[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

300 Protesters Throw Rocks, Eggs at LAPD Station (this sanctuary city is getting exactly what it deserves...ole)

Jew Jokes

Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) Pans Church’s ‘Selfish’ Quran Burning Protest

(my title) An Islamic Practice: Temporary’ Marriage & Sex With 4 year old, Sodomizing; Masterbating on Child (no penetration) Who Did This? Video

As a scientist I'm certain Stephen Hawking is wrong. You can't explain the universe without God

Obama State Dept. Spokesman: Koran Burning Protest Same as 9/11 Attacks

Democratic Primary Turnout Lowest in 80 Years, Study Shows

Parties Tied at 46% in Generic Ballot for Congress (GOP drops 10 points)

BREAKING: Dozens Of Homes Burn Across Detroit

Deputy who arrested Mel Gibson sues own department AP

City Council Meetings to Begin with Muslim Prayers

Trace Cyrus Goes from Metro Station to UFOs

Tupac 'Wanted Me to Smoke Weed' with Him: Mike Tyson

Rahm Emanuel Wants to Run for Mayor of Chicago

We Can Still Change the World

If u support Pastor Terry Jones

New Research Restores Psychedelics’ Medical Respectability, Suggests That 'Magic Mushrooms' And 'Ecstasy' May Have Medical Value.

Government Report: Microbes Are Eating BP Oil Without Creating Oxygen-Starved `Dead Zones'

US Appeals Court: Judges Can Demand Warrant For Police To Get Cell Phone Tracking Data

Justice Department Investigating At Least 5 Anti-Muslim Acts In 4 States; Holder Meets Clerics

The Decline and Fall of Time Magazine: This Week’s Anti-Semitic Cover

The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond

Mrs. Betty Bowers' Christian Sex Tape

Delaware GOP Suggests Tea Party Senate Challenger Is a 'Liar'

Attorney General Eric Holder To Meet With Faith Leaders Amid Fears Af Anti-Muslim Tide

ACLU Sues To Stop Suspicionless Searches Of Electronics

Glenn Beck May Be a Clown -- But the Shady Right-Wingers Who Pull His Strings Are Dangerous

Obama shouldn't blame Bush for recession

war VS Jethro Tull...A NO HOLDS BARRED DEATHMATCH!!

Tea Party Candidate (Christine O’Donnell) Against Masturbation?

Iran Increases Nuclear Stockpile

Republican 'Young Guns' Critical Of Bush Legacy And Party Hierarchy

Church Rebuffs Military Concerns On Quran Burning

Major Democratic Donors Shift Donations To The Right

New Polls Spell Gloom For Obama's Democrats

Putin Compares Himself To FDR As He Hints At Third Term

Secret Service Tossed Non-Essentials From White House Bunker On 9/11

Montana Tea Party Leader Axed Over Comments Concerning Hanging Of Homosexuals

Emmer son pays underage drinking fine

WARNING!! About freedom4um.com

Dangerous Economic Misconceptions

Establishment Republicans, Legends In Their Own Minds.

It's Official: Goldi Declares LP A Zionist Site

The Reckless Mess Created by The Fed

Alaska US Senate candidate cited in 3-car crash

Banned Websites.

LI man fires gun, arrested in dispute on his lawn

Afghanistan's dirty little secret

Obama: They talk about me like a dog (BWAH! BWAH! BIG BABY WANT A BOTTLE??)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Despite War Cries From Neocons United States, Iran to Restart Talks
Source: middle-east-online
URL Source: http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=40299
Published: Jul 30, 2010
Author: middle-east-online
Post Date: 2010-07-30 15:36:24 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 12

Despite the war cries from the neocons and the far right, Washington and Tehran will soon be back at the negotiating table. The hard work by Turkey and Brazil was disparaged by many in the United States, but it seems to have paid off, notes Robert Dreyfuss.

Talks on Iran’s nuclear program will resume in September, and despite the war bluster from neocons and the far right, the Obama administration seems prepared to try once again.

From discussions with US officials, here’s what I’ve gleaned about the administration’s policy on Iran. First, there is no appetite whatsoever, and no serious consideration, being given to a military attack on Iran. Not even Dennis Ross, the hawkish aide at the National Security Council, brings up the possibility of a military strike, US officials tell me.

Second, they say, sanctions against Iran may or may not impact Iran’s decision-making over its nuclear program, and it’s unlikely that sanctions can work effectively; but in any case sanctions are designed for their long-term impact -- over years and not weeks or months -- so the latest round of sanctions isn’t designed to have immediate impact on how Iran approaches talks later this summer. This means that hawks who call for setting a tight deadline for the sanctions to work are simply trying to use the sanctions as a stepping-stone to war. Obama isn’t listening.

Finally, US officials say, Obama has consistently supported engagement with Iran since the campaign of 2008. He didn’t abandon the policy of engagement and diplomacy under withering attacks from Hillary Clinton in 2008, and he didn’t abandon them under the firestorm of criticism by the likes of the American Enterprise Institute and the Weekly Standard in 2009. The problem is, Iran didn’t or couldn’t respond positively to Obama’s offer to engage, beyond the October 2009 breakthrough in which Iran agreed to ship most of its enriched uranium to France and Russia for reprocessing. That accord broke down when Iran’s fractured political system proved incapable of implementing it.

Now, it appears, the talks are back on track.

The State Department announced yesterday that it is prepared to re-engage and restart the aborted talks over the deal reached last October concerning the enriched uranium for Tehran’s research reactor. This is a big deal. Said P.J. Crowley, the State Department spokesman: “We obviously are fully prepared to follow up with Iran on specifics regarding our initial proposal involving the Tehran research reactor ... as well as, you know, the broader issues of trying to fully understand the nature of Iran's nuclear program. We hope to have the same kind of meeting coming up in the coming weeks that we had last October.”

According to US officials, the new talks are likely to begin at the technical level. But they could quickly escalate to more senior officials.

Catherine Ashton, the chief negotiator for the European Union, also said that the EU -- which is represented by the U.K., France and Germany in the so-called P5 + 1 -- is ready to start talking again, and she raised the possibility that the talks could expand to broader issues: “I've made it clear...that we would like those talks to resume quickly and that we would be very clear that the issue on the table is Iran’s nuclear weapons capability and approach. That is the issue. All other issues can be discussed later.”

Significantly, Iran has reportedly told Turkey that it is prepared to halt further enrichment of uranium from 3-5 percent to 20 percent (the level needed for the Tehran medical research reactor) in hope of restarting the accord reached last October in Geneva. If so, that’s a big deal, too, since Turkey and Brazil have been actively engaged in trying to broker a deal with Iran. The hard work by those two countries was disparaged by many in the United States, but it seems to have paid off.

The Iranians have also agreed to start talking again in September. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, who supported the October deal but failed to get backing either from Ayatollah Khamenei or from the reformist opposition for it, says that Iran will reenter talks, as CNN reports:

“Iran is ready for ‘effective cooperation’ to resolve the dispute over its nuclear program, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in an interview with state media. … ‘We said that we will talk with P5+1 as of early September, but there are some conditions,’ Ahmadinejad told Press TV on Monday. ‘One of the conditions is that others should be present in the discussions as well.’”

What does this all mean? It means that despite the huffing and puffing from some quarters, diplomacy is back on track. In both Iran and the United States, there are powerful voices being raised against the idea of accommodating the other side, so talks won’t be easy. The talks may go on for many months, if not years. But the administration, so far, seems prepared to see it through.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com