[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bush Wars
See other Bush Wars Articles

Title: US general [McChrystal] summoned to Washington
Source: ALJAZEERA.NET
URL Source: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/a ... 10/06/2010622111222326834.html
Published: Jun 22, 2010
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2010-06-22 07:56:15 by Fred Mertz
Keywords: None
Views: 108308
Comments: 99

The top US military commander in Afghanistan has been summoned to Washington after criticising the administration of Barack Obama, the US president, in a magazine article.

The White House recalled General Stanley McChrystal from Afghanistan on Tuesday to explain comments he made in a Rolling Stone magazine interview to be published on Friday, military officials said.

The order came after McChrystal apologised for the controversial comments in the profile, in which he is quoted denouncing a top diplomat while his aides dismiss Obama and mock his deputies.

"I extend my sincerest apology for this profile," McChrystal said in a statement issued ahead of the article's release.

"It was a mistake reflecting poor judgement and should never happened."

McChrystal, a former special operations chief, usually speaks cautiously in public and has enjoyed mostly sympathetic US media coverage since he took over the Nato-led force last year.

"Throughout my career, I have lived by the principles of personal honour and professional integrity. What is reflected in this article falls far short of that standard," he said.

Strategy debate

In the profile, McChrystal jokes sarcastically about preparing to answer a question referring to Joe Biden, the US vice-president, known to be a sceptic of the commander's war strategy.

He also told the magazine that he felt "betrayed" by Karl Eikenberry, the US ambassador to Kabul, in a White House debate over war strategy last year.

Referring to a leaked internal memo from Eikenberry that questioned McChrystal's request for more troops, the commander said that the ambassador had tried to protect himself for "for the history books".

"I like Karl, I've known him for years, but they'd never said anything like that to us before," McChrystal said in the article.

Eikenberry, himself a former commander in Afghanistan, had written to the White House saying Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, was an unreliable partner and that a surge of troops could draw the US into an open-ended quagmire.

The article revisits the friction between the White House and the military last year as Obama debated whether to grant McChrystal's request for tens of thousands of reinforcements.

Al Jazeera's James Bays, reporting from Kabul, said that McChrystal managed to offend every single one of his key bosses with the statements in the article.

Our correspondent said that the Rolling Stone reporter managed to get high level access: "I met the reporter in Washington, DC, over a month ago after he came out of a meeting inside the White House with McChrystal's advisors.

"This incident shows the tensions that exist between the top advisors here in Afghanistan. What will happen now is how this agreement is viewed on Capitol Hill and on the Afghan street.

"The Taliban is also trying to win over the Afghan people. There is certainly very little disunity normally in the Taliban."

Further turmoil

Meanwhile, as foreign forces in Afghanistan marked another grim milestone in their war against the Taliban, signs of cracks in the alliance surfaced.

After 10 soldiers were killed in a single day, there was further turmoil for Nato as Britain announced that Sherard Cowper-Coles, its special envoy to Afghanistan, was taking "extended leave".

William Hague, Britain's foreign secretary, is to review the post of special envoy to Afghanistan, the BBC reported.

The news of Cowper-Coles's departure came amid reports that he had clashed with military officials over strategy, just a month ahead of a crucial international conference in the Afghan city of Kabul.

The Guardian newspaper reported there had been serious disagreements in recent months between Cowper-Coles and officials from Nato.

It said that Cowper-Coles was convinced the military-focused counter-insurgency effort was headed for failure and wanted talks with Taliban fighters to be a priority.

The Taliban, however, has so far rejected a plan drawn up at a landmark Kabul peace meeting to give jobs and money to those who lay down arms.

Last month they promised a new campaign of attacks on diplomats, lawmakers and foreign forces.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 78.

#8. To: Fred Mertz (#0)

McChrystal fucked up here. If you are going to trash the Commander in Chief, you resign first.

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-22   9:26:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Badeye (#8)

I don't see how he did that. He made an off the cuff remark about Obama seeming unprepared in their first meeting; that's not trashing the president IMO. Of course, I doubt McChrystal ever expected his comment to see the light of day.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-22   9:35:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Fred Mertz (#9)

Of course, I doubt McChrystal ever expected his comment to see the light of day.

Riiiight. He gave an interview to ROLLING STONE, and didn' think his comments (plural, freddie) wouldn't see the light of day....(eyes rolling)

Stick to taunting our host til you actually catch up on the details of this particular story, freddie.

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-22   9:38:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Badeye (#10)

Do you think he'll be fired?

Right now I don't think so.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-22   9:40:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Fred Mertz (#11) (Edited)

Do you think he'll be fired?

I think he should be.

I don't think Obama will, tho. I do expect the wheels to be set immediately into motion for his replacement and he resigns just before Labor Day when no one is paying attention to anything.

war  posted on  2010-06-22   9:56:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#13)

I'll say around Thanksgiving time. I'm sure they already have his replacement selected though I'm not sure who it might be.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-06-22   10:02:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Fred Mertz (#14) (Edited)

I find active duty officers going off the reservation to be one of the more disturbing aspects of "politics"...

war  posted on  2010-06-22   10:07:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: war (#15)

I find active duty officers going off the reservation to be one of the more disturbing aspects of "politics"...

If by "going off the tracks" you mean publicly protesting the orders,tactics,and strategy of their civilian masters,I disagree.

There is not only nothing wrong with it,but they have a OBLIGATION to do so.

Their loyalty is to the US Constitution,the country itself,and the men and women under their command,not any political leader.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-22   21:44:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: sneakypete (#18)

They swore an oath to the USCON under which the POTUS is their commander and their rules of behavior [UCMJ] are set by Congress.

Look...I have respect for both his uniform and his rank and I have respect for his opinions as well. I just get uneasy. What happens when we get a general who can convince soldiers under his command that the USCON is just a "goddammed piece of paper"? He has to be fired. And then given a parade.

war  posted on  2010-06-22   22:12:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: war (#20)

They swore an oath to the USCON under which the POTUS is their commander and their rules of behavior [UCMJ] are set by Congress.

PARTIALLY true. They swear a oath to the country and the US Constitution. There is no such thing as a loyalty oath to a president.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-23   10:20:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: sneakypete (#29)

I never said that there was.

Again, the USCON - to which they've sworn the oath - designates POTUS their Commander in Chief and the same USCON designates the Congress as the rule making body for the military. What does the UCMJ demand in this regard?

war  posted on  2010-06-23   10:30:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: war (#31)

What does the UCMJ demand in this regard?

The maximum is dismissal, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-23   10:52:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: lucysmom (#35)

What does the UCMJ demand in this regard? The maximum is dismissal, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year.

WRONG!

We do NOT live in the leftist police state that you admire so much. We live in a free country (barely) where the military take loyalty oaths to the Constitution,not a political leader.

Your idols Adolph,Mao, and Uncle Joe had the system you think we have and that you admire,though.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-06-23   11:10:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: sneakypete (#39)

WRONG!

The UCMI has been around since the founding fathers and that's what it says.

Your idols Adolph,Mao, and Uncle Joe had the system you think we have and that you admire,though.

What a pile of poop!

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-23   11:22:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: lucysmom (#40)

The UCMI has been around since the founding fathers and that's what it says.

Huh? The UCMJ wasn't put into law until Truman.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2010-06-24   14:46:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: no gnu taxes (#73)

The UCMI has been around since the founding fathers and that's what it says. Huh? The UCMJ wasn't put into law until Truman.

Shhhhh! Like Belushi in Animal House....she's on a roll....(roaring with laughter)

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-24   14:48:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Badeye (#74)

The UCMI has been around since the founding fathers and that's what it says. Huh? The UCMJ wasn't put into law until Truman.

So you think the military operated without rules until 1950?

roaring with laughter!

The existing code was revised and standardized in 1950.

On 30 June 1775, the Second Continental Congress established 69 Articles of War to govern the conduct of the Continental Army.

lucysmom  posted on  2010-06-24   15:06:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: lucysmom (#77)

Goofy? You want to go back and read the thread slowly?

Or, maybe find somebody to read it to you?

rotflmao. God, this thread is a hoot.

First Rule of Holes, Goofy. When you are in one, stop digging.

Second Rule of Holes, don't begin digging another one, til you are out of the first one.

Badeye  posted on  2010-06-24   15:15:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 78.

#91. To: Badeye (#78)

Why don't you make an actual point, Boofer? If she's incorrect...point out where.

war  posted on  2010-06-25 08:52:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 78.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com