journal has found a direct statistical link between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates in the developed world, suggesting that the increasing number of inoculations being forced upon children by medical authorities, particularly in the United States which administers the highest number of vaccines and also has the highest number of infant deaths, is in fact having a detrimental impact on health.
According to his biography, Goldman has served as a reviewer for the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Vaccine, AJMC, ERV, ERD, JEADV,and British Medical Journal (BMJ). He is included on the Editorial Board of Research and Reviews in BioSciences.
Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates, the study found, adding that the results demand an essential inquiry into the correlation between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and infant mortality rates.
Despite the fact that the United States administers the highest number of vaccine doses to children in the entire developed world, 26 before infants reach the age of one, its infant mortality rate is higher than 33 other nations, all of which administer less vaccines. The study clearly illustrates the fact that developed countries which administer less vaccines have lower infant mortality rates, suggesting a direct statistical link between vaccination side-effects and infant deaths.
For example, the two developed countries that require children be immunized with the least amount of vaccines, Japan and Sweden, also top the table for the lowest infant mortality rates.
Of the top ten developed countries with the lowest infant mortality rates, seven of the ten also appear in the top ten table of countries that administer the least vaccines.
When looked at in comparison, the table of countries ordered by which ones administer the least vaccines compared to the table which orders countries based on infant mortality rates is very similar.
Despite the fact that it administers the most vaccines, the United States has the highest infant mortality rate of all developed countries, with an average of 6.22 deaths per 1000 live births. The US has a far higher infant mortality rate than the likes of Cuba or Slovenia despite spending vastly more on health care.
Click for enlargement. The table on the left shows the countries with the lowest infant deaths at the top of the list. The table on the right shows the countries with the lowest number of vaccines administered at the top of the list. Notice a pattern? The United States, which administers the highest number of vaccines to children in the developed world, also has the highest number of infant deaths per 1000 births in the developed world.
The correlation between higher numbers of vaccines and infant mortality figures takes on an altogether more sinister context when we consider the fact that during the February 2010 TED conference, Bill Gates, an enthusiastic proponent of vaccination programs, openly stated that vaccines should be used to lower global population in the pursuit of reducing CO2 emissions.
Decrying the fact that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.
Gates followed this up at the July 2010 Aspen Ideas Festival in Aspen Colorado by advocating so-called death panels, implying that elderly patients undergoing expensive health care treatments should instead be left to die and the money spent elsewhere.
As one of the richest men on the planet, Gates routinely meets with other billionaires in secret to discuss ways of lowering the global population. The last such confab, also attended by David Rockefeller Jr, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey, took place on May 5th 2009 at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the Rockefeller University in Manhattan.
Parents are becoming increasingly educated about the risks posed by the ever-rising numbers of vaccines being forced upon their children. The US childhood immunization schedule now recommends that all infants receive 26 vaccine doses before they even reach the age of one. A Rasmussen poll conducted last August found that that 52 per cent of Americans were concerned about the safety of vaccines.
Vaccine side-effects, injuries and deaths are skyrocketing, but this in turn is causing the cover-up overseen by the pharmaceutical industry to implode, leading more people to resist vaccines globally in the knowledge that the inoculations are more closely related to profit-making than protecting public health.
I thought this was an interesting article until I read that nonsense.
Bill Gates is a great man who revolutionized our world and has now donated the vast majority of his wealth to charity.
Sure, some of the things the Gates Foundation may or may not be misguided, but they are learning at the same time. Gates is all about trying something, making mistakes, and learning from those mistakes. That's the culture he set up at Microsoft. This is why Microsoft was wildly successful. Gates wants results. He'll do what it takes to get those results. Contrast this with brain dead politicians who never admit that they are wrong. This is why they fail. This is why government programs often have the exact opposite affect as was intended.
The Gates Foundation has a ton of research on failed schools. They have an enormous amount of statistical evidence that demonstrate that bad teachers (who are protected by unions and rules of "tenure") are the key contributor to our failing school system. The Gates Foundation has shown that there is more variation between classrooms within a school than there is between schools. They have shown that schools where principals can terminate poor teachers (like Charter schools) do better than those that can't.
In the 1990s, everyone knew that Gates was a hero. He defeated a stodgy old corporation (IBM) and helped give us the personal, networked computing world we live in now.
Then the Clinton Administration attacked Gates and Microsoft, who at the time had almost no lobbying effort. Clinton's biggest political contributors were Microsoft's main competitors (notably Sun and Oracle). So, Gates become a whipping boy of the brain-dead left.
Now apparently, he's even become a whipping boy on the far right.
It's sick and wrong.
Whoever wrote this article should be ashamed of himself.
"Everything that can be invented has been invented."-- Charles Duell, Commissioner of US Patent Office, 1899
"In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.
P = People S = Services per person E = Energy per service C = CO2 per energy unit
Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero.
Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number P (for People) might be reduced. He says:
The world today has 6.8 billion people thats headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
You can watch this yourself at:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A
Reducing the world population through vaccines
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.
So what does it mean when Bill Gates says if we do a really great job on new vaccines we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?
Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction.
There is plenty more of this stuff out there, if you care to research it for yourself...
A single quote from a Bill Gates speech should cure you of your hero-worship...
In a recent TED conference presentation...
I don't worship anyone.
Yes, I read that nonsensical quote in the article you posted. It linked to another NUT site with no references to the actual video of the speech.
ALL of the TED conferences are online. Why didn't it link to the video??? I am a member of TED. It's free to join to get the videos.
SHOW ME the TED conference where Gates said this.
You can't, because it's not true.
I live in Seattle. I used to work at Microsoft. I've met Bill Gates (1 time), but I know the Gates Foundation CEO quite well.
Eric, I respect your economic views and agree with a lot of what you say. But when you start posting conspiracy nuts like Alex Jones as the truth, you lose me and every other person who could actually be your allies in getting the country out of the mess we are in. You lose credibility posting this unsubstantiated nonsense. You look like a kook here.
I don't want you to be a kook.
"Everything that can be invented has been invented."-- Charles Duell, Commissioner of US Patent Office, 1899
I can't see, since the firewall blocks streaming media.
But when you start posting conspiracy nuts like Alex Jones as the truth, you lose me and every other person who could actually be your allies in getting the country out of the mess we are in.
Two points:
1. AJ sources everything. 2. There is NO "getting the country out of the mess we are in."
There's nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. The politicians will throw ALL of us under the bus (and their mothers, too), to maintain power... even if it means they only live an hour more than we do. THEY DON'T CARE.
They'll use the stupidity and gullibility of socialists like whining-old and lucysmom, who will demand- DEMAND- their "retirement money," even though that money no longer exists.
We- Americans, as a whole- are being attacked on a variety of fronts, and each attacking group has their own agenda... whether it's "reconquista," (like the Gates Foundation donated money to) or eugenics (which Bill is an adherent of, like his father), there are a variety of ways we're being attacked.
You lose credibility posting this unsubstantiated nonsense. You look like a kook here.
Yeah, I used to think AJ was a kook, when I first started listening to him... until he started throwing out sources, right in the middle of his radio program... He said something like, "oh, you think I'm a kook, do you? Don't believe they wanna' kill the internet? Go to www.motherjones, look up "obama kill-switch internet," and see if it's there..." And so I did, and voila, there it was.
He did the same thing with UN announcements, IMF documents, World Health Organization documents, etc. etc... ALL posted on the internet, in plain view.
YOU think I look like a kook? I'm fine with that.
One last quote, which you won't even have to look up... call it a "freebie."
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one." --Charles Mackay, 'Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds'
You're either part of the solution or you're a kook. One or the other.
A variation of "you're either part of the solution or part of the problem."
I used to believe that, too. But the fact is that this simplistic expression is often *too* simplistic.
I had nothing to do with the decades of spending by our out-of-control government. As well, the military-industrial complex is too powerful to fight, even I did try to do something about it.
It'd be like Don Quixote (sp?) Tilting at an infinitely tall windmill...
Likewise, the problem is too big to solve. The financial debt burden is *global.* the banksters- which OWN the political whores- will not allow the governments to simply default, which is the only realistic option.
Using such trite expressions- "part of the solution or part of the problem" - ignores the reality that sometimes, there is no solution.
The sheer *size* of the problem precludes any meaningful solution.
The only option I can see at this point, is to prepare as well as one can... Get away from paper money, stock up on the necessities (whatever you deem as such), and do a lot of praying.