Title: Skip Intro Challenging A K A Stone on Origins Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Sep 24, 2010 Author:Dabney Coleman Post Date:2010-09-24 13:52:14 by Skip Intro Keywords:None Views:77916 Comments:110
You had dinosaurs with their insides intact? If you learned that way back when. There should be some article on the web that shows the insides of a dinosaur? And to survive intact billions of years. Amazing.
You don't need anything for evolution, except an overactive imagination.
Ok then give me one real world example of witnessed evolution. You can't because it didn't happen and will never happen. I'm taking one species to another.
You had dinosaurs with their insides intact? If you learned that way back when. There should be some article on the web that shows the insides of a dinosaur? And to survive intact billions of years. Amazing.
You can tell by the pelvic bone structure, in most cases it's very similiar to that of chickens.
You're stupid. See the above post. In human beings yes because we have studied what the insides are and can make conclusions based on that. But on dinosaurs and other long extinct species it would be assumptions.
So it's your belief that dinosaurs are an outlier species. That everything that has been discovered and held true in forensic biology is not applicable to dinosaurs.
Show me one of these dinosaurs with its insides intact. Actually you would have to show me every kind of dinosaur that existed to have a valid point. Get busy.
That's an easy one. It's when god and his drinking buddies got to talking about faith and satan - no, not that one, bet god that even his most loyal and righteous subject, Job, could be made to curse god if the proper inducements were made.
God said to go ahead, just don't kill him. So Job lost all of his family, his possessions, and then his health. Then his friends came along to further torment him, but he never cursed god, so god said "That's good enough for me", and gave him a brand new family, wealth, and his health back.
It is never explained what his old family did to deserve being killed for a bet, and apparently Job never missed them once he got his new family.
So it's not a book abut dinosaurs as you claim it is.
You have a gross underknowledge of the religion you proclaim to adhere.
The book of John is not a book about pharisees. There are pharisees ih the book but that is not the core of the subject. I'm not surprised that you don't get that. You threw your common sense out the window when you started imagining evolution.
how me one of these dinosaurs with its insides intact. Actually you would have to show me every kind of dinosaur that existed to have a valid point. Get busy.
I doubt you would be able to tell the difference between a mammalian skeleton or that of a bird or dinosaur anyway. You lack curiosity and are afraid you might learn something,
People did not call them 'dinosaurs' before the 1800s' because, the word was not yet inverted. They referred to them being 'monsters', and 'dragons', and 'leviathians' and other such names. The word (dragon or dragons) is mentioned 34 times in King James Bible.
Not only are Dinosaurs in the bible, but dinosaurs did not live 65 millions years ago like many claim. Check out the link below discovery of blood cells and soft Tissue inside Dinosaur bone.
"Round and tiny and nucleated, they were threaded through the bone like red blood cells in blood vessels. But blood cells in a dinosaur bone should have disappeared eons ago. 'I got goose bumps. ...It was exactly like looking at a slice of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn't believe it. ...The bones are, after all 65 million years old. How could blood cells survive that long?'" (Science, Research News, V.261, 9/7/'93)
Some species of chameleon lizards lay eggs. Others give live birth. Garter snakes lay eggs. Rat snakes give live birth.
So explain how you could look at the skeletal structure (or anybody else, for that matter) and know from just that which lay eggs and which give live, yee of of infinite biological wisdom.