Primative Weapons
See other Primative Weapons Articles
Title: Goldi: Palin Quitting Was A Brilliamt Move Worthy of George Washington
Source:
Liberty Post
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=292788&Disp=14#C14
Published: Jul 19, 2010
Author: Goldi-Lox
Post Date: 2010-07-19 09:16:33 by war
Keywords: None
Views: 75514
Comments: 88
#14. To: GrandIsland (#9)
Those who criticise Palin for quitting the Governorship, should take a look at our Founding Father, George Washington.
He had NO desire to be President, and did so only because he was needed.
Others did the same with regard to service.
Palin realized that by staying she would harm her state, and left. If she was power mad, she would have hung on like the Democrats do...to the bitter end.
However, she chose to leave on a positive note, and has done a LOT to help the conservative cause.
In hindsight, her departure was a brilliant move.
Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-07-16 12:46:35 ET Reply Trace
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-20) not displayed.
.
.
.
#21. To: A K A Stone (#7)
That's like an alcoholic curing a hangover with another drink.
Aha...now I remember... Also on that thread, Pan-Z-Boy got outtted as a liar...he claimed he'd opus'd too: #233. To: LP MGMT NOTICE - POSTER BANNED (#228) [:Comment Pulled: banned ] reaganisright posted on 2009-11-15 4:45:55 ET Reply Trace
So much for your knowledge on economic matters, or deficits.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
You really shouldn't be lecturing others until you read this: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=966 You should look up the word 'lecture'...(chuckle)
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
People forget that the Laffer Curve is a Bell Curve. Just cutting taxes to any old rate doesn't guarantee maximum revenues.
And then there's this, from the head of George W. Bush's council of economic advisors, Greg Mankiw (Economics Professor at Harvard) -- Yes, folks forget about the "curve" part of it. If it were linear, then cutting income tax rates to say .00000001% should raise trillions in revenue.
As soon as I'm done finding "refudiate" But here's a lecture for you from the guy who architected the Bush tax cuts: http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2007/07/on-charlatons-and-cranks.html I know it takes a real dunce to cut income, increase deficit spending and claim growth will take care of debt.
I don't pay attention to those that require 'tenure' on such matters.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Bush's own economic team argued that the tax cuts would recoup 25% of the cost of income tax cuts and 50% of the cost of capital gains tax cuts. He seems to have missed that. If there's one thing I couldn't stand in graduate school it was a professor who came to class unprepared for his lecture. :-)
I'm not in the least impressed.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
I'll take 'Whats Owe-bama and the Democrat Controlled Congress for $500' Alex....(laughing)
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Again, with each passing post you demonstrate your ignorance. Now if you want to argue that you know more about tax policy and its effects then the former chairman of Bush's council of economic advisors, be my guest. We'll all have a nice laugh at your expense.
He seems to have missed that. If there's one thing I couldn't stand in graduate school it was a professor who came to class unprepared for his lecture. If not for the entire financial/economic system being undermined by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, plus (to be fair) the insane deficit spending by the Bush Whitehouse and then GOP controlled congress, it would have worked in my view. All we've done SINCE is triple the deficit, and make America less hospitable to business, and via several pieces of legislation and Executive Orders destroyed existing jobs and company's...and it looks like entire industries. Enough blame to go around. But we aren't about to vote on Bush, or the idiots from the GOP that got their collective asses kicked in 2006 for fiscal stupidity. No matter how much the Left and this Administration wishes we were.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
“It has been one of the strongest profits recoveries ever,” said David S. Bianco, chief United States equity strategist for Bank of America Merrill Lynch. “You have got to go back to the Depression to find a profits recovery that outpaces this one.”
Three cheers for Bankers? (laughing) Its hilarious you grasp at this straw, goofy.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
(laughing) Its hilarious you grasp at this straw, goofy. Chipmaker Intel Corp. reported strong earnings and a positive outlook for growth after the market closed Tuesday, a day after Alcoa Inc. and CSX Corp. did the same.
I'm still at a loss as to why you would think "your view" has any credibility.
Doesn't change the fact you cited bankers in the previous comment, goofy. Sheesh, talk about desperate...
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
If you really think that, filter me, GO65. Trust me, I don't lose any sleep over such things, unlike many in these forums.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
#16. To: JoeSnuffy (#1) We need a renewal of McCarthyism. He was right, and history has proven it. We need to identify the Commies, and blackball them from having ANY kind of position of authority or policy making in this country for life. There needs to also be an ongoing law enacted that anyone who joins any communist/socialist group, or attests to the concepts of Marxism be added to that list. Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-07-19 13:44:59 ET
Did you ever get the feeling that "Joe" was a parody? Sometimes he'd have moments of clarity...most of the time he was wholly off the wall...
Yes, he is sometimes on target and often all over the board. I never considered him a parody though.
That is Nurse Ratched's idea of free speech.
Looks like I have been banned there,too. I was going to post a comment there a couple of days ago about Mel Gibson,and couldn't sign in. Goldi isn't answering my email questions about it,either.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
I saw that you were pinged at elPee last week when some of the 'old guys' were telling some Viet Nam memories and experiences.
Gee, I was a trend setter in 2007....(chuckle)
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
So much for your knowledge on economic matters, or deficits. You DO understand you were addressing lucysmom,right?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
yeah...I know, sneaky. Hence 'goofysmom'.
Obama's first all-by-his-lonesome budget, btw, calls for a $1.17 trillion deficit.
Afuckingmazing...and you're such the pleasant sort too...
That's her MO, btw. She ignored my emails pretending that she was waiting to hear from me regarding whether I'd apologize [as if] to packie the perv. I finally sent her an email stating that I was going to have someone post my emails to her.
Out of curiosity, I went over to the cuckoo's nest. I was able to sign in. Didn't attempt to post.
I post there on occasion, but not very often.
She has the right enemy. Mcarthy was right. But what she is describing isn't Mcarthyism.
You abdicated, right?
lol, never. You were always just a bore. Though you are trying to lead the trend of bringing back 70's fashions.
Badeye has a gay crush on ABBA
I think that was Yukon who abdicated. Until he got tired of looking in through the window and went back. lol
Badeye has a gay crush on ABBA
Ah - the secret banning.
Yes he abdicated.
Comments (62 - 88) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestShe is for keeping the Bush tax cuts.
#22. To: go65, Fred Mertz, Pan-Z-Boy (#19)
#23. To: lucysmom (#21)
She is for keeping the Bush tax cuts. That's like an alcoholic curing a hangover with another drink.
#24. To: Badeye (#23)
So much for your knowledge on economic matters, or deficits.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#25. To: go65 (#24)
#26. To: go65 (#24)
#27. To: Badeye, lucysmom (#24)
I used the phrase "charlatans and cranks" in the first edition of my principles textbook to describe some of the economic advisers to Ronald Reagan, who told him that broad-based income tax cuts would have such large supply-side effects that the tax cuts would raise tax revenue. I did not find such a claim credible, based on the available evidence. I never have, and I still don't.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#28. To: war, badeye, lucysmom (#26)
People forget that the Laffer Curve is a Bell Curve. Just cutting taxes to any old rate doesn't guarantee maximum revenues.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#29. To: Badeye (#25)
My other work has remained consistent with this view. In a paper on dynamic scoring, written while I was working at the White House, Matthew Weinzierl and I estimated that a broad-based income tax cut (applying to both capital and labor income) would recoup only about a quarter of the lost revenue through supply-side growth effects. For a cut in capital income taxes, the feedback is larger--about 50 percent--but still well under 100 percent. A chapter on dynamic scoring in the 2004 Economic Report of the President says about the the same thing.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#30. To: Badeye (#23)
So much for your knowledge on economic matters, or deficits.
#31. To: go65 (#27)
(Economics Professor at Harvard)
#32. To: lucysmom, badeye (#30)
I know it takes a real dunce to cut income, increase deficit spending and claim growth will take care of debt.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#33. To: go65 (#29)
#34. To: lucysmom (#30)
I know it takes a real dunce to cut income, increase deficit spending and claim growth will take care of debt.
#35. To: Badeye, lucysmom, war, skip intro, fred mertz, brian s, (#31)
(Edited)
I don't pay attention to those that require 'tenure' on such matters.
Nicholas Gregory "Greg" Mankiw (pronounced /mæKÈkjuÐ/) (born February 3, 1958) is an American macroeconomist. From 2003 to 2005, Mankiw was the chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisors. His publications are ranked among the most influential of the over 22,000 economists registered with RePEc.[1]
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#36. To: go65 (#32)
Bush's own economic team argued that the tax cuts would recoup 25% of the cost of income tax cuts and 50% of the cost of capital gains tax cuts.
#37. To: Badeye (#36)
All we've done SINCE is triple the deficit, and make America less hospitable to business, and via several pieces of legislation and Executive Orders destroyed existing jobs and company's...and it looks like entire industries.
#38. To: lucysmom (#37)
“It has been one of the strongest profits recoveries ever,” said David S. Bianco, chief United States equity strategist for Bank of America Merrill Lynch. “You have got to go back to the Depression to find a profits recovery that outpaces this one.”
#39. To: Badeye (#38)
Three cheers for Bankers?
#40. To: Badeye (#36)
it would have worked in my view.
Being a Republicans means you get to choose your own reality
#41. To: lucysmom (#39)
#42. To: go65 (#40)
it would have worked in my view. I'm still at a loss as to why you would think "your view" has any credibility.
#43. To: go65 (#40)
#44. To: Fred Mertz (#43)
#45. To: war (#44)
#46. To: Fred Mertz (#43)
#47. To: war (#22)
#48. To: sneakypete (#47)
#49. To: sneakypete (#47)
#50. To: Badeye, lucysmom (#23)
She is for keeping the Bush tax cuts. That's like an alcoholic curing a hangover with another drink.
#51. To: sneakypete (#50)
You DO understand you were addressing lucysmom,right?
#52. To: sneakypete (#47)
#53. To: sneakypete, lucysmom (#47)
Goldi isn't answering my email questions about it,either.
#54. To: war (#53)
#55. To: Bartcoprules (#54)
#56. To: Fred Mertz (#43)
#57. To: Bartcoprules (#54)
#58. To: Badeye (#49)
Gee, I was a trend setter in 2007....
#59. To: war (#57)
#60. To: sneakypete (#47)
Looks like I have been banned there,too. I was going to post a comment there a couple of days ago about Mel Gibson,and couldn't sign in. Goldi isn't answering my email questions about it,either.
#61. To: Abu el Banat (#59)
(Edited)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]