Title: buckeroo's open letter thread Source:
me URL Source:http://none Published:Apr 30, 2011 Author:me Post Date:2011-04-30 22:20:42 by Wood_Chopper Keywords:None Views:14782 Comments:23
I keep looking around for that thread, but it seems to be gone? Can anyone point me to it? Is it in the biker bar? Thanks.
Yes. It was shaken up into the bit bucket by the powers to be acting as ADMINISTRATION of LF within the Internet cloud, forever lost from publick viewing.
Yes. It was shaken up into the bit bucket by the powers to be acting as ADMINISTRATION of LF within the Internet cloud, forever lost from publick viewing.
CRAP! I feel so ....... temporary.
Like a book on a Kindle, that can be edited, on a whim.
The thing is, we had about thirty-five sticky notes attached and about 170 views until the plug was pulled by BIG_BROTHER. I never made a comment on it, either.
Oh, you poor baby ... nobody loves you. I'm picking on you, so you post an "open letter to Goldi" and Stone pulls the thread. (But, wait ... Stone dosn't delete threads, he said that. Oh well).
#14. To: socalv8, calcon, A K A Stone, Fred Mertz, etal (#13)
Excellent. Let them eat stale cake. The LP Kloaughns' own irresponsible posting history has proven an issue without you, me or anyone.
Keep in mind, that original ideas are encouraged with me. If a few people that are known to use ICQ or AOL_Messenger or other means to have their back_channel discussions analyzing details that go nowhere but into the ether ... are fine.
I can't speak for Stone. Even if I were you, Stone couldn't analyze any details from his Pinguinite software specific to ID, nor could he from any server or network software that he may have Apache or otherwise. The claims are bogus everywhere about all these multiple-clients.
What has been exposed is that there is a problem with LP management. I have never been responsible for it. All the claims are wild methods of distraction at Goldi-Lox's own capability to control her own posters within the common model of channel discussion she envisioned for LP.
Well, she is stuck with her own failings. And it is history. It is up to us to leave it all in the dust. BTW, if you know any good posters @LP, bring 'em on over here @LF.
Please note: everything is transparent in the publick by myself. No rhetoric or skulduggery behind shady methods at all; no backroom brawls using deceptive tactics and ways to hurt a poster or anyone. The goal or goals are simple for me on these political chit-chat channels and I believe for most others like myself: to view good articles dragged here from good posters; in addition, to discuss variations of personal opinion in a responsible way about the articles.
I do not speak for Stone. He has proven to restrict posts and threads based upon a method I am not familiar with. In fact this post might be deleted.... just ask Fred Mertz and others. But, at least, Stone attempts to administer his channel which is good news.